Mercury toxicity in plants

Mercury poisoning has become a problem of current interest as a result of environmental pollution on a global scale. Natural emissions of mercury form two-thirds of the input; manmade releases form about one-third. Considerable amounts of mercury may be added to agricultural land with sludge, fertilizers, lime, and manures. The most important sources of contaminating agricultural soil have been the use of organic mercurials as a seed-coat dressing to prevent fungal diseases in seeds. In general, the effect of treatment on germination is favorable when recommended dosages are used. Injury to the seed increases in direct proportion to increasing rates of application. The availability of soil mercury to plants is low, and there is a tendency for mercury to accumulate in roots, indicating that the roots serve as a barrier to mercury uptake. Mercury concentration in aboveground parts of plants appears to depend largely on foliar uptake of Hg0 volatilized from the soil. Uptake of mercury has been found to be plant specific in bryophytes, lichens, wetland plants, woody plants, and crop plants. Factors affecting plant uptake include soil or sediment organic content, carbon exchange capacity, oxide and carbonate content, redox potential, formulation used, and total metal content. In general, mercury uptake in plants could be related to pollution level. With lower levels of mercury pollution, the amounts in crops are below the permissible levels. Aquatic plants have shown to be bioaccumulators of mercury. Mercury concentrations in the plants (stems and leaves) are always greater when the metal is introduced in organic form. In freshwater aquatic vascular plants, differences in uptake rate depend on the species of plant, seasonal growthrate changes, and the metal ion being absorbed. Some of the mercury emitted from the source into the atmosphere is absorbed by plant leaves and migrates to humus through fallen leaves. Mercury-vapor uptake by leaves of the C3 speciesoats, barley, and wheat is five times greater than that by leaves of the C4 species corn, sorghum, and crabgrass. Such differential uptake by C3 and C4 species is largely attributable to internal resistance to mercury-vapor binding. Airborne mercury thus seems to contribute significantly to the mercury content of crops and thereby to its intake by humans as food. Accumulation, toxicity response, and mercury distribution differ between plants exposed through shoots or through roots, even when internal mercury concentrations in the treated plants are similar. Throughfall and litterfall play a significant role in the cycling and deposition of mercury. The possible causal mechanisms of mercury toxicity are changes in the permeability of the cell membrane, reactions of sulphydryl (-SH) groups with cations, affinity for reacting with phosphate groups and active groups of ADP or ATP, and replacement of essential ions, mainly major cations. In general, inorganic forms are thought to be more available to plants than are organic ones.Plants can be exposed to mercurials either by direct administration as antifungal agents, mainly to crop plants through seed treatment or foliar spray, or by accident. The end points screened are seed germination, seedling growth, relative growth of roots and shoots, and, in some case, studies of leaf-area index, internode development, and other anatomical characters. Accidental exposures occur through soil, water, and air pollution. The level of toxicity is usually tested under laboratory conditions using a wide range of concentrations and different periods of exposure. Additional parameters include biochemical assays and genetical studies. The absorption of organic and inorganic mercury from soil by plants is low, and there is a barrier to mercury translocation from plant roots to tops. Thus, large increases in mercury levels in soil produce only modest increases in mercury levels in plants by direct uptake from soil. Injuries to cereal seeds caused by organic mercurials has been characterized by abnormal germination and hypertrophy of the roots and coleoptile.Mercury affects both light and dark reactions of photosynthesis. Substitution of the central atom of chlorophyll, magnesium, by mercury in vivo prevents photosynthetic light harvesting in the affected chlorophyll molecules, resulting in a breakdown of photosynthesis. The reaction varies with light intensity. A concentration and time-dependent protective effect of GSH seems to be mediated by the restricted uptake of the metal involving cytoplasmic protein synthesis. Plant cells