Comorbidity: Implications for the Importance of Primary Care in ‘Case’ Management

BACKGROUND Although comorbidity is very common in the population, little is known about the types of health service that are used by people with comorbid conditions. METHODS Data from claims on the nonelderly were classified by diagnosis and extent of comorbidity, using a case-mix measure known as the Johns Hopkins Adjusted Clinical Groups, to study variation in extent of comorbidity and resource utilization. Visits of patients (adults and children) with 11 conditions were classified as to whether they were to primary care physicians or to other specialists, and whether they involved the chosen condition or other conditions. RESULTS Comorbidity varied within each diagnosis; resource use depended on the degree of comorbidity rather than the diagnosis. When stratified by degree of comorbidity, the number of visits for comorbid conditions exceeded the number of visits for the index condition in almost all comorbidity groups and for visits to both primary care physicians and to specialists. The number of visits to primary care physicians for both the index condition and for comorbid conditions almost invariably exceeded the number of visits to specialists. These patterns differed only for uncommon conditions in which specialists played a greater role in the care of the condition, but not for comorbid conditions. CONCLUSIONS In view of the high degree of comorbidity, even in a nonelderly population, single-disease management does not appear promising as a strategy to care for patients. In contrast, the burden is on primary care physicians to provide the majority of care, not only for the target condition but for other conditions. Thus, management in the context of ongoing primary care and oriented more toward patients’ overall health care needs appears to be a more promising strategy than care oriented to individual diseases. New paradigms of care that acknowledge actual patterns of comorbidities as well as the need for close coordination between generalists and specialists require support.

[1]  C. T. Orleans,et al.  Does the chronic care model serve also as a template for improving prevention? , 2001, The Milbank quarterly.

[2]  Judith Smith,et al.  The effect of L-dopa on the potentiation of radiation damage to human melanoma cells. , 1990, British Journal of Cancer.

[3]  P. Gergen,et al.  Healthcare expenditures for sinusitis in 1996: contributions of asthma, rhinitis, and other airway disorders. , 1999, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[4]  D Blumenthal,et al.  Leaving gatekeeping behind--effects of opening access to specialists for adults in a health maintenance organization. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  J. Selby,et al.  Quality of primary care practice in a large HMO according to physician specialty. , 1999, Health services research.

[6]  G. Mitchell,et al.  Does primary medical practitioner involvement with a specialist team improve patient outcomes? A systematic review. , 2002, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[7]  C. Forrest,et al.  Gatekeeping and Referral of Children and Adolescents to Specialty Care , 1999, Pediatrics.

[8]  A. Bierman,et al.  Women's health, chronic disease, and disease management: new words and old music? , 1999, Women's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health.

[9]  E H Wagner,et al.  Quality improvement in chronic illness care: a collaborative approach. , 2001, The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement.

[10]  S. Greenfield,et al.  Outcomes of patients with hypertension and non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus treated by different systems and specialties. Results from the medical outcomes study. , 1995, JAMA.

[11]  M. Donohoe,et al.  Comparing generalist and specialty care: discrepancies, deficiencies, and excesses. , 1998, Archives of internal medicine.

[12]  T. Bodenheimer,et al.  Disease management--promises and pitfalls. , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  S. Gortmaker,et al.  Who cares for medicaid-enrolled children with chronic conditions? , 2001, Pediatrics.

[14]  K. Carriere,et al.  Factors influencing the frequency of visits by hypertensive patients to primary care physicians in Winnipeg. , 1998, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[15]  B Starfield,et al.  Self-referral in point-of-service health plans. , 2001, JAMA.

[16]  C. Hoffman,et al.  Persons with chronic conditions. Their prevalence and costs. , 1996, JAMA.

[17]  B. Starfield,et al.  Prevalence, expenditures, and complications of multiple chronic conditions in the elderly. , 2002, Archives of internal medicine.

[18]  C. Forrest,et al.  Prevalence of health problems and primary care physicians' specialty referral decisions. , 2001, The Journal of family practice.

[19]  L. Mell,et al.  Utilization and cost of health care services for children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. , 2001, Pediatrics.

[20]  J A Knottnerus,et al.  Multimorbidity in general practice: prevalence, incidence, and determinants of co-occurring chronic and recurrent diseases. , 1998, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[21]  J. Osterhaus,et al.  Healthcare Resource Use and Costs Associated with Migraine in a Managed Healthcare Setting , 1994, The Annals of pharmacotherapy.

[22]  Thomas Bodenheimer,et al.  Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness. , 2002, JAMA.