A noise-controlled free shear flow

The adjoint of the perturbed and linearized compressible viscous flow equations is formulated in such a way that its solution can be used to optimize control actuation in order to reduce flow-generated sound. We apply it to a direct numerical simulation of a randomly excited two-dimensional mixing layer, with inflow vorticity-thickness Reynolds number 500 and free-stream Mach numbers 0.9 and 0.2. The control actuation is implemented as general source terms in the flow equations (body forces, mass sources, and internal energy sources) with compact support near the inflow boundary. The noise to be reduced is defined by a space-time integral of the mean-square pressure fluctuations on a line parallel to the mixing layer in the acoustic field of the low-speed stream. Both the adjoint and flow equations are solved numerically and without modelling approximations. The objective is to study the mechanics of the noise generation and its control. All controls reduce targeted noise with very little required input power, with the most effective (the internal energy control) reducing the noise intensity by 11 dB. Numerical tests confirm that the control is not by any simple acoustic cancellation mechanism but instead results from a genuine change of the flow as a source of sound. The comparison of otherwise identical flows with and without control applied shows little change of the flow's gross features: the evolution and pairings of the energetic structures, turbulence kinetic energy, spreading rate, and so on are superficially unchanged. However, decomposition of the flow into empirical eigenfunctions, as surrogates for Fourier modes in the non-periodic streamwise direction, shows that the turbulence structures advect downstream more uniformly. This change appears to be the key to reducing their acoustic efficiency, a perspective that is clarified by comparing the randomly excited mixing layer to a harmonically excited mixing layer, which is relatively quiet because it is highly ordered. Unfortunately, from the perspective of any practical implementation with actuators, the optimized control identified has a complex spatial and temporal structure, but it can be simplified. Two empirical eigenmodes were required to represent it sufficiently to reduce the targeted noise intensity by about 50%. Optimization of a simple single-degree-of-freedom control with an ad hoc spatial structure is less effective.

[1]  Brian S. Thurow,et al.  DIFFERENCES IN DYNAMICS OF AN IDEALY EXPANDED MACH 1.3 JET DURING NOISE GENERATION AND RELATIVE QUIET PERIODS , 2004 .

[2]  Mingjun Wei Jet Noise Control by Adjoint-Based Optimization , 2004 .

[3]  M. E. Goldstein,et al.  A generalized acoustic analogy , 2003, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[4]  Tim Colonius,et al.  POD Analysis of Sound Generation by a Turbulent Jet , 2002 .

[5]  Roger Temam,et al.  DNS-based predictive control of turbulence: an optimal benchmark for feedback algorithms , 2001, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[6]  J. Freund Noise sources in a low-Reynolds-number turbulent jet at Mach 0.9 , 2001, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[7]  P. Moin,et al.  Direct computation of the sound generated by vortex pairing in an axisymmetric jet , 1995, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[8]  M. Glauser,et al.  The proper orthogonal decomposition of pressure fluctuations surrounding a turbulent jet , 1997, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[9]  Jonathan B. Freund,et al.  Proposed Inflow/Outflow Boundary Condition for Direct Computation of Aerodynamic Sound , 1997 .

[10]  C. Tam,et al.  Dispersion-relation-preserving finite difference schemes for computational acoustics , 1993 .

[11]  P. Holmes,et al.  The Proper Orthogonal Decomposition in the Analysis of Turbulent Flows , 1993 .

[12]  S. Lele Compact finite difference schemes with spectral-like resolution , 1992 .

[13]  Fazle Hussain,et al.  Direct evaluation of aeroacoustic theory in a jet , 1992, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[14]  Neil D. Sandham,et al.  Three-dimensional simulations of large eddies in the compressible mixing layer , 1991, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[15]  D. G. Crighton,et al.  Shear-layer pressure fluctuations and superdirective acoustic sources , 1990, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[16]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical recipes , 1990 .

[17]  L. Sirovich Chaotic dynamics of coherent structures , 1989 .

[18]  Reda R. Mankbadi,et al.  Sound generated aerodynamically revisited: large-scale structures in a turbulent jet as a source of sound , 1984, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[19]  J. Laufer,et al.  Noise generation by a low-Mach-number jet , 1983, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[20]  D. Crighton,et al.  Sound generation by instability waves in a low Mach number jet , 1983 .

[21]  Peter A. Monkewitz,et al.  Influence of the velocity ratio on the spatial instability of mixing layers , 1982 .

[22]  J. E. Ffowcs Williams,et al.  The noise from the large-scale structure of a jet , 1978, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[23]  D. G. Crighton,et al.  Basic principles of aerodynamic noise generation , 1975 .

[24]  A. Feinstein,et al.  Variational Methods for the Study of Nonlinear Operators , 1966 .

[25]  J. E. Ffowcs Williams,et al.  The noise from turbulence convected at high speed , 1963, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[26]  M. Lighthill On sound generated aerodynamically I. General theory , 1952, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[27]  M. C. O L O N I U S,et al.  Sound generation in a mixing layer , 2022 .

[28]  S. Lele,et al.  Turbulence interactions leading to far-field jet noise , 2022 .