contain aquaporins, proteins that facilitate the transport of water, in the vacuolar membrane (tonoplast) and the plasma membrane. Many aquaporins are mercury sensitive, and in AQP1 a mercury-sensitive cysteine residue (Cys-189) is present adjacent to a conserved Asn-Pro-Ala motif. At low concentrations mercury has a toxic effect on the degrading capabilities of microorganisms. Sensitivity to the metal can be enhanced by a reduction in pH, and tolerance of mercury by microorganisms has been found to be in the order: total population > nitrogen fixers > nitrifiers. Numerous experiments have been carried out to study the genetic effects of mercury compounds in experimental test systems using a variety of genetic endpoints. The most noticeable and consistent effect is the induction of c-mitosis through disturbance of the spindle activity, resulting in the formation of polyploid and aneuploid cells and c-tumors. Organomercurials have been reported to be 200 times more potent than inorganic mercury. Exposure to inorganic mercury reduces mitotic index in the root-tip cells and increases the frequency of chromosomal aberrations in degrees directly proportional to the concentrations used and to the duration of exposure. The period of recovery after removal of mercury is inversely related to the concentration and duration of exposure.Bacterial plasmids encode resistance systems for toxic metal ions, including Hg2+, functioning by energy-dependent efflux of toxic ions through ATPases and chemiosmotic cationproton antiporters. The inducible mercury resistance (mer) operon encodes both a mercuric ion uptake and detoxification enzymes. In gram-negative bacteria a periplasmic protein,MerP, an inner-membrane transport protein,MerT, and a cytoplasmic enzyme, mercuric reductase, theMerA protein, are responsible for the transport of mercuric ions into cells and their reduction to elemental mercury, Hg(II). InThiobacillus ferrooxidans, an acidophilic chemoautotrophic bacterium sensitive to mercury ions, a group of mercury-resistant strains, which volatilize mercury, has been isolated. The entire coding sequence of the mercury-ion resistance gene has been located in a 2.3 kb fragment of chromosomal DNA (encoding 56,000 and 16,000 molecular-weight proteins) from strain E-l 5 ofEscherichia coli. Higher plants andSchizosaccharomyces pombe respond to heavy-metal stress of mercury by synthesizing phytochelatins (PCs) that act as chelators. The strength of Hg(II) binding to glutathione and phytochelatins follows the order: γGlu-Cys-Gly(γGlu-Cys)2Gly(γGlu-Cys)3Gly(γGlu-Cys)4Gly. Suspension cultures of haploid tobacco,Nicotiana tabacum, cells were subjected to ethyl methane sulfonate to raise mercury-tolerant plantlets. HgCl2-tolerant variants were selected from nitrosoguanidine (NTG)-treated suspension cell cultures of cow pea,Vigna unguiculata, initiated from hypocotyl callus and incubated with 18 ⧎g/ml HgCl2. Experiments have been carried out to develop mercury-tolerant plants ofHordeum vulgare through previous exposure to low doses of mercury and subsequent planting of the next generation in mercury-contaminated soil. Phytoremediation involves the use of plants to extract, detoxify, and/or sequester environmental pollutants from soil and water. Transgenic plants cleave mercury ions from methylmercury complexes, reduce mercury ions to the metallic form, take up metallic mercury through their roots, and evolve less toxic elemental mercury. Genetically engineered plants contain modified forms of bacterial genes that break down methyl mercury and reduce mercury ions. The first gene successfully inserted into plants wasmerA, which codes for a mercuric ion reductase enzyme, reducing ionic mercury to the less toxic elemental form.MerB codes for an organomercurial lyase protein that cleaves mercury ions from highly toxic methyl mercury compounds. Plants with themerB gene have been shown to detoxify methyl mercury in soil and water. Both genes have been successfully expressed inArabidopsis thaliana, Brassica (mustard),Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco), andLiriodendron tulipifera (tulip poplar). Plants currently being transformed include cattails, wild rice, andSpartina, another wetland plant. The problem of mercury contamination can be reduced appreciably by combining the standard methods of phytoremediation—removal of mercury from polluted areas through scavenger plants—with raising such plants both by routine mutagenesis and by genetic engineering. The different transgenics raised utilizing the two genesmerA andmerB are very hopeful prospects.

