Taking Science out of Organization Science: How Would Postmodernism Reconstruct the Analysis of Organizations?

Postmodernism, an intellectual movement that originated in the humanities, has received considerable attention in the organization theory literature. Because many scholars remain uncertain as to just what this controversial perspective is, the present article offers a straightforward explanation of postmodernism's basic themes. Additionally, the author attempts to provide some balance to the overwhelmingly sympathetic presentations of postmodernism in the organization theory literature by offering a critical assessment of how it would redirect the study of organizations. Consistent with an intellectual divide dating to the Enlightenment, while those engaged in "normal science" are concerned with the question of what is true, it appears that those who sympathize with postmodernism are addressing the question of what is good. Postmodernists, it is argued here, wish to engage in advocacy for values and preferences that they view as putting them in radical opposition to the status quo. To facilitate such advocacy they call for the repudiation of "modernism," in particular the key modernist notion that there is an objective truth that can be sought out rationally and systematically. Postmodernists adopt, instead, a relativist philosophy, which contends that "truth" must be considered merely subjective, such that one's view of truth is only relative to one's circumstances. Although taking the position that no one can say what is or is not "true" puts them in opposition to mainstream science, it supports their ability to discredit views they oppose, and simultaneously provides a defense against those who would claim that the postmodernist's view is not "true." Whether the postmodernist approach has the potential to enhance our understanding of organizations is addressed here by examining its philosophical and historical roots, the research and theory that it has so far inspired, and the critical commentary on our field that its adherents have offered.

[1]  Joy Hendry,et al.  Crafting Selves: Power, Gender, and Discourses of Identity in a Japanese Workplace. DORINNE K. KONDO , 1992 .

[2]  K. Boulding Evidences for an Administrative Science: A Review of the Administrative Science Quarterly, Volumes 1 and 2 , 1958 .

[3]  THEORY DEVELOPMENT FORUM: NEW INTELLECTUAL CURRENTS IN ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT THEORY. , 1992 .

[4]  Paul Jeffcutt,et al.  THE INTERPRETATION OF ORGANIZATION: A CONTEMPORARY ANALYSIS AND CRITIQUE* , 1994 .

[5]  R. Collins Sociology: Proscience or Antiscience? , 1989 .

[6]  Ajay Mehra,et al.  Postmodernism and Organizational Research , 1997 .

[7]  Gibson Burrell,et al.  Modernism, Postmodernism and Organizational Analysis 4: The Contribution of Jürgen Habermas , 1994 .

[8]  Robert N. Stern,et al.  Organizations and Social Systems: Organization Theory's Neglected Mandate. , 1996 .

[9]  A. Meyer,et al.  Comment: The Concept of Ideology in Organizational Analysis , 1988 .

[10]  J. Cassell The Woman in the Surgeon's Body: Understanding Difference , 1996 .

[11]  Peter J. Frost,et al.  The Organizational Culture War Games: A Struggle for Intellectual Dominance , 1999 .

[12]  Gibson Burrell,et al.  Modernism, Post Modernism and Organizational Analysis 2: The Contribution of Michel Foucault , 1988 .

[13]  C. Calloway,et al.  The World Turned Upside Down , 1994 .

[14]  R. Burt Social Contagion and Innovation: Cohesion versus Structural Equivalence , 1987, American Journal of Sociology.

[15]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  The Evolution of Organization Analysis in ASQ, 1959-1979. , 1980 .

[16]  Alan D. Sokal,et al.  Transgressing the Boundaries: Toward a Transformative Hermeneutics of Quantum Gravity , 1996 .

[17]  S. Deetz Discursive Formations, Strategized Subordination and Self-Surveillance , 1998 .

[18]  David M. Boje,et al.  STORIES OF THE STORYTELLING ORGANIZATION: A POSTMODERN ANALYSIS OF DISNEY AS "TAMARA-LAND" , 1995 .

[19]  I. Wallerstein Social Science and the Quest for a Just Society1 , 1997, American Journal of Sociology.

[20]  Stewart Clegg,et al.  Handbook of organization studies , 1997 .

[21]  John Van Maanen,et al.  Representation in ethnography , 1996 .

[22]  E. Sampson Status Congruence and Cognitive Consistency , 1963 .

[23]  J. Coleman,et al.  Medical Innovation: A Diffusion Study. , 1967 .

[24]  Martin Parker,et al.  Critique in the Name of What? Postmodernism and Critical Approaches to Organization , 1995 .

[25]  Dennis A. Gioia,et al.  Multiparadigm Perspectives on Theory Building , 1990 .

[26]  Peggy Kamuf,et al.  Biodegradables Seven Diary Fragments , 1989, Critical Inquiry.

[27]  Stuart N. Adams Status Congruency as a Variable in Small Group Performance , 1953 .

[28]  Steven E. Aschheim The Nietzsche Legacy in Germany 1890-1990 , 1993 .

[29]  L. Gilmore Autobiographics: A Feminist Theory of Women's Self-Representation , 1994 .

[30]  Mayer N. Zald,et al.  Organization Studies as a Scientific and Humanistic Enterprise: Toward a Reconceptualization of the Foundations of the Field , 1993 .

[31]  J. V. Maanen,et al.  Crossroads Style as Theory , 1995 .

[32]  K. Mannheim Ideology and Utopia , 1941 .

