3D Generalized Inverse Beamforming in wind tunnel aeroacoustic testing: application to a Counter Rotating Open Rotor aircraft model

Abstract Inverse methods are gaining relevance in the aeroacoustic community for their capability to accurately localize and quantify noise sources. Indeed, since modern aircraft are more targeted to the reduction of fuel consumption, and very often some design choices, like Open Rotor (OR) propulsion systems, cause excessive acoustic emissions, accurate knowledge of noise source locations is of fundamental importance. This paper describes the use of an inverse method, namely Generalized Inverse Beamforming (GIBF), to characterize a Counter Rotating Open Rotor (CROR) installed on a 1/7th scale aircraft model. The model was tested in a large Low-Speed Wind Tunnel (WT) at The Pininfarina Aerodynamic and Aeroacoustic Research Center in Turin, Italy, within the framework of the FP7 EU Clean-Sky WENEMOR (Wind tunnel tests for the Evaluation of the installation effects of Noise EMissions of an Open Rotor advanced regional aircraft) project. With respect to previous works already published, the pros and cons of 3D GIBF formulation will be discussed on data collected from an industrial test case. A comparison of L 2 and L 1 norm formulations, as well as multiplicative approach and single array processing in 3D GIBF, will be performed, discussing their differences in terms of source localization accuracy. Since a quantitative analysis on real data cannot be provided because of confidentiality issues, the capability of the present approach to correctly quantify the source strength will be evaluated by considering a synthetic monopole source emitting white noise at different signal-to-noise-ratios (SNRs). Finally, it will be shown that 3D GIBF can provide engineers with more reliable data regarding the acoustic behavior of CROR-based aircrafts, this proving the advantages in exploiting this inverse method in WT aeroacoustic applications.

[1]  Yumei Bao,et al.  Three-dimensional localization of point acoustic sources using a planar microphone array combined with beamforming , 2018, Royal Society Open Science.

[2]  Q. Leclère,et al.  A review of acoustic imaging methods using phased microphone arrays , 2019, CEAS Aeronautical Journal.

[3]  Gert Herold,et al.  A Python framework for microphone array data processing , 2017 .

[4]  Paolo Chiariotti,et al.  Uncorrelated Noise Sources Separation Using Inverse Beamforming , 2015 .

[5]  P. Welch The use of fast Fourier transform for the estimation of power spectra: A method based on time averaging over short, modified periodograms , 1967 .

[6]  Zhigang Chu,et al.  Comparison of deconvolution methods for the visualization of acoustic sources based on cross-spectral imaging function beamforming , 2014 .

[7]  Gareth J. Bennett,et al.  The application of advanced beamforming techniques for the noise characterization of installed counter rotating open rotors , 2013 .

[8]  Paulo A. G. Zavala,et al.  Acoustic source identification using a Generalized Weighted Inverse Beamforming technique , 2012 .

[9]  Ennes Sarradj,et al.  Three-Dimensional Acoustic Source Mapping with Different Beamforming Steering Vector Formulations , 2012 .

[10]  Gareth J. Bennett,et al.  Experimental observations of an installed-on-pylon contra-rotating open rotor with equal blade number in pusher and tractor configuration , 2016 .

[11]  Thomas F. Brooks,et al.  Three-Dimensional Application of Damas Methodology for Aeroacoustic Noise Source Definition , 2013 .

[12]  Pieter Sijtsma,et al.  High-resolution CLEAN-SC: Theory and experimental validation , 2017 .

[13]  Paulo A. G. Zavala,et al.  Generalized inverse beamforming with optimized regularization strategy , 2011 .

[14]  K. Ehrenfried,et al.  Comparison of Iterative Deconvolution Algorithms for the Mapping of Acoustic Sources , 2007 .

[15]  Robert P. Dougherty JET NOISE BEAMFORMING WITH SEVERAL TECHNIQUES , 2010 .

[16]  Con J. Doolan,et al.  Three-dimensional beamforming of dipolar aeroacoustic sources , 2015 .

[17]  Christophe Schram,et al.  Benchmark Assessment of an Improved Regularization Technique for Generalized Inverse Beamforming , 2018, 2018 AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference.

[18]  Thomas Padois,et al.  Two and Three-Dimensional Sound Source Localization with Beamforming and Several Deconvolution Techniques , 2017 .

[19]  Mathew Legg,et al.  Comparison of CLEAN-SC for 2D and 3D Scanning Surfaces , 2012 .

[20]  Takao Suzuki L1 generalized inverse beam-forming algorithm resolving coherent/incoherent, distributed and multipole sources , 2011 .

[21]  Ennes Sarradj,et al.  Application of a Beamforming Technique to the Measurement of Airfoil Leading Edge Noise , 2012 .

[22]  Pieter Sijtsma,et al.  DETERMINATION OF ABSOLUTE LEVELS FROM PHASED ARRAY MEASUREMENTS USING SPATIAL SOURCE COHERENCE , 2002 .

[23]  John Kennedy,et al.  WENEMOR: Wind Tunnel Tests for the Evaluation of the Installation Effects of Noise Emissions of an Open Rotor Advanced Regional Aircraft , 2013 .

[24]  Robert P. Dougherty,et al.  Extensions of DAMAS and Benefits and Limitations of Deconvolution in Beamforming , 2005 .

[25]  Thomas F. Brooks,et al.  A Deconvolution Approach for the Mapping of Acoustic Sources (DAMAS) Determined from Phased Microphone Arrays , 2006 .

[26]  Philip A. Nelson,et al.  The application of inverse methods to spatially-distributed acoustic sources , 2013 .

[27]  Pieter Sijtsma,et al.  CLEAN Based on Spatial Source Coherence , 2007 .

[28]  Pieter Sijtsma,et al.  Spectral broadening by shear layers of open jet wind tunnels , 2014 .

[29]  Thomas F. Brooks,et al.  Extension of DAMAS Phased Array Processing for Spatial Coherence Determination (DAMAS-C) , 2006 .

[30]  Paolo Castellini,et al.  Acoustic beamforming for noise source localization – Reviews, methodology and applications , 2019, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing.