Sensor Compatibility for Biomass Change Estimation Using Remote Sensing Data Sets: Part of NASA's Carbon Monitoring System Initiative

Time series of remote sensing data offers the opportunity to predict changes in vegetation extent and to estimate forest parameter change such as biomass. However, as sensors and technology advance, it is important to ensure that estimates obtained from different time periods or using different, but related, instruments are consistent in order to have confidence in detected change. This study compares estimates of biomass from small-footprint discrete-return LiDAR data and medium-footprint full-waveform LiDAR for Howland Experimental Forest, Maine, USA. Data were collected from both sensors during Summer 2009. Similar results were found using the same height metric with R2 = 0.67, SE = 58.5 Mg ha-1 and R2 = 0.52, SE = 58.1 Mg ha-1, respectively. The predicted model of the relationship between LiDAR metrics and biomass was applied to data captured in 2003. Identified areas of change corresponded well with a map of forest management operations of varying intensities. Where sensitivity to change allows, vegetation age estimated using time series of Landsat observations, combined with biomass estimates, allows growth curves to be produced to monitor the effect of pests or disease, recovery rates following disturbance, or carbon sequestration.

[1]  J. Bryan Blair,et al.  Decomposition of laser altimeter waveforms , 2000, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[2]  Klaus Von Gadow,et al.  Modelling Forest Development , 1998, Forestry Sciences.

[3]  R. Nelson,et al.  Estimating Siberian timber volume using MODIS and ICESat/GLAS. , 2009 .

[4]  W. Wagner,et al.  Operational wide-area stem volume estimation based on airborne laser scanning and national forest inventory data , 2009 .

[5]  Chengquan Huang,et al.  Global characterization and monitoring of forest cover using Landsat data: opportunities and challenges , 2012, Int. J. Digit. Earth.

[6]  Natascha Kljun,et al.  Vegetation height and cover fraction between 60° S and 60° N from ICESat GLAS data , 2012 .

[7]  Chengquan Huang,et al.  Development of time series stacks of Landsat images for reconstructing forest disturbance history , 2009, Int. J. Digit. Earth.

[8]  Nicholas C. Coops,et al.  Lidar plots — a new large-area data collection option: context, concepts, and case study , 2012 .

[9]  W. Cohen,et al.  Using Landsat-derived disturbance and recovery history and lidar to map forest biomass dynamics , 2014 .

[10]  Scarth Peter Integrating Landsat, ICESat and ALOS PALSAR for Regional Scale Vegetation Structure Assessment , 2012 .

[11]  Ross Nelson,et al.  A new photon-counting lidar system for vegetation analysis. , 2011 .

[12]  E. Næsset Accuracy of forest inventory using airborne laser scanning: evaluating the first nordic full-scale operational project , 2004 .

[13]  Guoqing Sun,et al.  Estimating forest aboveground biomass using HJ-1 Satellite CCD and ICESat GLAS waveform data , 2010 .

[14]  R. Nelson,et al.  Regional aboveground forest biomass using airborne and spaceborne LiDAR in Québec. , 2008 .

[15]  Chengquan Huang,et al.  Developing Consistent Landsat Data Sets for Large Area Applications: The MRLC 2001 Protocol , 2009, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[16]  Chengcui Zhang,et al.  A progressive morphological filter for removing nonground measurements from airborne LIDAR data , 2003, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[17]  R. Birdsey,et al.  National-Scale Biomass Estimators for United States Tree Species , 2003, Forest Science.

[18]  S. Goward,et al.  An automated approach for reconstructing recent forest disturbance history using dense Landsat time series stacks , 2010 .

[19]  Zhiqiang Yang,et al.  Detecting trends in forest disturbance and recovery using yearly Landsat time series: 1. LandTrendr — Temporal segmentation algorithms , 2010 .

[20]  Richard A. Birdsey,et al.  Comprehensive database of diameter-based biomass regressions for North American tree species , 2004 .

[21]  Ross Nelson,et al.  Model effects on GLAS-based regional estimates of forest biomass and carbon , 2010 .

[22]  Warren B. Cohen,et al.  Detecting trends in forest disturbance and recovery using yearly Landsat time series: 2. TimeSync — Tools for calibration and validation , 2010 .

[23]  M. Lefsky A global forest canopy height map from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer and the Geoscience Laser Altimeter System , 2010 .

[24]  Peter Bunting,et al.  Retrieving forest biomass through integration of CASI and LiDAR data , 2008 .

[25]  S. Goetz,et al.  Reply to Comment on ‘A first map of tropical Africa’s above-ground biomass derived from satellite imagery’ , 2008, Environmental Research Letters.