Improved GMM with parameter initialization for unsupervised adaptation of Brain–Computer interface

An important property of brain signals is their nonstationarity. How to adapt a brain–computer interface (BCI) to the changing brain states is one of the challenges faced by BCI researchers, especially in real application where the subject's real intent is unknown to the system. Gaussian mixture model (GMM) has been used for the unsupervised adaptation of the classifier in BCI. In this paper, a method of initializing the model parameters is proposed for expectation maximization-based GMM parameter estimation. This improved GMM method and other two existing unsupervised adaptation methods are applied to groups of constructed artificial data with different data properties. Performances of these methods in different situations are analyzed. Compared with the other two unsupervised adaptation methods, this method shows a better ability of adapting to changes and discovering class information from unlabelled data. The methods are also applied to real EEG data recorded in 19 experiments. For real data, the proposed method achieves an error rate significantly lower than the other two unsupervised methods. Results of the real data agree with the analysis based on the artificial data, which confirms not only the effectiveness of our method but also the validity of the constructed data. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Reinhold Scherer,et al.  A fully on-line adaptive BCI , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[2]  John Q. Gan SELF-ADAPTING BCI BASED ON UNSUPERVISED LEARNING , 2006 .

[3]  Stephen J. Roberts,et al.  Adaptive BCI based on variational Bayesian Kalman filtering: an empirical evaluation , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[4]  N. Birbaumer,et al.  The thought-translation device (TTD): neurobehavioral mechanisms and clinical outcome , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[5]  Reinhold Scherer,et al.  Study of On-Line Adaptive Discriminant Analysis for EEG-Based Brain Computer Interfaces , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[6]  M. Stokes,et al.  Probabilistic methods in BCI research , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[7]  J. Mourino,et al.  Asynchronous BCI and local neural classifiers: an overview of the adaptive brain interface project , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[8]  Rajesh P. N. Rao,et al.  Towards adaptive classification for BCI , 2006, Journal of neural engineering.

[9]  M J Stokes,et al.  EEG-based communication: a pattern recognition approach. , 2000, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[10]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Designing optimal spatial filters for single-trial EEG classification in a movement task , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[11]  A. Buttfield,et al.  Towards a robust BCI: error potentials and online learning , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[12]  Kazuyuki Aihara,et al.  Adapting Spatial Filter Methods for Nonstationary BCIs , 2006 .

[13]  Robert Oostenveld,et al.  The five percent electrode system for high-resolution EEG and ERP measurements , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[14]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Brain-Computer Interfaces for Communication and Control. , 2011, Communications of the ACM.

[15]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  Covariate Shift Adaptation by Importance Weighted Cross Validation , 2007, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[16]  G Pfurtscheller,et al.  Current trends in Graz Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) research. , 2000, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.