[1]  Rolf Hartung,et al.  Environmental mercury contamination. , 1972 .

[2]  C. Walsh,et al.  Enzymatic Reaction Mechanisms , 1978 .

[3]  R. Ferrara,et al.  Mercury distribution in maritime sediment and its correlation with the Posidonia oceanica prairie in a coastal area affected by a chlor‐alkali complex , 1989 .

[4]  D. Mortimer Freshwater aquatic macrophytes as heavy metal monitors — the Ottawa River experience , 1985, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[5]  G. Mhatre,et al.  Response of young plants to mercury , 1984 .

[6]  Norvald Fimreite,et al.  Mercury uses in Canada and their possible hazards as sources of mercury contamination , 1970 .

[7]  J. Shann,et al.  Phytotoxicity and accumulation of mercury in tobacco subjected to different exposure routes , 1995 .

[8]  M. Gadallah Interactive effect of heavy metals and temperature on the growth, and chlorophyll, saccharides and soluble nitrogen contents inPhaseolus plants , 1994, Biologia Plantarum.

[9]  R. Jervis,et al.  Waste water treatment for heavy metal toxins using plant and hair as adsorbents. , 1988, The Science of the total environment.

[10]  Jerome O. Nriagu,et al.  The Biogeochemistry of mercury in the environment , 1979 .

[11]  J. E. Sass Histological and cytological studies of ethyl mercury phosphate poisoning in corn seedlings , 1937 .

[12]  Humphrey John Moule Bowen,et al.  Environmental chemistry of the elements , 1979 .

[13]  B. B. Panda,et al.  Water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) to biomonitor genotoxicity of low levels of mercury in aquatic environment. , 1988, Mutation research.

[14]  Bioaccumulation of mercury and its effect on protein metabolism of the water hyacinth weevilNeochetina eichhornae (Warner) , 1990, Bulletin of environmental contamination and toxicology.

[15]  R. Seagull,et al.  Effects of methyl mercury on arrays of microtubules and macromolecular synthesis in Daucus carota cultures. , 1987, Ecotoxicology and environmental safety.

[16]  T. Kusano,et al.  Cloning and expression of Thiobacillus ferrooxidans mercury ion resistance genes in Escherichia coli , 1989, Journal of bacteriology.

[17]  M. Czuba Methyl mercury toxicity in plant cultures: modification of resistance and demethylation by light and/or 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid. , 1987, Ecotoxicology and environmental safety.

[18]  B. B. Panda,et al.  Allium micronucleus (MNC) assay to assess bioavailability, bioconcentration and genotoxicity of mercury from solid waste deposits of a chloralkali plant, and antagonism of L-cysteine. , 1989, The Science of the total environment.

[19]  M. Lodenius,et al.  Cadmium and mercury in macrofungi― mechanisms of transport and accumulation , 1989 .

[20]  K. Høiland Reaction of some decomposer basidiomycetes to toxic elements , 1995 .

[21]  P. Rasmussen Temporal Variation of Mercury in Vegetation , 1995 .

[22]  G. Fiskesjö The Allium test--an alternative in environmental studies: the relative toxicity of metal ions. , 1988, Mutation research.

[23]  M. Durrant,et al.  Sugar‐beet treatments, water supply and depth of sowing , 1992 .

[24]  Å. Iverfeldt Mercury in forest canopy throughfall water and its relation to atmospheric deposition , 1991 .

[25]  Shi-Hua Du,et al.  Catalase activity of C3 and C4 species and its relationship to mercury vapor uptake , 1983 .

[26]  I. Emerit,et al.  Peroxidation of lipids in corn plants exposed to heavy metal and herbicide stress. , 1993 .

[27]  P. Huang,et al.  Effects of oxygen concentrations on release of mercury from sediments and accumulation byCeratophyllum demersum andAnodonta grandis , 1988 .

[28]  P. Schramel,et al.  Concentrations of lead, cadmium, mercury and other elements in seeds of Lupinus mutabilis and of other legumes. , 1987, Journal of environmental pathology, toxicology and oncology : official organ of the International Society for Environmental Toxicology and Cancer.

[29]  L. Bakken,et al.  Microbial populations and activity in two soils of Tanzania as influenced by mercury , 1989 .

[30]  A. Panigrahi,et al.  Uptake and tissue distribution of mercury in some plant species collected from a contaminated area in India: Its ecological implications , 1986 .

[31]  K. Pahan,et al.  Stimulatory effect of phenylmercuric acetate and benzene on the growth of a broad spectrum mercury-resistant strain of Bacillus pasteurii , 1993 .

[32]  S. Tejning Mercury in Pheasants (Phasianus colchicus L.) Deriving from Seed Grain Dressed with Methyl and Ethyl Mercury Compounds , 1967 .

[33]  G. Keeler,et al.  The deposition of mercury in throughfall and litterfall in the lake champlain watershed: A short-term study , 1996 .

[34]  H. Ziegler,et al.  Effect of Sublethal Concentrations of Zinc, Cadmium and Mercury on the Photosynthetic Carbon Reduction Cycle of Euglena , 1993 .

[35]  G. Ellen,et al.  Heavy metals in vegetables grown in the Netherlands and in domestic and imported fruits , 1990, Zeitschrift fur Lebensmittel-Untersuchung und -Forschung.

[36]  The reversible reaction of tobacco mosaic virus ribonucleic acid and mercuric chloride. , 1962 .

[37]  John Leyden. Webb,et al.  Enzyme and metabolic inhibitors , 1963 .

