Learning from web-based instructional systems and cognitive style

Two of the principal issues, which have been addressed in assessments of the benefits of web-based instructional systems, are firstly, whether the segmentation of information provided by the web structure aids users in apprehending the interrelationships between the units of information featured in the web. Secondly, whether providing the user with an overview of the web system assists in facilitating his/her learning. It is suggested in the present study that these two issues may be more effectively understood by a consideration of an individual's cognitive style. Fifty participants were assigned to one of two web-based instructional systems featuring information on the subject of psychological ethics. The information in one of the web systems was segmented to a greater degree than the information in the other. Half the participants using each web system were given an overview of the system and half were not. After a given time using the system, participants were tested on the information from the web. The findings suggest that cognitive style and segmentation had an effect on performance, although the provision of the overview had little effect. The results are discussed in terms of a consideration of cognitive style in the design of web-based instructional systems.

[1]  C. Tinajero,et al.  Field dependence‐independence and academic achievement: a re‐examination of their relationship , 1997 .

[2]  Jill H. Larkin,et al.  Learning From Electronic Texts: Effects of Interactive Overviews for Information Access , 1995 .

[3]  Richard Riding,et al.  Cognitive style, gender and learning from multi-media materials in 11-year-old children , 1999, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[4]  John Sweller,et al.  Cognitive Load During Problem Solving: Effects on Learning , 1988, Cogn. Sci..

[5]  R. Riding,et al.  The Effect of Pupil Cognitive Style and Position of Prose Passage Title on Recall , 1993 .

[6]  Andrew F. Krepinevich,et al.  And what to do about it , 1996 .

[7]  Ian J. Deary,et al.  The reliability of Riding’s Cognitive Style Analysis test , 2003 .

[8]  Richard J. Riding,et al.  The effect of cognitive style, age, gender and structure on the recall of prose passages , 1998 .

[9]  Mike Kibby,et al.  Rethinking university teaching: A framework for the effective use of educational technology: Diana Laurillard. Routledge, London (1993). 284pp. ISBN 0-415-09289-2 paperback £14.99; 0415-09288-4 hardback £37.50 , 1994 .

[10]  Nick Hammond,et al.  The Travel Metaphor as Design Principle and Training Aid for Navigating around Complex Systems , 1987, BCS HCI.

[11]  J. Sweller.  COGNITIVE LOAD THEORY, LEARNING DIFFICULTY, AND INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN , 1994 .

[12]  R. J. Riding,et al.  The assessment of verbal‐imagery learning styles and their effect on the recall of concrete and abstract prose passages by 11‐year‐old children , 1981 .

[13]  R. Riding,et al.  The effect of cognitive style and mode of presentation on learning performance. , 1993, The British journal of educational psychology.

[14]  Rosemary J. Stevenson,et al.  Spatial versus conceptual maps as learning tools in hypertext , 1999 .

[15]  Richard J. Riding,et al.  The relationship between extraversion and verbal-imagery learning style in twelve-year-old children , 1980 .

[16]  Nigel Ford,et al.  Individual differences, hypermedia navigation, and learning: an empirical study , 2000 .

[17]  R. Riding,et al.  Imagery Performance and Prose Comprehension in Seven‐year‐old Children , 1976 .