Feasibility of Physical Activity Assessment with Wearable Devices in Children Aged 4–10 Years—A Pilot Study

Objective Physical activity (PA) is associated with multiple beneficial health outcomes. Unfortunately, current studies report an alarming decrease of PA throughout all age groups. This study aims to assess general feasibility and PA levels of kindergarten and primary school children with wearable technology specifically manufactured for young children. Patients and methods From April 2017 to August 2017, a total of 59 children (7.1 ± 1.7 years, 34 girls) recorded their PA for seven consecutive day wearing a wearable bracelet (Garmin vivofit jr). Afterward, they filled out a short, child-oriented questionnaire to rate the feasibility. Results The general feasibility of the devices was rated as rather well regarding size, materials, and wearing comfort. Moreover, children achieved a mean of 83 ± 18 min of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) and 12.202 ± 2.675 steps per day on a weekly average. Therefore, 52 (88.1%) children, and almost all boys (96%), fulfilled the WHO criteria of 60 min of MVPA per day on a weekly average. Conclusion Wearables bracelets seem to be feasible devices for PA assessment even in young children. Nevertheless, their potential to increase PA for primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease, as well as the long-term compliance needs to be clarified in further studies.

[1]  Parmit K. Chilana,et al.  Acceptance of Commercially Available Wearable Activity Trackers Among Adults Aged Over 50 and With Chronic Illness: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation , 2016, JMIR mHealth and uHealth.

[2]  Scott J Strath,et al.  Accelerometer use with children, older adults, and adults with functional limitations. , 2012, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[3]  U. Ekelund,et al.  Global physical activity levels: surveillance progress, pitfalls, and prospects , 2012, The Lancet.

[4]  Michele Tarsilla,et al.  Mixed Methods Evaluation , 2015 .

[5]  Marsha Dowda,et al.  Compliance With National Guidelines for Physical Activity in U.S. Preschoolers: Measurement and Interpretation , 2011, Pediatrics.

[6]  A. Bauman,et al.  Physical activity and public health: updated recommendation for adults from the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Heart Association. , 2007, Circulation.

[7]  R. Furberg,et al.  Systematic review of the validity and reliability of consumer-wearable activity trackers , 2015, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity.

[8]  K. Moore,et al.  The use of Likert scales with children. , 2014, Journal of pediatric psychology.

[9]  Linda E Rohr,et al.  Accuracy of the vivofit activity tracker , 2016, Journal of medical engineering & technology.

[10]  J. Müller,et al.  Perzentile für den Body-mass-Index für das Kindes- und Jugendalter unter Heranziehung verschiedener deutscher Stichproben , 2001, Monatsschrift Kinderheilkunde.

[11]  Impact of the choice of threshold on physical activity patterns in free living conditions among adolescents measured using a uniaxial accelerometer: The HELENA study , 2014, Journal of sports sciences.

[12]  J. Lakerveld,et al.  Variation in population levels of physical activity in European adults according to cross-European studies: a systematic literature review within DEDIPAC , 2016, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity.

[13]  J. Bruce German,et al.  Wearing, Thinking, and Moving: Testing the Feasibility of Fitness Tracking with Urban Youth , 2016 .

[14]  L. Piwek,et al.  The Rise of Consumer Health Wearables: Promises and Barriers , 2016, PLoS medicine.

[15]  L. Sylvia,et al.  Practical guide to measuring physical activity. , 2014, Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics.

[16]  R. Pate,et al.  Physical Activity Assessment in Children and Adolescents , 2001, Sports medicine.

[17]  A. Bauman,et al.  CANPLAY study: Secular trends in steps/day amongst 5-19year-old Canadians between 2005 and 2014. , 2016, Preventive medicine.

[18]  B E Ainsworth,et al.  Comparison of three methods for measuring the time spent in physical activity. , 2000, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[19]  Mohamed Ismail Nounou,et al.  Are Currently Available Wearable Devices for Activity Tracking and Heart Rate Monitoring Accurate, Precise, and Medically Beneficial? , 2015, Healthcare informatics research.

[20]  Ulf Ekelund,et al.  Guide to the assessment of physical activity: Clinical and research applications: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. , 2013, Circulation.

[21]  Aaron S Kesselheim,et al.  FDA regulation of mobile health technologies. , 2014, The New England journal of medicine.

[22]  A. Timperio,et al.  A hitchhiker's guide to assessing sedentary behaviour among young people: deciding what method to use. , 2012, Journal of science and medicine in sport.

[23]  J. Lakerveld,et al.  Variation in population levels of sedentary time in European children and adolescents according to cross-European studies: a systematic literature review within DEDIPAC , 2016, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity.

[24]  U. Ekelund,et al.  What proportion of youth are physically active? Measurement issues, levels and recent time trends , 2011, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[25]  J. Lakerveld,et al.  Variation in population levels of physical activity in European children and adolescents according to cross-European studies: a systematic literature review within DEDIPAC , 2016, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity.

[26]  Christine Voss,et al.  Validity of Commercial Activity Trackers in Children With Congenital Heart Disease. , 2017, The Canadian journal of cardiology.

[27]  K. Price,et al.  Validation of the Fitbit One, Garmin Vivofit and Jawbone UP activity tracker in estimation of energy expenditure during treadmill walking and running , 2017, Journal of medical engineering & technology.

[28]  K. Patrick,et al.  Physical Activity and Public Health: A Recommendation From the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American College of Sports Medicine , 1995 .

[29]  H. Laerhoven,et al.  A comparison of Likert scale and visual analogue scales as response options in children's questionnaires , 2004, Acta paediatrica.