Hygromechanical properties of 3D printed continuous carbon and glass fibre reinforced polyamide composite for outdoor structural applications

Abstract The additive manufacturing of structural composites is a disruptive technology currently limited by its moderate mechanical properties. Continuous fibre reinforcements have recently been developed to create high performance composites and open up encouraging prospects. However, to increase their use, deeper understanding of the relationship between process and induced properties remains necessary. In addition, to apply these materials to engineering applications, it is of high importance to evaluate the effect of environmental conditions on their mechanical performances, particularly when moisture-sensitive polymer is used (PolyAmide PA for instance) which is currently lacking in the literature. This present article aims to investigate in more detail the relationship between the process, the mechanical behaviour and the induced properties of continuous carbon and glass fibres reinforced with a polyamide matrix manufactured using a commercial 3D printer. In addition, their hygromechanical behaviour linked to moisture effect is investigated through sorption, hygroexpansion and mechanical properties characterization on a wide range of relative humidity (10–98% Relative Humidity RH). The printing process induces an original microstructure with multiscale singularities (intra/inter beads porosity and filament loop). Longitudinal tensile performance shows that the reinforcing mechanism is typical of composite laminates for glass and carbon. However, the rather poor transverse properties are not well fitted by the Rule Of Mixture (ROM), thus underlining the specificity of the printing-induced microstructure and an anisotropic behaviour in the material. Non-negligible (5–6%) moisture uptake is observed at 98% RH, as well as orthotropic hygroscopic expansion of PA/carbon and PA/glass composites. The consequences of various moisture contents on mechanical properties are studied, showing a reduction of PA/carbon stiffness and strength of 25 and 18% in the longitudinal direction and 45 and 70% in the transverse direction. For PA/glass composites, we obtain a reduction in strength of 25% in the longitudinal direction, along with a 80% reduction of stiffness and 45% in strength in the transverse direction. A wetting/drying cycle underlines reversible phenomena in the longitudinal direction and mainly non-reversible degradation in the transverse direction.

[1]  É. Lolive,et al.  Characterization of sea water ageing effects on mechanical properties of carbon/epoxy composites for tidal turbine blades , 2015 .

[2]  Dichen Li,et al.  3D printed continuous fibre reinforced composite corrugated structure , 2018 .

[3]  Boming Zhang,et al.  Effects of cure cycles on void content and mechanical properties of composite laminates , 2006 .

[4]  E. Pérez-Pacheco,et al.  Effect of moisture absorption on the mechanical behavior of carbon fiber/epoxy matrix composites , 2013, Journal of Materials Science.

[5]  K. McDonnell,et al.  Fabrication of Continuous Carbon, Glass and Kevlar fibre reinforced polymer composites using Additive Manufacturing , 2017 .

[6]  Philippe Olivier,et al.  Effects of cure cycle pressure and voids on some mechanical properties of carbon/epoxy laminates , 1995 .

[7]  M.G. Pecht,et al.  Characterization of hygroscopic swelling behavior of mold compounds and plastic packages , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Components and Packaging Technologies.

[8]  W. Zhong,et al.  Short fiber reinforced composites for fused deposition modeling , 2001 .

[9]  Christophe Baley,et al.  Transverse Properties of Carbon Fibres by Nano-Indentation and Micro-mechanics , 2008 .

[10]  P. Gac,et al.  Moisture sorption in polyamide 6.6: experimental investigation and comparison to four physical-based models , 2015 .

[11]  C. Burtin,et al.  Effect of sea water and humidity on the tensile and compressive properties of carbon-polyamide 6 laminates , 2016 .

[12]  L. Love,et al.  Highly oriented carbon fiber–polymer composites via additive manufacturing , 2014 .

[13]  J. Thomason,et al.  Swelling of glass-fibre reinforced Polyamide 66 during conditioning in water, ethylene glycol and antifreeze mixture , 2011 .

[14]  Yuchuan Cheng,et al.  Properties of oriented carbon fiber/polyamide 12 composite parts fabricated by fused deposition modeling , 2018 .