[38]  S. Jana Accumulation of hg and cr by three aquatic species and subsequent changes in several physiological and biochemical plant parameters , 1988, Water, Air, and Soil Pollution.

[39]  J. Ruales,et al.  Content of fat, vitamins and minerals in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa, Willd) seeds , 1993 .

[40]  J. Nriagu,et al.  The analysis of vegetation for total mercury , 1991 .

[41]  A. Prasad,et al.  Porphyrin metabolism in lead and mercury treated bajra (Pennisetum typhoideum) seedlings , 1990, Journal of Biosciences.

[42]  R. Sivasubramanian,et al.  Physiological effects of heavy metals on Zea mays (maize) seedlings. , 1990 .

[43]  Roberto Bargagli,et al.  Determination of metal deposition patterns by epiphytic lichens , 1989 .

[44]  T. Sawidis,et al.  Effects of heavy metals on pollen tube growth and ultrastructure , 1995, Protoplasma.

[45]  T. Ristori,et al.  Preliminary study on mercury uptake by Rosmarinus officinalis L. (Rosemary) in a mining area (Mt. Amiata, Italy) , 1995, Bulletin of environmental contamination and toxicology.

[46]  S. Siegel,et al.  The phytotoxicity of mercury vapor , 1984 .

[47]  M. Coquery,et al.  Mercury uptake from contaminated water and sediment by the rooted and submerged aquatic macrophyte Eriocaulon septangulare , 1994 .

[48]  A. Sievers,et al.  Reversible Closure of Water Channels in Parenchymatic Cells of Sunflower Hypocotyl Depends on Turgor Status of the Cells , 1996 .

[49]  J. Tjell,et al.  Plant uptake of airborne mercury in background areas , 1988 .

[50]  J. Sock,et al.  Extracellular beta-1,3-Glucanases in Stem Rust-Affected and Abiotically Stressed Wheat Leaves : Immunocytochemical Localization of the Enzyme and Detection of Multiple Forms in Gels by Activity Staining with Dye-Labeled Laminarin. , 1990, Plant physiology.

[51]  P. Chandra,et al.  Bioaccumulation and Physiological Changes in Hydrilla verticillata (l.f.) Royle in Response to Mercury , 1996, Bulletin of environmental contamination and toxicology.

[52]  D. Krogmann,et al.  Inhibition of chloroplast reactions with phenylmercuric acetate. , 1972, Plant physiology.

[53]  S. Silver Bacterial resistances to toxic metal ions--a review. , 1996, Gene.

[54]  A. Wyttenbach,et al.  Na, Cl and Br in needles of norway spruce (P.Abies) and in the aerosol adhering to the needles∗ , 1989 .

[55]  D. R. Jackson,et al.  Atmospheric Emission and Plant Uptake of Mercury from Agricultural Soils near the Almadén Mercury Mine , 1979 .

[56]  H. Haapala,et al.  Accumulation of aluminum inHypogymnia physodes in the surroundings of a finnish sulphite-cellulose factory , 1995 .

[57]  S. Sinha,et al.  Bioaccumulation and biochemical effects of mercury in the plant Bacopa monnieri (L) , 1996 .

[58]  A. H. Ullah,et al.  Extracellular alpha galactosidase (E.C. 3.2.1.22) from Aspergillus ficuum NRRL 3135 purification and characterization. , 1990, Preparative biochemistry.

[59]  E. Semu,et al.  Uptake of Hg from203Hg-labeled mercury compounds by wheat and beans grown on an oxisol , 1985, Plant and Soil.

[60]  M. McBride Environmental Chemistry of Soils , 1994 .

[61]  R. Fyfe,et al.  Mercury contamination of Canadian prairie seed eaters and their avian predators , 1970 .

[62]  F. Baldi Mercury pollution in the soil and mosses around a geothermal plant , 1988, Water, Air, and Soil Pollution.

[63]  N. Kanematsu,et al.  Rec assay and mutagenicity studies on metal compounds. , 1980, Mutation research.

[64]  F. Küpper,et al.  Environmental relevance of heavy metal-substituted chlorophylls using the example of water plants , 1996 .

[65]  B. Chance,et al.  Energy and Electron Transfer Systems of Chlamydomonas reinhardi: II. Two Cyclic Pathways of Photosynthetic Electron Transfer in the Pale Green Mutant. , 1970, Plant physiology.

[66]  R. W. Weaver,et al.  Uptake of arsenic and mercury from soil by bermudagrass Cynodon dactylon , 1984 .

