Numerical simulation and optimization of a direct methanol fuel cell

We examine a direct methanol fuel cell (DMFC) model that captures the essence of electrode kinetics and methanol crossover through the polymer electrolyte membrane. Model parameters and key factors for the DMFC model including methanol crossover are identified. Moreover, we establish a relationship between the methanol feed concentration and the power density at a given current density. To gain insight into the effect of the methanol feed concentration, we also performed sensitivity analysis between the cell voltage and the methanol feed concentration. From this sensitivity curve, we are able to identify the optimal feed concentration, which provides the highest power density output for a set value of the current density. Finally, the optimal response of the cell voltage to the change of the feed concentration is studied via dynamic optimization to the differential algebraic equation system. These dynamic optimization results provide a constant feeding strategy that achieves the highest power density at given operating conditions specified by a set current density.

[1]  M. Valentini,et al.  A Working Model of Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cells Comparisons Between Theory and Experiments , 2002 .

[2]  Shimshon Gottesfeld,et al.  Methanol transport through Nafion membranes : Electro-osmotic drag effects on potential step measurements , 2000 .

[3]  L. Biegler,et al.  A reduced space interior point strategy for optimization of differential algebraic systems , 2000 .

[4]  Jeremy P. Meyers,et al.  Simulation of the Direct Methanol Fuel Cell I. Thermodynamic Framework for a Multicomponent Membrane , 2002 .

[5]  Mark W. Verbrugge,et al.  A Mathematical Model of the Solid‐Polymer‐Electrolyte Fuel Cell , 1992 .

[6]  Kai Sundmacher,et al.  Dynamics of the direct methanol fuel cell (DMFC): experiments and model-based analysis , 2001 .

[7]  Lorenz T. Biegler,et al.  A Trust Region SQP Algorithm for Equality Constrained Parameter Estimation with Simple Parameter Bounds , 2004, Comput. Optim. Appl..

[8]  Lorenz T. Biegler,et al.  Dynamic optimization of the Tennessee Eastman process using the OptControlCentre , 2003, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[9]  R. Sargent,et al.  Solution of a Class of Multistage Dynamic Optimization Problems. 2. Problems with Path Constraints , 1994 .

[10]  J. Divisek,et al.  Process engineering of the direct methanol fuel cell , 2000 .

[11]  Ralph E. White,et al.  Methanol Fuel Cell Model: Anode , 1999 .

[12]  Jeremy P. Meyers,et al.  Simulation of the Direct Methanol Fuel Cell III. Design and Optimization , 2002 .

[13]  L. Petzold,et al.  Sensitivity analysis of differential-algebraic equations: A comparison of methods on a special problem ✩ , 2000 .

[14]  Kai Sundmacher,et al.  Analysis of the nonlinear dynamics of a direct methanol fuel cell , 2001 .

[15]  David A. Kendrick,et al.  GAMS : a user's guide, Release 2.25 , 1992 .