Fast modes in the set of minimal dissipation trajectories

Abstract In this paper, we study the set of trajectories satisfying both a given LTI system’s laws and also laws of the corresponding ‘adjoint’ system: in other words, trajectories in the intersection of the system’s behavior and that of the adjoint system. This intersection has important system theoretic significance: for example, it is known that the trajectories in this intersection are the ones with minimal ‘dissipation’. Underlying the notion of adjoint is that of a power supply: it is with respect to this supply rate that the trajectories in the intersection are known to be ‘stationary’. In this paper, we deal with half-line solutions to the differential equations governing both the system and its adjoint. Analysis of half-line solutions plays a central role for example in initial value problems and in well-posedness studies of an interconnection. We interpret the set of half-line trajectories allowed by a system and its adjoint as an interconnection of these two systems, and thus address issues about well-posedness/ill-posedness of the interconnection. We formulate necessary and sufficient conditions for this intersection to be autonomous. For the case of an ill-posed interconnection and resulting autonomous system, we derive conditions for existence of initial conditions that lead to impulsive solutions in the states of the system. We link our conditions with the strongly reachable and weakly unobservable subspaces of a state space system. We show that absence of impulsive initial conditions is equivalent to the well-known subspace iteration algorithms for these subspaces converging in one step.

[1]  Debasattam Pal,et al.  Dissipativity of Uncontrollable Systems, Storage Functions, and Lyapunov Functions , 2008, SIAM J. Control. Optim..

[2]  R. F. Sincovec,et al.  Solvability, controllability, and observability of continuous descriptor systems , 1981 .

[3]  H. Rosenbrock Structural properties of linear dynamical systems , 1974 .

[4]  B. Anderson,et al.  Optimal control: linear quadratic methods , 1990 .

[5]  J. Potter Matrix Quadratic Solutions , 1966 .

[6]  Madhu N. Belur,et al.  Singular LQ Control, Optimal PD Controller and Inadmissible Initial Conditions , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[7]  J. Polderman Proper Elimination of Latent Variables , 1993 .

[8]  P. Rapisarda,et al.  University of Groningen Linear Hamiltonian Behaviors and Bilinear Differential Forms , 2004 .

[9]  J. Doyle,et al.  Essentials of Robust Control , 1997 .

[10]  Arjan van der Schaft,et al.  Identification and data-driven reduced-order modeling for linear conservative port- and self-adjoint Hamiltonian systems , 2013, 52nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[11]  Harry L. Trentelman,et al.  Pick matrix conditions for sign-definite solutions of the algebraic Riccati equation , 2001, 2001 European Control Conference (ECC).

[12]  Jeffrey S. Rosenthal,et al.  Introduction to mathematical systems theory. a behavioral approach [Book Review] , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[13]  Harry L. Trentelman,et al.  Dissipativity preserving model reduction by retention of trajectories of minimal dissipation , 2009, Math. Control. Signals Syst..

[14]  L. Silverman,et al.  System structure and singular control , 1983 .

[15]  W. Wonham Linear Multivariable Control: A Geometric Approach , 1974 .

[16]  P. Rapisarda,et al.  Identification and data-driven model reduction of state-space representations of lossless and dissipative systems from noise-free data , 2011, Autom..

[17]  Margreta Kuijper,et al.  Why do stabilizing controllers stabilize? , 1995, Autom..

[18]  A. MacFarlane An Eigenvector Solution of the Optimal Linear Regulator Problem , 1963 .

[19]  M. Belur,et al.  Impulse free interconnection of dynamical systems , 2010 .

[20]  Harry L. Trentelman,et al.  Linear Hamiltonian Behaviors and Bilinear Differential Forms , 2004, SIAM J. Control. Optim..

[21]  Jan C. Willems,et al.  LQ-control: a behavioral approach , 1993, Proceedings of 32nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[22]  Danny C. Sorensen,et al.  Passivity preserving model reduction via interpolation of spectral zeros , 2003, 2003 European Control Conference (ECC).

[23]  J. Willems,et al.  Singular optimal control: A geometric approach , 1986 .

[24]  Thomas Kailath,et al.  Linear Systems , 1980 .

[25]  Jan C. Willems,et al.  Introduction to mathematical systems theory: a behavioral approach, Texts in Applied Mathematics 26 , 1999 .

[26]  Arjan van der Schaft,et al.  State Maps from Integration by Parts , 2011, SIAM J. Control. Optim..

[27]  D. Cobb Controllability, observability, and duality in singular systems , 1984 .

[28]  F. Rotella Singular Systems , 1992, Concise Encyclopedia of Modelling & Simulation.

[29]  T. Kailath,et al.  A generalized state-space for singular systems , 1981 .

[30]  W. P. M. H. Heemels,et al.  Linear Complementarity Systems , 2000, SIAM J. Appl. Math..

[31]  J. Willems,et al.  On Quadratic Differential Forms , 1998 .

[32]  J. Willems,et al.  On the dissipativity of uncontrollable systems , 2003, 42nd IEEE International Conference on Decision and Control (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37475).

[33]  Debasattam Pal,et al.  Stationary trajectories, singular Hamiltonian systems and ill-posed interconnection , 2013, 2013 European Control Conference (ECC).

[34]  A. Vardulakis Linear Multivariable Control: Algebraic Analysis and Synthesis Methods , 1991 .

[35]  W. M. Wonham,et al.  Linear Multivariable Control , 1979 .