Modeling repeated self-reported outcome data: a continuous-time longitudinal Item Response Theory model.

Item Response Theory (IRT) models have received growing interest in health science for analyzing latent constructs such as depression, anxiety, quality of life or cognitive functioning from the information provided by each individual's items responses. However, in the presence of repeated item measures, IRT methods usually assume that the measurement occasions are made at the exact same time for all patients. In this paper, we show how the IRT methodology can be combined with the mixed model theory to provide a longitudinal IRT model which exploits the information of a measurement scale provided at the item level while simultaneously handling observation times that may vary across individuals and items. The latent construct is a latent process defined in continuous time that is linked to the observed item responses through a measurement model at each individual- and occasion-specific observation time; we focus here on a Graded Response Model for binary and ordinal items. The Maximum Likelihood Estimation procedure of the model is available in the R package lcmm. The proposed approach is contextualized in a clinical example in end-stage renal disease, the PREDIALA study. The objective is to study the trajectories of depressive symptomatology (as measured by 7 items of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale) according to the time from registration on the renal transplant waiting list and the renal replacement therapy. We also illustrate how the method can be used to assess Differential Item Functioning and lack of measurement invariance over time.

[1]  Charles C. Driver,et al.  Bayesian continuous-time rasch models. , 2019, Psychological methods.

[2]  J. Craig,et al.  ‘Suspended in a paradox’—patient attitudes to wait‐listing for kidney transplantation: systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies , 2015, Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation.

[3]  F. Kendel,et al.  Illness representations, coping and anxiety among men with localized prostate cancer over an 18‐months period: A parallel vs. level‐contrast mediation approach , 2021, Psycho-oncology.

[4]  M. Chenel,et al.  Application of Item Response Theory to Model Disease Progression and Agomelatine Effect in Patients with Major Depressive Disorder , 2019, The AAPS Journal.

[5]  J. Ware,et al.  Random-effects models for longitudinal data. , 1982, Biometrics.

[6]  V. Joshi,et al.  What factors really matter? Health-related quality of life for patients on kidney transplant waiting list. , 2013, Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore.

[7]  Benoit Liquet,et al.  Estimation of extended mixed models using latent classes and latent processes: the R package lcmm , 2015, 1503.00890.

[8]  D. Commenges,et al.  Robust and Efficient Optimization Using a Marquardt-Levenberg Algorithm with R Package marqLevAlg , 2020, R J..

[9]  R. J. Mokken,et al.  Handbook of modern item response theory , 1997 .

[10]  E. Corruble,et al.  Progressive Increase of Anxiety and Depression in Patients Waiting for a Kidney Transplantation , 2010, Behavioral medicine.

[11]  P. Alam,et al.  H , 1887, High Explosives, Propellants, Pyrotechnics.

[12]  Steven W. Nydick,et al.  On Longitudinal Item Response Theory Models: A Didactic , 2020, Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics.

[13]  M. Sprangers,et al.  Integrating response shift into health-related quality of life research: a theoretical model. , 1999, Social science & medicine.

[14]  Pete Philipson,et al.  Faster Monte Carlo estimation of joint models for time-to-event and multivariate longitudinal data , 2020, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[15]  Charles C. Driver,et al.  The Role of Time in the Quest for Understanding Psychological Mechanisms , 2018, Multivariate behavioral research.

[16]  Longitudinal Analysis of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Clinical Trials: Applications of Multilevel and Multidimensional Item Response Theory , 2021, Psychometrika.

[17]  V. Sébille,et al.  Comparison of longitudinal quality of life outcomes in preemptive and dialyzed patients on waiting list for kidney transplantation , 2019, Quality of Life Research.

[18]  J. Twisk,et al.  Why item response theory should be used for longitudinal questionnaire data analysis in medical research , 2015, BMC Medical Research Methodology.

[19]  Miss A.O. Penney (b) , 1974, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[20]  R. Snaith,et al.  The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale , 1983 .

[21]  F. Samejima Graded Response Model , 1997 .

[22]  C. Lavergne,et al.  Item response models for the longitudinal analysis of health-related quality of life in cancer clinical trials , 2016, BMC Medical Research Methodology.

[23]  Hélène Jacqmin-Gadda,et al.  A Nonlinear Model with Latent Process for Cognitive Evolution Using Multivariate Longitudinal Data , 2006, Biometrics.

[24]  A. Koning,et al.  Prospective , 1882, Atlanta medical register.

[25]  J. Dartigues,et al.  Natural History of Dependency in the Elderly: A 24-Year Population-Based Study Using a Longitudinal Item Response Theory Model. , 2016, American journal of epidemiology.

[26]  J. Gómez-Benito,et al.  Assessing Cognitive Abilities Using the WAIS-IV: An Item Response Theory Approach , 2021, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[27]  Bengt Muthén,et al.  Dynamic Structural Equation Models , 2018 .

[28]  Charles C. Driver,et al.  Continuous time structural equation modeling with R package ctsem , 2017 .

[29]  A. Krystal,et al.  Examining suicide assessment measures for research use: Using item response theory to optimize psychometric assessment for research on suicidal ideation in major depressive disorder. , 2021, Suicide & life-threatening behavior.

[30]  P. Alam ‘L’ , 2021, Composites Engineering: An A–Z Guide.

[31]  V. Sébille,et al.  Performance of a Rasch-based method for group comparisons of longitudinal change and response shift at the item level in PRO data: a simulation study , 2022, Methods.

[32]  Roderick J. A. Little,et al.  Modeling the Drop-Out Mechanism in Repeated-Measures Studies , 1995 .

[33]  Christine E. DeMars,et al.  Item Response Theory , 2010, Assessing Measurement Invariance for Applied Research.

[34]  M. Timmerman,et al.  Trajectories of fatigue, psychological distress and coping styles after mild traumatic brain injury: a six-month prospective cohort study. , 2021, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[35]  D. Andrich Rating scales and Rasch measurement , 2011, Expert review of pharmacoeconomics & outcomes research.

[36]  Olivier Rascol,et al.  Joint models for the longitudinal analysis of measurement scales in the presence of informative dropout. , 2022, Methods.

[37]  P. Alam ‘S’ , 2021, Composites Engineering: An A–Z Guide.

[38]  Tsuyoshi Murata,et al.  {m , 1934, ACML.

[39]  Cécile Proust-Lima,et al.  Analysis of multivariate mixed longitudinal data: a flexible latent process approach. , 2012, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.

[40]  Wang Banyue,et al.  Chapter 5 , 2003 .