[33]  Struan Jacobs,et al.  Book Reviews : James F. Harris, Against Relativism: A Philosophical Defence of Method. Open Court Press, Lasalle, IL, 1992. Pp. xvii, 223. Cloth, $54.95; Paper, $19.95 (Canadian dollars , 1997 .

[34]  A. Oberschall Empirical Social Research in Germany, 1848-1914 , 1965 .

[35]  W. Nord,et al.  The Bloodless Coup: The Infiltration of Organization Science by Uncertainty and Values , 1996 .

[36]  Robert P. Gephart,et al.  Postmodern Management and Organization Theory , 1996 .

[37]  S. Clegg Modern Organizations: Organization Studies in the Postmodern World , 1990 .

[38]  Richard Marsden,et al.  The Owl of Minerva: Reflections on Theory in Practice , 1999 .

[39]  Ramona L. Paetzold,et al.  PFEFFER'S Barriers to The Advance Of Organizational Science: A Rejoinder , 1994 .

[40]  M. Foucault The History of Sexuality , 1976 .

[41]  P. Rosenau Post-Modernism and the Social Sciences , 1991 .

[42]  K. Mannheim,et al.  Ideology and Utopia. , 1940 .

[43]  P. Man,et al.  Critical Writings, 1953-1978 , 1989 .

[44]  Martin Parker,et al.  Postmodernism and organizations , 1995 .

[45]  P. Berger,et al.  The Social Construction of Reality , 1966 .

[46]  B. Agger Critical Theory, Poststructuralism, Postmodernism: Their Sociological Relevance , 1991 .

[47]  D. Polkinghorne,et al.  Redefining the science-practice relationship and professional training. , 1992, The American psychologist.

[48]  Stewart Clegg,et al.  Managing in the Postmodern World: America's Revolution Against Exploitation , 1993 .

[49]  Hugh Willmott,et al.  Accounting for Teamwork: A Critical Study of Group-Based Systems of Organizational Control. , 1998 .

[50]  J. Singer,et al.  Cognitive, social, and physiological determinants of emotional state. , 1962 .

[51]  David Knights,et al.  Organization Theory in the Age of Deconstruction: Dualism, Gender and Postmodernism Revisited , 1997 .

[52]  Pauline Marie Rosenau,et al.  Post-Modernism and the Social Sciences: Insights, Inroads, and Intrusions , 1991 .

[53]  Mark A. Mone,et al.  The Uniqueness Value and its Consequences for Organization Studies , 1993 .

[54]  A. Sokal,et al.  Revelation: A Physicist Experiments with Cultural Studies , 2000 .

[55]  R. Jacques Critique and Theory Building: Producing Knowledge “From the Kitchen” , 1992 .

[56]  Jennifer Robertson,et al.  Crafting Selves: Power, Gender, and Discourses of Identity in a Japanese Workplace , 1990 .

[57]  Mats Alvesson,et al.  Critical Theory and Postmodernism Approaches to Organization Studies , 1996 .

[58]  Nietzsche’s Prefiguration of Postmodern American Philosophy , 1981 .

[59]  Paul DiMaggio Comment on "What Theory is Not." , 1995 .

[60]  D. Mitrany Methodology of the Social Sciences , 1945, Nature.

[61]  Panos D. Alexakos Nietzsche On Truth and Philosophy , 1993 .

[62]  D. Sullivan,et al.  Theories and theory groups in contemporary American sociology , 1975 .

[63]  N. Mullins,et al.  Theories and Theory Groups in Contemporary American Sociology. , 1975 .

[64]  David Steingard Storytelling at Administrative Science Quarterly: Warding off the Postmodern Barbarians , 1996 .

[65]  Joanne D. Martin Deconstructing Organizational Taboos: The Suppression of Gender Conflict in Organizations , 1990 .

[66]  Stewart Clegg,et al.  Handbook of organization studies , 1997 .

[67]  J. Pfeffer Barriers to the Advance of Organizational Science: Paradigm Development as a Dependent Variable , 1993 .

[68]  G. Hegel,et al.  The Phenomenology of Spirit , 1979 .

[69]  J. Frank Literature from the Bible , 1963 .

[70]  J. Hassard Exploring the Terrain of Modernism and Postmodernism in Organization Theory , 1996 .

[71]  Richard M. Weiss,et al.  Response: Ideas, Interests, and the Social Science of Organizations , 1988 .

[72]  Tom Rockmore,et al.  Heidegger And Nazism , 1991 .

[73]  John M. Jermier Introduction: Critical Perspectives on Organizational Control. , 1998 .

[74]  P. Berger,et al.  Social Construction of Reality , 1991, The SAGE International Encyclopedia of Mass Media and Society.

[75]  Robert Cooper,et al.  Modernism, Post Modernism and Organizational Analysis 3: The Contribution of Jacques Derrida , 1989 .

[76]  L. Smircich,et al.  Afterward/After Words: Open(ing?) Spaces , 1992 .

[77]  W. Scott,et al.  The Mandate Is Still Being Honored: In Defense of Weber's Disciples , 1996 .

[78]  J. Habermas Die Moderne — ein unvollendetes Projekt , 1994 .

[79]  Peggy Kamuf,et al.  Like the Sound of the Sea Deep within a Shell: Paul de Man's War , 1988, Critical Inquiry.

[80]  Robert K. Merton,et al.  The Thomas Theorem and The Matthew Effect , 1995 .