[15]  B. Lauke,et al.  Mechanical behavior of carbon fiber reinforced polyamide composites , 2003 .

[16]  Dongxing Zhang,et al.  Influence of Voids on the Tensile Performance of Carbon/epoxy Fabric Laminates , 2011 .

[17]  J. Thomason,et al.  A method to measure the influence of humidity and temperature on the interfacial adhesion in polyamide composites , 2015 .

[18]  Dichen Li,et al.  3D printing for continuous fiber reinforced thermoplastic composites: mechanism and performance , 2017 .

[19]  Masahito Ueda,et al.  Fiber Line Optimization in Single Ply for 3D Printed Composites , 2016 .

[20]  W. Cong,et al.  Additive manufacturing of carbon fiber reinforced thermoplastic composites using fused deposition modeling , 2015 .

[21]  P. Wright,et al.  Anisotropic material properties of fused deposition modeling ABS , 2002 .

[22]  A. Todoroki,et al.  3D Printing of Continuous Carbon Fibre Reinforced Thermo-Plastic (CFRTP) Tensile Test Specimens , 2016 .

[23]  G. S. Park,et al.  Transport Principles—Solution, Diffusion and Permeation in Polymer Membranes , 1986 .

[24]  G. Ausias,et al.  Effect of flax fibres individualisation on tensile failure of flax/epoxy unidirectional composite , 2013 .

[25]  Michael F. Ashby,et al.  The mechanical properties of cellular solids , 1983 .

[26]  L. Cheng,et al.  Isothermal phase behavior of Nylon‐6, ‐66, and ‐610 polyamides in formic acid–water systems , 1994 .

[27]  R. T. L. Ferreira,et al.  Experimental characterization and micrography of 3D printed PLA and PLA reinforced with short carbon fibers , 2017 .

[28]  Wai Yee Yeong,et al.  Characterization of mechanical properties and fracture mode of additively manufactured carbon fiber and glass fiber reinforced thermoplastics , 2018 .

[29]  Dichen Li,et al.  Interface and performance of 3D printed continuous carbon fiber reinforced PLA composites , 2016 .

[30]  J. Segurado,et al.  Failure surface of epoxy-modified fiber-reinforced composites under transverse tension and out-of-plane shear , 2009 .

[31]  Robert Bogue,et al.  3D printing: the dawn of a new era in manufacturing? , 2013 .

[32]  Barry Berman,et al.  3D printing: the new industrial revolution , 2012, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[33]  N.-M. Barkoula,et al.  Fatigue Properties of Highly Oriented Polypropylene Tapes and All-Polypropylene Composites , 2008 .

[34]  A. Todoroki,et al.  Three-dimensional printing of continuous-fiber composites by in-nozzle impregnation , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[35]  Roberts Joffe,et al.  Effect of voids on failure mechanisms in RTM laminates , 1995 .

[36]  Yousuke Kouno,et al.  Fabrication and mechanical characterization of continuous carbon fiber-reinforced thermoplastic using a preform by three-dimensional printing and via hot-press molding , 2018 .

[37]  Xin Wang,et al.  3D printing of polymer matrix composites: A review and prospective , 2017 .

[38]  Syed H. Masood,et al.  Effects of Build Orientations on Tensile Properties of PLA Material Processed by FDM , 2014 .

[39]  A. Kashani,et al.  Additive manufacturing (3D printing): A review of materials, methods, applications and challenges , 2018, Composites Part B: Engineering.

[40]  L. Love,et al.  Structure and mechanical behavior of Big Area Additive Manufacturing (BAAM) materials , 2017 .

[41]  F. París,et al.  Characterization of 3D printed long fibre reinforced composites , 2018 .

[42]  D. Lin,et al.  A review on additive manufacturing of polymer-fiber composites , 2017 .

[43]  Anthony J. Favaloro,et al.  Fused filament fabrication of fiber-reinforced polymers: A review , 2018 .