Comparison of embodied energy and environmental impact of alternative materials used in reticulated dome construction

Abstract The reticulated dome structure is a system composed of linear elements arranged in such a way that the forces are transferred in a three-dimensional manner. These dome structures require less amount of materials to be built when compared to continuous surface domes, thereby, reducing the embodied energy of the structure, i.e., the energy used in the manufacture and transportation of materials. However, selecting materials with high embodied energy can significantly impact the energy use and environmental impact of reticulated domes. In line with sustainable construction practices, use of materials that reduces overall embodied energy of the structure is desirable. This paper compares the embodied energy and related environmental impacts of four alternative materials used to construct these structures namely aluminum, steel, laminated veneer lumber, and laminated bamboo. To estimate the quantities required to construct the dome structure, a finite element-based structural analysis software, MSC Patran/Nastran was used. Using the estimated quantities of alternative materials, detailed life cycle inventory was performed using GaBi software. The results of the environmental impact assessment show that aluminum and steel have higher embodied energy when compared to the other two materials. Furthermore, the results show that bamboo has a negative global warming potential outperforming laminated veneer lumber option. Additionally, a simplified life cycle analysis tool, Athena Impact Estimator, was used to compare results obtained from GaBi analysis. Overall, the results indicate that the use of alternative materials can significantly reduce the embodied energy and provide environmentally sound options to address the current environmental challenges.

[1]  D. T. Wright,et al.  Membrane Forces and Buckling in Reticulated Shells , 1965 .

[2]  Manuel J. Freire-Tellado,et al.  Double-layer space structures of laminated timber tubular members. , 1993 .

[3]  Hauz Khas,et al.  BAMBOO AS GREEN ALTERNATIVE TO CONCRETE AND STEEL FOR MODERN STRUCTURES , 2008 .

[4]  David Pearlmutter,et al.  A life-cycle energy analysis of building materials in the Negev desert , 2008 .

[5]  Isaac A. Meir,et al.  Thermal behavior of buildings with curved roofs as compared with flat roofs , 2003 .

[6]  Andrew H. Buchanan,et al.  Wood-based building materials and atmospheric carbon emissions , 1999 .

[7]  Samar R. Malek.  The effect of geometry and topology on the mechanics of grid shells , 2012 .

[8]  Shizuo Tsujioka,et al.  Development of the KT-wood space truss system with round timber as a new structural material , 2002 .

[9]  Ignacio Zabalza Bribián,et al.  Life cycle assessment of building materials: Comparative analysis of energy and environmental impacts and evaluation of the eco-efficiency improvement potential , 2011 .

[10]  Yan Xiao,et al.  Production, environmental impact and mechanical properties of glubam , 2013 .

[11]  Yan Xiao,et al.  Design and Construction of Modern Bamboo Bridges , 2010 .

[12]  Andrew H. Buchanan,et al.  Energy and carbon dioxide implications of building construction , 1994 .

[13]  B. V. Venkatarama Reddy,et al.  Embodied energy of common and alternative building materials and technologies , 2003 .

[14]  Guillaume Habert,et al.  Environmental impacts of bamboo-based construction materials representing global production diversity , 2014 .

[15]  Suresh,et al.  Analysis, Design and Construction of Steel Space Frames , 2002 .

[16]  Tien T. Lan,et al.  Space Frame Structures , 1998 .

[17]  A. Inés Fernández,et al.  Low carbon and low embodied energy materials in buildings: A review , 2013 .

[18]  Sanjay R. Arwade,et al.  Development of Laminated Bamboo Lumber: Review of Processing, Performance, and Economical Considerations , 2011 .

[19]  Z. S. Makowski,et al.  Analysis, design, and construction of braced domes , 1984 .

[20]  Robert Ries,et al.  Comparison of energy-based indicators used in life cycle assessment tools for buildings , 2014 .

[21]  I. Puente,et al.  Direct evaluation of the buckling loads of semi-rigidly jointed single-layer latticed domes under symmetric loading , 2007 .

[22]  Luis Sanchez Cuenca.  The stainless steel structure of a sport stadium in Quart , 2002 .

[23]  S. Rittironk,et al.  Investigating laminated bamboo lumber as an alternate to wood lumber in residential construction in the United States , 2008 .

[24]  R Harris,et al.  The structural engineering of the Downland Gridshell , 2001 .

[25]  Richard Harris.  Design of timber gridded shell structures , 2011 .

[26]  Wai-Fah Chen,et al.  Handbook of Structural Engineering , 1997 .

[27]  R. Cook,et al.  Concepts and Applications of Finite Element Analysis , 1974 .

[28]  Douglas John Harris,et al.  A quantitative approach to the assessment of the environmental impact of building materials , 1999 .

[29]  T. Okagawa,et al.  Wide-span structures using fire- and corrosion-resistant steel. , 1993 .

[30]  Catarina Thormark,et al.  The effect of material choice on the total energy need and recycling potential of a building , 2006 .

[31]  Arvind Chel,et al.  Performance of skylight illuminance inside a dome shaped adobe house under composite climate at New Delhi (India): A typical zero energy passive house , 2014 .

[32]  D. Tully.  A prefabricated long-span plywood/timber hyperbolic paraboloid in Dublin. , 1993 .

[33]  Mehdi N. Bahadori,et al.  Solar radiation on domed roofs , 2009 .

[34]  Rudolph Szilard.  Fundamentals of Stability Analysis , 2007 .

[35]  K. Ghavami,et al.  Bamboo: Low cost and energy saving construction materials , 2008 .

[36]  D. R. Griffiths,et al.  Preliminary tests on timber pole wire laced steel node space structures. , 1993 .

[37]  Khosrow Ghavami,et al.  Double-layer bamboo space structures. , 1993 .

[38]  David Carl Doran.  Toward the strength characterization of connections employed in reticulated structures , 1997 .