Transdiagnostic, Connectome-Based Prediction of Memory Constructs Across Psychiatric Disorders

Abstract Memory deficits are observed in a range of psychiatric disorders, but it is unclear whether memory deficits arise from a shared brain correlate across disorders or from various dysfunctions unique to each disorder. Connectome-based predictive modeling is a computational method that captures individual differences in functional connectomes associated with behavioral phenotypes such as memory. We used publicly available task-based functional MRI data from patients with schizophrenia (n = 33), bipolar disorder (n = 34), attention deficit hyper-activity disorder (n = 32), and healthy controls (n = 73) to model the macroscale brain networks associated with working, short- and long-term memory. First, we use 10-fold and leave-group-out analyses to demonstrate that the same macroscale brain networks subserve memory across diagnostic groups and that individual differences in memory performance are related to individual differences within networks distributed throughout the brain, including the subcortex, default mode network, limbic network, and cerebellum. Next, we show that diagnostic groups are associated with significant differences in whole-brain functional connectivity that are distinct from the predictive models of memory. Finally, we show that models trained on the transdiagnostic sample generalize to novel, healthy participants (n = 515) from the Human Connectome Project. These results suggest that despite significant differences in whole-brain patterns of functional connectivity between diagnostic groups, the core macroscale brain networks that subserve memory are shared.

[1]  Dustin Scheinost,et al.  Distributed Patterns of Functional Connectivity Predict Working Memory Performance in Novel Healthy and Memory-impaired Individuals , 2020, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[2]  Jessica A. Turner,et al.  Task-induced brain connectivity promotes the detection of individual differences in brain-behavior relationships , 2019, NeuroImage.

[3]  Brian D. Kiluk,et al.  Toward Addiction Prediction: An Overview of Cross-Validated Predictive Modeling Findings and Considerations for Future Neuroimaging Research. , 2019, Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging.

[4]  Dustin Scheinost,et al.  Combining multiple connectomes improves predictive modeling of phenotypic measures , 2019, NeuroImage.

[5]  Dustin Scheinost,et al.  A Mass Multivariate Edge-wise Approach for Combining Multiple Connectomes to Improve the Detection of Group Differences , 2019, CNI@MICCAI.

[6]  Dustin Scheinost,et al.  The Functional Brain Organization of an Individual Allows Prediction of Measures of Social Abilities Transdiagnostically in Autism and Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder , 2019, Biological Psychiatry.

[7]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Towards algorithmic analytics for large-scale datasets , 2019, Nature Machine Intelligence.

[8]  Satrajit S. Ghosh,et al.  Functional gradients of the cerebellum , 2018, bioRxiv.

[9]  Dustin Scheinost,et al.  The individual functional connectome is unique and stable over months to years , 2017, NeuroImage.

[10]  Simon B Eickhoff,et al.  BrainMap VBM: An environment for structural meta‐analysis , 2018, Human brain mapping.

[11]  Dustin Scheinost,et al.  Task-induced brain state manipulation improves prediction of individual traits , 2018, Nature Communications.

[12]  Ahmad R. Hariri,et al.  General functional connectivity: Shared features of resting-state and task fMRI drive reliable and heritable individual differences in functional brain networks , 2018, NeuroImage.

[13]  Paola Galdi,et al.  A distributed brain network predicts general intelligence from resting-state human neuroimaging data , 2018, bioRxiv.

[14]  Avshalom Caspi,et al.  All for One and One for All: Mental Disorders in One Dimension. , 2018, The American journal of psychiatry.

[15]  A. Holmes,et al.  The Myth of Optimality in Clinical Neuroscience , 2018, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[16]  B. J. Casey,et al.  Prediction complements explanation in understanding the developing brain , 2018, Nature Communications.

