Assessing risk of bias in studies that evaluate health care interventions: recommendations in the misinformation age.

[1]  Carrie D. Patnode,et al.  Recommendations for assessing the risk of bias in systematic reviews of health-care interventions. , 2017, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[2]  Julian P T Higgins,et al.  Association Between Risk-of-Bias Assessments and Results of Randomized Trials in Cochrane Reviews: The ROBES Meta-Epidemiologic Study , 2017, American journal of epidemiology.

[3]  J. Higgins,et al.  Between-trial heterogeneity in meta-analyses may be partially explained by reported design characteristics , 2017, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[4]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  How to survive the medical misinformation mess , 2017, European journal of clinical investigation.

[5]  Quinn Grundy,et al.  ‘Spin’ in published biomedical literature: A methodological systematic review , 2017, PLoS biology.

[6]  M. Hernán,et al.  ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions , 2016, British Medical Journal.

[7]  Jelena Savović,et al.  Empirical Evidence of Study Design Biases in Randomized Trials: Systematic Review of Meta-Epidemiological Studies , 2016, PloS one.

[8]  Julian P. T. Higgins,et al.  Rethinking the assessment of risk of bias due to selective reporting: a cross-sectional study , 2016, Systematic Reviews.

[9]  Isabelle Boutron,et al.  Evaluation of the Cochrane tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized clinical trials: overview of published comments and analysis of user practice in Cochrane and non-Cochrane reviews , 2016, Systematic Reviews.

[10]  Isabelle Boutron,et al.  A revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized trials , 2016 .

[11]  Harlan M Krumholz,et al.  Increasing value and reducing waste: addressing inaccessible research , 2014, The Lancet.

[12]  David Moher,et al.  The evolution of assessing bias in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions: celebrating methodological contributions of the Cochrane Collaboration , 2013, Systematic Reviews.

[13]  P. Santaguida,et al.  Assessing the Risk of Bias of Individual Studies in Systematic Reviews of Health Care Interventions , 2012 .

[14]  Sergio Sismondo,et al.  Industry sponsorship and research outcome. , 2012, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[15]  J. Sterne,et al.  The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials , 2011, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[16]  J. Higgins Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration , 2011 .

[17]  Laura A. Levit,et al.  Finding what works in health care : standards for systematic reviews , 2011 .

[18]  D. Moher,et al.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. , 2010, International journal of surgery.

[19]  D. Altman,et al.  Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies , 2008 .

[20]  D. Bereczki,et al.  The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews , 2003 .