Relations of relative scientometric indicators

Relative indicators are preferably used for comparative evaluation of thematically different sets of journal papers. The Relative Publication Strategy and Relative Subfield Citedness (RPS/RW) function referring to a set of papers selected was found to be identical with the Mean Expected Citation Rate and Mean Observed Citation Rate (MECR/MOCR) function.

[1]  Eugene Garfield,et al.  New factors in the evaluation of scientific literature through citation indexing , 1963 .

[2]  Markus von Ins,et al.  Bias, structure and quality in citation indexing , 2004, Scientometrics.

[3]  M. Amin,et al.  Impact factors: use and abuse. , 2003, Medicina.

[4]  Peter Vinkler,et al.  Relations of relative scientometric impact indicators. The relative publication strategy index , 1997, Scientometrics.

[5]  W. Glänzel,et al.  Scientometric indicators. A 32 country comparison of publication productivity and citation impact , 1985 .

[6]  Tibor Braun,et al.  Relative indicators and relational charts for comparative assessment of publication output and citation impact , 1986, Scientometrics.

[7]  John Weiner,et al.  Letter to the Editor , 1992, SIGIR Forum.

[8]  Peter Vinkler,et al.  Subfield problems in applying the Garfield (Impact) Factors in practice , 2002, Scientometrics.

[9]  Peter Vinkler,et al.  An attempt for defining some basic categories of scientometrics and classifying the indicators of evaluative scientometrics , 2001, Scientometrics.

[10]  Peter Vinkler.  Dynamic changes in the chance for citedness , 2004, Scientometrics.

[11]  Thed N. van Leeuwen,et al.  New bibliometric tools for the assessment of national research performance: Database description, overview of indicators and first applications , 1995, Scientometrics.

[12]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  A relational charting approach to the world of basic research in twelve science fields at the end of the second millennium , 2004, Scientometrics.

[13]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  A topographical approach to world publication output and performance in the sciences, 1981–1985 , 2005, Scientometrics.

[14]  Manfred Bonitz,et al.  Ranking of Nations and Heightened Competition in Matthew Core Journals: Two Faces of the Matthew Effect for Countries , 2002, Libr. Trends.

[15]  Peter Vinkler,et al.  Evaluation of some methods for the relative assessment of scientific publications , 1986, Scientometrics.