National research contributions: A case study on Finnish biomedical research

The long-term influence and contribution of research can be evaluated relatively reliably by bibliometric citation analysis. Previously, productivity of nations has been estimated by using either the number of published articles or journal impact factors and/or citation data. These studies show certain trends, but detailed analysis is not possible due to the assumption that all articles in a journal were equally cited. Here we describe the first comprehensive, longterm, nationwide analysis of scientific performance. We studied the lifetime research output of 748 Finnish principal investigators in biomedicine during the years 1966–2000, analysed national trends, and made a comparison with international research production. Our results indicate that analyses of the scientific contribution of persons, disciplines, or nations should be based on actual publication and citation counts rather than on derived information like impact factors. 51% of the principal investigators have published altogether 75% of the articles; however, the whole scientific community has contributed to the growth of biomedical research in Finland since the Second World War.

[1]  D. King.  The scientific impact of nations , 2004, Nature.

[2]  Ritu Sadana,et al.  Increasing International Gaps in Health-Related Publications , 2005, Science.

[3]  A J Macnab,et al.  A quantitative ranking of Canada's research output of original human studies for the decade 1989 to 1998. , 2000, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[4]  P. Seglen,et al.  Education and debate , 1999, The Ethics of Public Health.

[5]  R. Kostoff.  The (scientific) wealth of nations , 2004 .

[6]  F S Chew.  The scientific literature in diagnostic radiology for American readers: a survey and analysis of journals, papers, and authors. , 1986, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[7]  D Ugolini,et al.  Impact assessment of oncology research in the European Union. , 1999, European journal of cancer.

[8]  P Bourke,et al.  Mapping Australia's basic research in the medical and health sciences , 1997, The Medical journal of Australia.

[9]  W. Ansari,et al.  Geography of biomedical publications , 1999, The Lancet.

[10]  Ritu Sadana,et al.  Public health. Increasing international gaps in health-related publications. , 2005, Science.

[11]  Per O. Seglen,et al.  The Skewness of Science , 1992, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[12]  G S Mela,et al.  An overview of rheumatological research in the European Union , 1998, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[13]  Matthew E Falagas,et al.  Research contribution of different world regions in the top 50 biomedical journals (1995–2002) , 2006, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[14]  T. Luukkonen,et al.  Bibliometrics and evaluation of research performance. , 1990, Annals of medicine.

[15]  T. Opthof,et al.  Sense and nonsense about the impact factor. , 1997, Cardiovascular research.

[16]  Mônica G. Campiteli,et al.  An index to quantify an individual's scientific research valid across disciplines , 2005 .

[17]  W. Schaper,et al.  The international rank order of clinical cardiology. , 1996, European heart journal.

[18]  R. May.  The Scientific Wealth of Nations , 1997, Science.

[19]  Ruben Coronel,et al.  Impact factors: no totum pro parte by skewness of citation. , 2004, Cardiovascular research.

[20]  W. Weeks,et al.  Changes in authorship patterns in prestigious US medical journals. , 2004, Social science & medicine.

[21]  E. Favaloro,et al.  Medical research in New South Wales 1993–1996 assessed by Medline publication capture , 1998, The Medical journal of Australia.

[22]  Clemens Tempfer,et al.  Geography of biomedical publications in the European Union, 1990-98 , 1999, The Lancet.

[23]  Lauri Saxén.  Puoli vuosisataa lääketieteen tutkimusta Suomessa , 2000 .

[24]  Matthew E Falagas,et al.  Comparison of amount of biomedical research originating from the European Union and the United States , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[25]  J. E. Hirsch,et al.  An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output , 2005, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.

[26]  J. Álvarez-Sala,et al.  A bibliometric evaluation of European Union research of the respiratory system from 1987-1998. , 2001, The European respiratory journal.

[27]  J. Boldt,et al.  Which countries publish in important anesthesia and critical care journals? , 1999, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[28]  G Sperti,et al.  The ranking of Italy's publications in the biomedical field: an objective evaluation. , 1999, Cardiologia.