[67]  R. Carpentier,et al.  Mercury inhibition at the donor side of photosystem II is reversed by chloride , 1993, FEBS letters.

[68]  S. Silver,et al.  Bacterial heavy metal resistance: new surprises. , 1996, Annual review of microbiology.

[69]  P. Dubey,et al.  Occurrence of heavy metals in air and their accumulation by tropical plants growing around an industrial area , 1992 .

[70]  W. Weston,et al.  Seed Disinfection: I. An Outline of an Investigation on Disinfectant Dusts Containing Mercury. , 1935, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[71]  D. Godbold,et al.  Effect of zinc, cadmium and mercury on root elongation of Picea abies (Karst.) seedlings, and the significance of these metals to forest die-back , 1985 .

[72]  E. Merian,et al.  Metals and their compounds in the environment: Occurrence, analysis, and biological relevance , 1991 .

[73]  A O Summers,et al.  Phytoremediation of methylmercury pollution: merB expression in Arabidopsis thaliana confers resistance to organomercurials. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[74]  H. E. Braun,et al.  PERSISTENT ORGANIC AND INORGANIC PESTICIDE RESIDUES IN ORCHARD SOILS AND VINEYARDS OF SOUTHERN ONTARIO , 1976 .

[75]  E. Ochiai General Principles of Biochemistry of the Elements , 1987 .

[76]  R. J. Brown,et al.  Mutagenicity testing of certified food colors and related azo, xanthene and triphenylmethane dyes with the Salmonella/microsome system. , 1978, Mutation research.

[77]  D. Kostoff Effect of the Fungicide ‘Granosan’ on Atypical Growth and Chromosome Doubling in Plants , 1939, Nature.

[78]  D. Adriano Trace Elements in the Terrestrial Environment , 1986 .

[79]  R. V. Huystee,et al.  Effect of calcium, its inhibitors, and heavy metals on the growth cycle of peanut cell aggregates , 1993, Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture.

[80]  S. Moreshet EFFECTS OF PHENYL-MERCURIC ACETATE ON STOMATAL AND CUTICULAR RESISTANCE TO TRANSPIRATION , 1975 .

[81]  J. Låg,et al.  Regional Distribution of Mercury in Humus Layers of Norwegian Forest Soils , 1978 .

[82]  W. Grant,et al.  Cytological effects of the mercurial fungicide Panogen 15 on tradescantia and Vicia faba root tips , 1972 .

[83]  A. Fargašová,et al.  Effect of Pb, Cd, Hg, As, and Cr on germination and root growth of Sinapis alba seeds , 1994, Bulletin of environmental contamination and toxicology.

[84]  R. Mehra,et al.  Optical spectroscopic and reverse-phase HPLC analyses of Hg(II) binding to phytochelatins. , 1996, The Biochemical journal.

[85]  Y. Mizuguchi,et al.  The Genetic Effects of Environmental Pollutants on Eukaryotic Cells: ―Mutagenicity on Nuclear and Mitochondrial Genes of Yeast by Metals―@@@―金属の酵母核および細胞質性遺伝子に対する変異原性― , 1981 .

[86]  R. Purkayastha,et al.  Uptake and toxicological effects of some heavy metals on Pleurotus sajor-caju (Fr.) singer. , 1994, Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety.

[87]  A. Anderson,et al.  Accumulation of cadmium, mercury and lead by vegetables following long-term land application of wastewater. , 1986, Science of the Total Environment.

[88]  M. Zenk,et al.  Phytochelatins protect plant enzymes from heavy metal poisoning , 1992 .

[89]  Scott A. Merkle,et al.  Development of transgenic yellow poplar for mercury phytoremediation , 1998, Nature Biotechnology.

[90]  Gunnar F. Nordberg,et al.  Handbook on the Toxicology of Metals , 1979 .

[91]  G. Nordberg Effects and dose-response relationships of toxic metals : proceedings from an international meeting organized by the Subcommittee on the Toxicology of Metals of the Permanent Commission and International Association on Occupational Health, Tokyo, November 18-23, 1974 , 1976 .

[92]  K. G. Tiller,et al.  Sewage sludge as a soil amendment, with special reference to Cd, Cu, Mn, Ni, Pb and Zn— comparison of results from experiments conducted inside and outside a glasshouse , 1978 .

[93]  E. W. Macfarlane Cytological conditions in root tip meristem after gross antagonism of phenylmercuric poisoning. , 1953, Experimental cell research.

