Mining information from event-related recordings

In this article we describe a signal-processing framework for mining information from event-related recordings. Pattern-analytic tools are combined with graph-theoretic techniques and signal understanding methodologies in a user-friendly environment with the scope of learning, parameterization, and representation of the ST data manifold. Through the first part, we provide a general outline of our methodological approach while trying to demonstrate all the different stages, where DM tools can be applied. In the second part, we provide a more detailed demonstration, give a synopsis of the obtained results and take the opportunity to underline the merits of the adopted algorithmic procedures. To enable the full justification of our framework, instead of just including a technical demonstration of some of the incorporated DM and KDD tools, we address the problem of response variability: an issue of great neuroscientific importance and the subject of continuous debate. The major question in all the previous studies was the validity of "signal plus noise" model, i.e., whether a stereotyped evoked response is linearly superimposed on the ongoing brain activity after every stimulus presentation, a prerequisite for the validity of ensemble-averaging. Using data from a simple visual experiment targeting at the early neuromagnetic response known as N70m, we try to bridge the gap between the "conservative-party" that suggests heavy averaging as the only way to study the brain's response and the "neurodynamics-party" that claims the averaged-signal has very little to say about how the real-time processing of an input from a sensory pathway is actually performed in the cortex.

[1]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Analysis and visualization of single‐trial event‐related potentials , 2001, Human brain mapping.

[2]  Vahe Poghosyan,et al.  Timing and connectivity in the human somatosensory cortex from single trial mass electrical activity , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[3]  A. Ioannides Real Time Human Brain Function: Observations and Inferences from Single Trial Analysis of Magnetoencephalographic Signals , 2001, Clinical EEG.

[4]  A. Fuchs,et al.  Spatiotemporal analysis of the neuromagnetic response to rhythmic auditory stimulation: rate dependence and transient to steady-state transition , 2002, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[5]  Thomas Martinetz,et al.  'Neural-gas' network for vector quantization and its application to time-series prediction , 1993, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[6]  B.H. Jansen,et al.  A fuzzy clustering approach to EP estimation , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[7]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Dynamic Brain Sources of Visual Evoked Responses , 2002, Science.

[8]  J. Martinerie,et al.  The brainweb: Phase synchronization and large-scale integration , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[9]  Witold Pedrycz,et al.  Data Mining Methods for Knowledge Discovery , 1998, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[10]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Algorithms for Clustering Data , 1988 .

[11]  A. A. Ioannides,et al.  Single-trial variability in early visual neuromagnetic responses: an explorative study based on the regional activation contributing to the N70m peak , 2003, NeuroImage.

[12]  Walter J. Freeman,et al.  Neurodynamics: An Exploration in Mesoscopic Brain Dynamics , 2000, Perspectives in Neural Computing.

[13]  Hiroshi Motoda,et al.  Feature Selection for Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining , 1998, The Springer International Series in Engineering and Computer Science.

[14]  Andreas A. Ioannides,et al.  Exploratory data analysis of evoked response single trials based on minimal spanning tree , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[15]  A. A Ioannides,et al.  The human primary somatosensory cortex response contains components related to stimulus frequency and perception in a frequency discrimination task , 2003, Neuroscience.

[16]  A. Grinvald,et al.  Dynamics of Ongoing Activity: Explanation of the Large Variability in Evoked Cortical Responses , 1996, Science.

[17]  Thomas Martinetz,et al.  Topology representing networks , 1994, Neural Networks.

[18]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  Identification of nonstationary dynamics in physiological recordings , 2000, Biological Cybernetics.

[19]  Dominique Hasboun,et al.  A multitrial analysis for revealing significant corticocortical networks in magnetoencephalography and electroencephalography , 2003, NeuroImage.

[20]  A Bezerianos,et al.  Robust moving averages, with Hopfield neural network implementation, for monitoring evoked potential signals. , 1997, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[21]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Brain-Computer Interfaces for Communication and Control. , 2011, Communications of the ACM.

[22]  J. Friedman,et al.  Graphics for the Multivariate Two-Sample Problem , 1981 .

[23]  N. Laskaris,et al.  Semantic geodesic maps: a unifying geometrical approach for studying the structure and dynamics of single trial evoked responses , 2002, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[24]  Axel Hutt,et al.  Analysis and modeling of quasi-stationary multivariate time series and their application to middle latency auditory evoked potentials , 2003 .

[25]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[26]  J.I. Aunon,et al.  Evoked potentials research , 1992, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[27]  Richard M. Leahy,et al.  Electromagnetic brain mapping , 2001, IEEE Signal Process. Mag..

[28]  F. L. D. Silva,et al.  Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: basic principles , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[29]  Andrzej Cichocki,et al.  Adaptive Blind Signal and Image Processing - Learning Algorithms and Applications , 2002 .

[30]  A A Ioannides,et al.  SOFIA: spatially optimal fast initial analysis of biomagnetic signals. , 1999, Physics in medicine and biology.