[17]  Dustin Scheinost,et al.  Connectome-based Models Predict Separable Components of Attention in Novel Individuals , 2018, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[18]  Dustin Scheinost,et al.  Resting-state functional connectivity predicts neuroticism and extraversion in novel individuals , 2018, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[19]  Saori C. Tanaka,et al.  A prediction model of working memory across health and psychiatric disease using whole-brain functional connectivity , 2017, bioRxiv.

[20]  Dustin Scheinost,et al.  Influences on the Test–Retest Reliability of Functional Connectivity MRI and its Relationship with Behavioral Utility , 2017, Cerebral cortex.

[21]  Dennis Norris,et al.  Short-Term Memory and Long-Term Memory are Still Different , 2017, Psychological bulletin.

[22]  A. Winkler,et al.  Schizophrenia Exhibits Bi-Directional Brain-Wide Alterations in Cortico-Striato-Cerebellar Circuits , 2017, bioRxiv.

[23]  Dustin Scheinost,et al.  Can brain state be manipulated to emphasize individual differences in functional connectivity? , 2017, NeuroImage.

[24]  Dustin Scheinost,et al.  Using connectome-based predictive modeling to predict individual behavior from brain connectivity , 2017, Nature Protocols.

[25]  P. Roelfsema,et al.  The Distributed Nature of Working Memory , 2017, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[26]  Krzysztof J. Gorgolewski,et al.  A phenome-wide examination of neural and cognitive function , 2016, Scientific Data.

[27]  M. Chun,et al.  A neuromarker of sustained attention from whole-brain functional connectivity , 2015, Nature Neuroscience.

[28]  A. Holmes,et al.  From phenotypic chaos to neurobiological order , 2015, Nature Neuroscience.

[29]  M. Chun,et al.  Functional connectome fingerprinting: Identifying individuals based on patterns of brain connectivity , 2015, Nature Neuroscience.

[30]  Angela R. Laird,et al.  Meta-analytic connectivity and behavioral parcellation of the human cerebellum , 2015, NeuroImage.

[31]  P. Fox,et al.  Identification of a common neurobiological substrate for mental illness. , 2015, JAMA psychiatry.

[32]  A. Etkin,et al.  A neurobiological approach to the cognitive deficits of psychiatric disorders , 2013, Dialogues in clinical neuroscience.

[33]  R. Buckner The Cerebellum and Cognitive Function: 25 Years of Insight from Anatomy and Neuroimaging , 2013, Neuron.

[34]  Essa Yacoub,et al.  The WU-Minn Human Connectome Project: An overview , 2013, NeuroImage.

[35]  Mark Jenkinson,et al.  The minimal preprocessing pipelines for the Human Connectome Project , 2013, NeuroImage.

[36]  T. Insel,et al.  Toward the future of psychiatric diagnosis: the seven pillars of RDoC , 2013, BMC Medicine.

[37]  M. Daly,et al.  Identification of risk loci with shared effects on five major psychiatric disorders: a genome-wide analysis , 2013, The Lancet.

[38]  Edward T. Bullmore,et al.  Drug research: A plan for mental illness , 2012, Nature.

[39]  E. Rolls,et al.  Cognitive dysfunction in psychiatric disorders: characteristics, causes and the quest for improved therapy , 2012, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[40]  T. Insel,et al.  Wesleyan University From the SelectedWorks of Charles A . Sanislow , Ph . D . 2010 Research Domain Criteria ( RDoC ) : Toward a New Classification Framework for Research on Mental Disorders , 2018 .

[41]  D. Caplan,et al.  Cognition, emotion and the cerebellum. , 2006, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[42]  M. Egan,et al.  Complexity of prefrontal cortical dysfunction in schizophrenia: more than up or down. , 2003, The American journal of psychiatry.

[43]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model selection and multimodel inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2003 .

[44]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model Selection and Multimodel Inference , 2003 .

[45]  A. Baddeley Cognitive psychology and human memory , 1988, Trends in Neurosciences.

[46]  Jana Vogel,et al.  Model Selection And Multimodel Inference , 2016 .