[94]  A O Summers,et al.  Mercuric ion reduction and resistance in transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana plants expressing a modified bacterial merA gene. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[95]  T. Clarkson The pharmacology of mercury compounds. , 1972, Annual review of pharmacology.

[96]  B. Singh,et al.  Uptake of zinc, cadmium, mercury, lead, chromium and nickel by ryegrass grown in a sandy soil , 1993 .

[97]  H. Gilbert Éléments nutritifs (N et P), métaux lourds (Zn, Cu, Pb et Hg) et productivité végétale dans un marais intertidal d'eau douce, Québec (Québec) , 1990 .

[98]  Eduard Farber The Evolution Of Chemistry: A History Of Its Ideas, Methods, And Materials , 1952 .

[99]  A. Sen,et al.  Salvinia natans — as the scavenger of Hg(II) , 1987 .

[100]  D. Brauer,et al.  The nature of proton‐translocating ATPases in maize roots , 1992 .

[101]  D. Godbold Mercury-induced root damage in spruce seedlings , 1991 .

[102]  J. Stewart,et al.  DISTRIBUTION OF MERCURY IN SASKATCHEWAN SOILS AND CROPS , 1974 .

[103]  A. Boudou,et al.  Experimental study of inorganic and methylmercury bioaccumulation by four species of freshwater rooted macrophytes from water and sediment contamination sources. , 1994, Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety.

[104]  T. Mirkov,et al.  The Plasma Membrane of Arabidopsis thaliana Contains a Mercury-Insensitive Aquaporin That Is a Homolog of the Tonoplast Water Channel Protein TIP , 1994, Plant physiology.

[105]  C. Chou,et al.  Inhibitory effects of heavy metals on seed germination and seedling growth of Miscanthus species. , 1992 .

[106]  S. Silver,et al.  Mercuric ion uptake by Escherichia coli cells producing Thiobacillus ferrooxidans merC. , 1996, Bioscience, biotechnology, and biochemistry.

[107]  G. Fiskesjö Some results from allium tests with organic mercury halogenides. , 2009, Hereditas.

[108]  S. Sheppard,et al.  A plant life-cycle bioassay for contaminated soil, with comparison to other bioassays: Mercury and zinc , 1993 .

[109]  A. Howlett,et al.  Nitric oxide stimulates the ADP-ribosylation of a 41-kDa cytosolic protein in Dictyostelium discoideum. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[110]  C. Ramel Geetic effects of organic mercury compounds. I. Cytological investigations on Allium roots. , 2009, Hereditas.

[111]  G. Mhatre,et al.  The effect of mercury on some aquatic plants , 1985 .

[112]  R. Yatscoff,et al.  DNA breakage caused by dimethyl mercury and its repair in a slime mould, Physarum polycephalum , 1975, Nature.

[113]  B. B. Panda,et al.  Residual mercury in seed of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) confers genotoxic adaptation to ethyl methanesulfonate, maleic hydrazide, methyl mercuric chloride and mercury-contaminated soil. , 1993, Mutation research.

[114]  D. Planas,et al.  Mercury concentration in tree rings of black spruce (Picea mariana Mill. B.S.P.) in boreal Quebec, Canada , 1995 .

[115]  T. Kusano,et al.  Nucleotide sequence of the Thiobacillus ferrooxidans chromosomal gene encoding mercuric reductase. , 1989, Gene.

[116]  Alma Marie Messing Shoot Chimeras After Exposure to Mercurial Compounds , 1953, Botanical Gazette.

[117]  D. Kostoff Atypical growth, abnormal mitosis and polyploidy induced by ethyl-mercury-chloride. , 1940 .

[118]  B. Maňkovská Mercury concentrations in forest trees from Slovakia , 1996 .

[119]  Morton W. Miller,et al.  Mercury, mercurials, and mercaptans , 1973 .

[120]  C. Gaggi,et al.  Mercury vapour accumulation in azalea leaves , 1991 .

[121]  P. Mohanty,et al.  Mercury Induces Alteration of Energy Transfer in Phycobilisome by Selectively Affecting the Pigment Protein, Phycocyanin, in the Cyanobacterium, Spirulina platensis : , 1991 .

[122]  Donald Hunter,et al.  The diseases of occupations , 2006 .

[123]  S. Jana,et al.  Effects of combinations of heavy metal pollutants on Cuscuta reflexa , 1988 .

[124]  D. Wolf,et al.  Purification and characterization of proteinase yscJ, a new yeast peptidase. , 1992, European journal of biochemistry.

