Revisiting non-linear functional brain co-activations: directed, dynamic and delayed

The center stage of neuro-imaging is currently occupied by studies of functional correlations between brain regions. These correlations define the brain functional networks, which are the most frequently used framework to represent and interpret a variety of experimental findings. In previous work we first demonstrated that the relatively stronger BOLD activations contain most of the information relevant to understand functional connectivity and subsequent work confirmed that a large compression of the original signals can be obtained without significant loss of information. In this work we revisit the correlation properties of these epochs to define a measure of nonlinear dynamic directed functional connectivity (nldFC) across regions of interest. We show that the proposed metric provides at once, without extensive numerical complications, directed information of the functional correlations, as well as a measure of temporal lags across regions, overall offering a different perspective in the analysis of brain co-activation patterns. In this paper we provide for a proof of concept, based on replicating and completing existing results on an Autism database, to discuss the main features and advantages of the proposed strategy for the study of brain functional correlations. These results show new interpretations of the correlations found on this sample.

[1]  M. Chun,et al.  Functional connectome fingerprinting: Identifying individuals based on patterns of brain connectivity , 2015, Nature Neuroscience.

[2]  J. Gore,et al.  Hemodynamic Response Function in Brain White Matter in a Resting State , 2020, Cerebral cortex communications.

[3]  Anish Mitra,et al.  Principles of cross-network communication in human resting state fMRI. , 2018, Scandinavian journal of psychology.

[4]  Mark D'Esposito,et al.  Variation of BOLD hemodynamic responses across subjects and brain regions and their effects on statistical analyses , 2004, NeuroImage.

[5]  Z. Yao,et al.  Resting-State Time-Varying Analysis Reveals Aberrant Variations of Functional Connectivity in Autism , 2016, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[6]  Wen-Ju Pan,et al.  The relationship between BOLD and neural activity arises from temporally sparse events , 2019, NeuroImage.

[7]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  The Variability of Human, BOLD Hemodynamic Responses , 1998, NeuroImage.

[8]  D. Rangaprakash,et al.  Aberrant hemodynamic responses in autism: Implications for resting state fMRI functional connectivity studies , 2018, NeuroImage: Clinical.

[9]  M. Raichle,et al.  Lag structure in resting-state fMRI. , 2014, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  Brain dynamics: Synchronous peaks, functional connectivity, and its temporal variability , 2021, Human brain mapping.

[11]  Khundrakpam Budhachandra,et al.  The Neuro Bureau Preprocessing Initiative: open sharing of preprocessed neuroimaging data and derivatives , 2013 .

[12]  Dante R Chialvo,et al.  On why a few points suffice to describe spatiotemporal large-scale brain dynamics , 2017 .

[13]  Matthew J. Brookes,et al.  Functional Connectivity in MRI Is Driven by Spontaneous BOLD Events , 2015, PloS one.

[14]  Catie Chang,et al.  Introducing co-activation pattern metrics to quantify spontaneous brain network dynamics , 2015, NeuroImage.

[15]  Ryan V. Raut,et al.  Global waves synchronize the brain’s functional systems with fluctuating arousal , 2021, Science Advances.

[16]  C. C. Gaudes,et al.  Periods of rest in fMRI contain individual spontaneous events which are related to slowly fluctuating spontaneous activity , 2013, Human brain mapping.

[17]  M. Raichle,et al.  Lag threads organize the brain’s intrinsic activity , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  D. Chialvo,et al.  Spontaneous BOLD event triggered averages for estimating functional connectivity at resting state , 2011, Neuroscience Letters.

[19]  Jie Zhang,et al.  Functional connectivity decreases in autism in emotion, self, and face circuits identified by Knowledge-based Enrichment Analysis , 2017, NeuroImage.

[20]  David A. Leopold,et al.  Dynamic functional connectivity: Promise, issues, and interpretations , 2013, NeuroImage.

[21]  Hemodynamic Deconvolution Demystified: Sparsity-Driven Regularization at Work , 2021, 2107.12026.

[22]  Daniele Marinazzo,et al.  Hemodynamic response function (HRF) variability confounds resting‐state fMRI functional connectivity , 2018, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[23]  Abraham Z. Snyder,et al.  The Lag Structure of Intrinsic Activity is Focally Altered in High Functioning Adults with Autism , 2015, Cerebral cortex.

