Multi-task logistic regression in brain-computer interfaces

A brain-computer interface (BCI) is used to enable communication between humans and machines by decoding elicited brain activity patterns. However, these patterns have been found to vary across subjects or even for the same subject across sessions. Such problems render the performance of a BCI highly specific to subjects, requiring expensive and time-consuming individual calibration sessions to adapt BCI systems to new subjects. This work tackles the aforementioned problem in a Bayesian multi-task learning (MTL) framework to transfer common knowledge across subjects and sessions for the adaptation of a BCI to new subjects. In particular, a recent framework, that is able to exploit the structure of multi-channel electroencephalography (EEG), is extended by a Bayesian hierarchical logistic regression decoder for probabilistic binary classification. The derived model is able to explicitly learn spatial and spectral features, therefore making it further applicable for identification, analysis and evaluation of paradigm characteristics without relying on expert knowledge. An offline experiment with the new decoder shows a significant improvement in performance on calibration-free decoding compared to previous MTL approaches for rule adaptation and uninformed models while also outperforming them as soon as subject-specific data becomes available. We further demonstrate the ability of the model to identify relevant topographies along with signal band-power features that agree with neurophysiological properties of a common sensorimotor rhythm paradigm.

[1]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  Learning From More Than One Data Source: Data Fusion Techniques for Sensorimotor Rhythm-Based Brain–Computer Interfaces , 2015, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[2]  Wojciech Samek,et al.  Transferring Subspaces Between Subjects in Brain--Computer Interfacing , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[3]  Moritz Grosse-Wentrup,et al.  Multisubject Learning for Common Spatial Patterns in Motor-Imagery BCI , 2011, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[4]  T.M. McGinnity,et al.  Comparative Analysis of Spectral Approaches to Feature Extraction for EEG-Based Motor Imagery Classification , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[5]  William J. Welch,et al.  Construction of Permutation Tests , 1990 .

[6]  Moritz Grosse-Wentrup,et al.  Multitask Learning for Brain-Computer Interfaces , 2010, AISTATS.

[7]  Cuntai Guan,et al.  Regularizing Common Spatial Patterns to Improve BCI Designs: Unified Theory and New Algorithms , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[8]  Radford M. Neal Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning , 2007, Technometrics.

[9]  Stephen J. Wright,et al.  Numerical Optimization (Springer Series in Operations Research and Financial Engineering) , 2000 .

[10]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  A Review of Performance Variations in SMR-Based Brain−Computer Interfaces (BCIs) , 2013 .

[11]  Vinay Jayaram,et al.  A Transfer Learning Approach for Adaptive Classification in P300 Paradigms , 2016 .

[12]  K. Müller,et al.  Predicting BCI performance to study BCI illiteracy , 2009, BMC Neuroscience.

[13]  Gabriel Curio,et al.  Brain-computer communication and slow cortical potentials , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[14]  M. Hestenes,et al.  Methods of conjugate gradients for solving linear systems , 1952 .

[15]  J R Wolpaw,et al.  Spatial filter selection for EEG-based communication. , 1997, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[16]  Touradj Ebrahimi,et al.  An efficient P300-based brain–computer interface for disabled subjects , 2008, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[17]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  Transfer Learning in Brain-Computer Interfaces , 2015, IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine.

[18]  G Calhoun,et al.  Brain-computer interfaces based on the steady-state visual-evoked response. , 2000, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.