[125]  S. De Flora,et al.  Genotoxicity of mercury compounds. A review. , 1994, Mutation research.

[126]  Z. Krupa,et al.  Some aspects of heavy metals toxicity towards photosynthetic apparatus-direct and indirect effects on light and dark reactions , 1995 .

[127]  R. Frank,et al.  METALS IN AGRICULTURAL SOILS OF ONTARIO. II. , 1976 .

[128]  B. B. Panda,et al.  Monitoring and assessment of mercury pollution in the vicinity of a chloralkali plant. IV. Bioconcentration of mercury in in situ aquatic and terrestrial plants at Ganjam, India , 1992, Archives of environmental contamination and toxicology.

[129]  B. B. Mishra,et al.  Accumulation of mercury byAzolla and its effect on growth , 1987, Bulletin of environmental contamination and toxicology.

[130]  A. Bradshaw,et al.  Toxic Metals in Soil-Plant Systems. , 1995 .

[131]  A. Summers Bacterial resistance to toxic elements , 1985 .

[132]  A. Crowder Acidification, metals and macrophytes. , 1991, Environmental pollution.

[133]  H. Kahle Response of roots of trees to heavy metals , 1993 .

[134]  W. C. Termeer,et al.  Bioavailability of As, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Hg, Mo, Ni, Pb, Se, and Zn from Biosolids Amended Compost , 1995 .

[135]  H. Kawai,et al.  Chemical Compositions of SHIITAKE Mushroom [Lentinus edodes (Berk.) SING.] Cultivated on Logs and Sawdust Substrate Beds and their Relations to Composition of the Substrate , 1993 .

[136]  W. A. Sexton Chemical constitution and biological activity , 1949 .

[137]  C. Ramel [Genetic effects of organic mercury compounds]. , 2009, Nordisk hygienisk tidskrift.

[138]  L. Goldwater Mercury in the environment. , 1971, Scientific American.

[139]  M. Lodenius,et al.  Influence of Acidification on Metal Uptake in Plants , 1990 .

[140]  A. Wild,et al.  Russell's Soil Conditions and Plant Growth , 1988 .

[141]  R. Simpson Association Constants of Methylmercuric and Mercuric Ions with Nucleosides , 1964 .

[142]  J. Lucena,et al.  Micronutrient content in graminaceous and leguminous plants contaminated with mercury , 1993 .

[143]  G. Hunsigi,et al.  Effect of growth regulators and cultural treatment on productivity of ratoon cane , 1994 .

[144]  A. Johnels,et al.  A history of mercury levels in Swedish fauna [Pollution]. , 1979 .

[145]  Ashutosh Kumar Singh,et al.  Cr and Hg toxicity assessed in situ using the structural and functional characteristics of algal communities , 1991 .

[146]  B. Chopade,et al.  High levels of multiple metal resistance and its correlation to antibiotic resistance in environmental isolates of Acinetobacter , 2004, Biometals.

[147]  A. K. Nanda,et al.  Acceleration of catalase and peroxidase activities in Lemna minor L. and Allium cepa L. in response to low levels of aquatic mercury. , 1991, Environmental pollution.

[148]  H. Ziegler,et al.  The Effect of Sublethal Concentrations of Zinc, Cadmium and Mercury on Euglena.Adenylates and Energy Charge , 1981 .

[149]  C. J. Cappon Uptake and speciation of mercury and selenium in vegetable crops grown on compost-treated soil , 1987 .

[150]  A. Boudou,et al.  Actions and interactions of temperature and photoperiod on mercury accumulation by Elodea densa from sediment source. , 1990, Ecotoxicology and environmental safety.

[151]  G F Nordberg,et al.  Effects and dose-response relationships of toxic metals : proceedings from an international meeting organized by the Subcommittee on the Toxicology of Metals of the Permanent Commission and International Association on Occupational Health, Tokyo, November 18-23, 1974 , 1976 .

[152]  H. Tajmir-Riahi,et al.  Do metal ions alter the protein secondary structure of a light-harvesting complex of thylakoid membranes? , 1995 .

[153]  B. B. Panda,et al.  Studies on the ability of water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) to bioconcentrate and biomonitor aquatic mercury. , 1990, Environmental pollution.

[154]  J A Heddle,et al.  The mutagenic activity of 61 agents as determined by the micronucleus, Salmonella, and sperm abnormality assays. , 1979, Canadian journal of genetics and cytology. Journal canadien de genetique et de cytologie.

