Reduction of resident work hours seems from many perspectives a sensible idea, which is long over due. Long hours in training, a phenomenon which is rooted in a tradition of arduous labor on the behalf of patients and a sense of professional development, appears to many observers as little more than a form of sophisticated hazing that is indeed quite dangerous. Simply put, no one would fly on a plane in which a pilot in training had been awake for 30 hours, especially if the only justification was that this is the way pilots had always been trained, or that this was the only way the pilot could learn to be a pilot. Indeed, it would appear that one of the easiest targets for the emerging safety movement must be the hours that a resident works.
There is, however, a counter-argument. If we have residents working shorter hours and spending less time in the hospital, their patients will be covered by other doctors more frequently and there will be more …
[1]
David M Gaba,et al.
Patient safety: fatigue among clinicians and the safety of patients.
,
2002,
The New England journal of medicine.
[2]
M. Zinner,et al.
Surgical residencies: are we still attracting the best and the brightest?
,
2002,
Bulletin of the American College of Surgeons.
[3]
Debra F. Weinstein,et al.
Duty hours for resident physicians--tough choices for teaching hospitals.
,
2002,
The New England journal of medicine.
[4]
D A Asch,et al.
The Libby Zion case. One step forward or two steps backward?
,
1988,
The New England journal of medicine.
[5]
T. Brennan,et al.
Does Housestaff Discontinuity of Care Increase the Risk for Preventable Adverse Events?
,
1994,
Annals of Internal Medicine.
[6]
R. Steinbrook,et al.
The debate over residents' work hours.
,
2002,
The New England journal of medicine.