Stability of the prosthetic screws of three types of craniofacial prostheses retention systems

Objectives This study aimed to evaluate the stability of prosthetic screws from three types of craniofacial prostheses retention systems (bar-clip, ball/O-ring, and magnet) when submitted to mechanical cycling. Materials and Methods Twelve models of acrylic resin were used with implants placed 20 mm from each other and separated into three groups: (1) bar-clip (Sistema INP, São Paulo, Brazil), (2) ball/O-ring (Sistema INP), and (3) magnet (Metalmag, São Paulo, Brazil), with four samples in each group. Each sample underwent a mechanical cycling removal and insertion test (f=0.5 Hz) to determine the torque and the detorque values of the retention screws. A servo-hydraulic MTS machine (810-Flextest 40; MTS Systems, Eden Prairie, MN, USA) was used to perform the cycling with 2.5 mm and a displacement of 10 mm/s. The screws of the retention systems received an initial torque of 30 Ncm and the torque values required for loosening the screw values were obtained in three cycles (1,080, 2,160, and 3,240). The screws were retorqued to 30 Ncm before each new cycle. Results The sample was composed of 24 screws grouped as follows: bar-clip (n=8), ball/O-ring (n=8), and magnet (n=8). There were significant differences between the groups, with greater detorque values observed in the ball/O-ring group when compared to the bar-clip and magnet groups for the first cycle. However, the detorque value was greater in the bar-clip group for the second cycle. Conclusion The results of this study indicate that all prosthetic screws will loosen slightly after an initial tightening torque, also the bar-clip retention system demonstrated greater loosening of the screws when compared with ball/O-ring and magnet retention systems.

[1]  Atais Bacchi,et al.  Loosening torque of Universal Abutment screws after cyclic loading: influence of tightening technique and screw coating , 2015, The journal of advanced prosthodontics.

[2]  Yoon-Hyuk Huh,et al.  Effect of cyclic loading and retightening on reverse torque value in external and internal implants , 2015, The journal of advanced prosthodontics.

[3]  R. Ribeiro,et al.  Torque removal evaluation of prosthetic screws after tightening and loosening cycles: an in vitro study. , 2012, Clinical oral implants research.

[4]  H. Yılmaz,et al.  Retrospective study of treatment outcomes with implant-retained extraoral prostheses: survival rates and prosthetic complications. , 2010, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[5]  L. Correr-Sobrinho,et al.  Effect of retorque on loosening torque of prosthetic screws under two levels of fit of implant-supported dentures. , 2010, Brazilian dental journal.

[6]  B. Mattos,et al.  Magnetic retention and bar-clip attachment for implant-retained auricular prostheses: a comparative analysis. , 2008, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[7]  H. Yılmaz,et al.  Implant-retained auricular prostheses: an assessment of implant success and prosthetic complications. , 2008, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[8]  M. Şençimen,et al.  Auricular episthesis retained by an attachment system (2 case reports). , 2008, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[9]  A. Vissink,et al.  Fate of implant-retained craniofacial prostheses: life span and aftercare. , 2008, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[10]  D C Jagger,et al.  Implant-supported facial prostheses provided by a maxillofacial unit in a U.K. regional hospital: longevity and patient opinions. , 2005, Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists.

[11]  Kenneth G Boberick,et al.  Relationship between implant preload and screw loosening on implant-supported prostheses. , 2002, The Journal of oral implantology.

[12]  B R Lang,et al.  Examination of the implant-abutment interface after fatigue testing. , 2001, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[13]  D. Kozak,et al.  Effect of repeated closures on opening torque values in seven abutment-implant systems. , 2000, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[14]  M. Wichmann,et al.  Wear behavior of precision attachments. , 1999, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[15]  O. Fromentin,et al.  In vitro study of the retention and mechanical fatigue behavior of four implant overdenture stud-type attachments. , 1999, Practical periodontics and aesthetic dentistry : PPAD.

[16]  P P Binon,et al.  Evaluation of the effectiveness of a technique to prevent screw loosening. , 1998, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[17]  E A Patterson,et al.  Theoretical analysis of the fatigue life of fixture screws in osseointegrated dental implants. , 1992, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[18]  T Jemt,et al.  3-year followup study of early single implant restorations ad modum Brånemark. , 1990, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.