[24]  Catie Chang,et al.  Decomposition of spontaneous brain activity into distinct fMRI co-activation patterns , 2013, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[25]  G. Cecchi,et al.  Scale-free brain functional networks. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[26]  M. V. D. Heuvel,et al.  Exploring the brain network: A review on resting-state fMRI functional connectivity , 2010, European Neuropsychopharmacology.

[27]  Enzo Tagliazucchi,et al.  The Voxel-Wise Functional Connectome Can Be Efficiently Derived from Co-activations in a Sparse Spatio-Temporal Point-Process , 2016, Front. Neurosci..

[28]  Yu Zhang,et al.  The Human Brainnetome Atlas: A New Brain Atlas Based on Connectional Architecture , 2016, Cerebral cortex.

[29]  Michael D Noseworthy,et al.  Attenuation of brain BOLD response following lipid ingestion , 2003, Human brain mapping.

[30]  Pablo Balenzuela,et al.  Criticality in Large-Scale Brain fMRI Dynamics Unveiled by a Novel Point Process Analysis , 2012, Front. Physio..

[31]  Gaël Varoquaux,et al.  Benchmarking functional connectome-based predictive models for resting-state fMRI , 2019, NeuroImage.

[32]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  High-amplitude cofluctuations in cortical activity drive functional connectivity , 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[33]  V. Calhoun,et al.  Tools of the trade: estimating time-varying connectivity patterns from fMRI data , 2020, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[34]  M. P. van den Heuvel,et al.  Exploring the brain network: a review on resting-state fMRI functional connectivity. , 2010, European neuropsychopharmacology : the journal of the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology.

[35]  N. Tzourio-Mazoyer,et al.  Automated Anatomical Labeling of Activations in SPM Using a Macroscopic Anatomical Parcellation of the MNI MRI Single-Subject Brain , 2002, NeuroImage.

[36]  J. Duyn,et al.  Time-varying functional network information extracted from brief instances of spontaneous brain activity , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[37]  E. Rolls,et al.  Autism: reduced connectivity between cortical areas involved in face expression, theory of mind, and the sense of self , 2015, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[38]  M. Raichle,et al.  How networks communicate: propagation patterns in spontaneous brain activity , 2016, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[39]  Guorong Wu,et al.  A blind deconvolution approach to recover effective connectivity brain networks from resting state fMRI data , 2012, Medical Image Anal..

[40]  Xi Chen,et al.  Point process analysis in brain networks of patients with diabetes , 2014, Neurocomputing.

[41]  D R Chialvo,et al.  Further results on why a point process is effective for estimating correlation between brain regions , 2020, Papers in Physics.

[42]  DecoGustavo,et al.  Time-Resolved Resting-State Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Analysis: Current Status, Challenges, and New Directions , 2017 .

[43]  Steven Laureys,et al.  Posterior Cingulate Cortex-Related Co-Activation Patterns: A Resting State fMRI Study in Propofol-Induced Loss of Consciousness , 2014, PloS one.

[44]  Xiao Liu,et al.  Co-activation patterns in resting-state fMRI signals , 2018, NeuroImage.

[45]  Q. Hu,et al.  Both Hypo-Connectivity and Hyper-Connectivity of the Insular Subregions Associated With Severity in Children With Autism Spectrum Disorders , 2018, Front. Neurosci..

[46]  Laura C. Buchanan,et al.  The spatial structure of resting state connectivity stability on the scale of minutes , 2014, Front. Neurosci..

[47]  Dante R. Chialvo,et al.  On the pros and cons of using temporal derivatives to assess brain functional connectivity , 2018, NeuroImage.

[48]  Jinglei Lv,et al.  Integrating group-wise functional brain activities via point processes , 2014, 2014 IEEE 11th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI).

[49]  Dimitri Van De Ville,et al.  The dynamic functional connectome: State-of-the-art and perspectives , 2017, NeuroImage.

[50]  Martin A. Lindquist,et al.  Modeling state-related fMRI activity using change-point theory , 2007, NeuroImage.