[155]  J. Phipps,et al.  Toxicité génétique du chlorure de méthylmercure (CH3HgCl) sur les mitochondries de Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1983 .

[156]  A. Albert,et al.  Selective Toxicity , 1973, Springer US.

[157]  H. Tajmir-Riahi,et al.  Interaction of toxic metal ions Cd2+, Hg2+, and Pb2+ with light-harvesting proteins of chloroplast thylakoid membranes. An FTIR spectroscopic study , 1993 .

[158]  I. Mccracken,et al.  Mercury contamination of golf courses due to pesticide use , 1995, Bulletin of environmental contamination and toxicology.

[159]  Debraj Modak,et al.  Studies of toxic effects of Hg(II) on Pistia stratiotes , 1985 .

[160]  A. Samecka-Cymerman,et al.  Bioaccumulation of heavy metals by aquatic macrophytes around Wrocław, Poland. , 1996, Ecotoxicology and environmental safety.

[161]  T. Maitani,et al.  The Composition of Metals Bound to Class III Metallothionein (Phytochelatin and Its Desglycyl Peptide) Induced by Various Metals in Root Cultures of Rubia tinctorum , 1996, Plant physiology.

[162]  P. Pilet,et al.  Effect of Mercury on Growth and Gravireaction of Maize Roots , 1981 .

[163]  D. J. Bates,et al.  Influence of Disposal Environment on Availability and Plant Uptake of Heavy Metals in Dredged Material. , 1981 .

[164]  Wei Wang,et al.  EVALUATION OF METAL ION TOXICITY ON ROOT TIP CELLS BY THE ALLIUM TEST , 1995 .

[165]  Patricia A. D'ltri,et al.  Mercury contamination: A human tragedy , 1978 .

[166]  P. Pandey,et al.  Hg2+ uptake in a cyanobacterium , 1993, Current Microbiology.

[167]  Ashutosh Kumar Singh,et al.  Studies on Photosynthesis, the Associated Electron Transport System and Some Physiological Variables of Chlorella vulgaris Under Heavy Metal Stress , 1991 .

[168]  S. Singh,et al.  Assessment of Hg2+ toxicity to a N2-fixing cyanobacterium in long- and short-term experiments , 1992, Biometals.

[169]  J. V. van Elsas,et al.  Self-Transmissible Mercury Resistance Plasmids with Gene-Mobilizing Capacity in Soil Bacterial Populations: Influence of Wheat Roots and Mercury Addition , 1998, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[170]  P. Mohanty,et al.  Action of selected heavy metal ions on the photosystem 2 activity of the cyanobacteriumSpirulina platensis , 1995, Biologia Plantarum.

[171]  A. Jernelov,et al.  Sources transport and transformation of metals in the environment , 1986 .

[172]  P. Nuorteva,et al.  The influence of forest type, topographic location and season on the levels of Al, Fe, Zn, Cd and Hg in some plants in Southern Finland , 1988 .

[173]  A. Maclean,et al.  AMOUNTS OF MERCURY IN SOIL OF SOME GOLF COURSE SITES , 1973 .

[174]  J. Phipps,et al.  Quelques aspects de la toxicité génétique du méthylmercure chez les levures. , 1982 .

[175]  T. Mirkov,et al.  Characterization of a new vacuolar membrane aquaporin sensitive to mercury at a unique site. , 1996, The Plant cell.

[176]  T. Srikumar The mineral and trace element composition of vegetables, pulses and cereals of southern India , 1993 .

[177]  L. Friberg,et al.  Mercury in the environment - An epidemiological and toxicological appraisal , 1972 .

[178]  B. B. Panda,et al.  Mercury-tolerance ofChloris barbata Sw. andCyperus rotundus L. isolated from contaminated sites , 1993, Biologia Plantarum.

[179]  D. Penny,et al.  A contribution to the environmental biology of mercury accumulation in plants , 1987 .

[180]  Meetu Gupta,et al.  Role of glutathione and phytochelatin in Hydrilla verticillata (I.f.) royle and Valusneria spiraus L. under mercury stress , 1998 .

[181]  G. Brandi,et al.  Growth delay and filamentation of Escherichia coli wild-type and Rec A cells in response to hexavalent chromium and other metal compounds. , 1990, Mutation research.

[182]  L. Packer,et al.  Light-dependent volume changes and reactions in chloroplasts. I. Action of alkenylsuccinic acids and phenylmercuric acetate and possible relation to mechanisms of stomatal control. , 1965, Plant physiology.