Cross-cultural differences in decision-making styles: A study of college students in five countries

The major goal of this study was to explore cultural differences in decision-making styles of college students from five countries: Korea, Japan, China, the United States, and Canada. On the basis of previous scholarly findings, a questionnaire was developed and distributed to 837 college students in the five countries. Of these, 815 were included in the statistical analysis. Two hypotheses were established that examine five decision-making styles: cooperative, collaborative, avoidant, competitive, and dominant. The results provide only limited support for the hypotheses. Further, some results ran counter to the expectations of cultural variability. The findings of the study imply that culture may not be a stagnant phenomenon, and more variables should be explored to accurately evaluate cultural differences in decision-making styles. Scholars have suggested that the success of reaching the best possible decision or solution to a problem in interpersonal, intragroup, and intergroup situations depends on many factors. These include cohesiveness (Positive effect: Mullen, Anthony, Salas, & Driskell, 1995; Pavitt & Curtis, 1990; Negative effect: Galanes, Adams, & Brilhart, 2000), presence or absence of decisional conflict (Brilhart & Galanes, 1998; Pavitt & Curtis, 1990), gender (Byers, 1997), group size (Wood, Phillips, & Pedersen, 1992), group leadership (Patton, Giffin, & Patton, 1989; Ross, 1989), and goals or objectives (Hirokawa, 1992). Only a few studies and books, however, have dealt with how cultural characteristics influence decision-making and problem-solving styles in interpersonal and group interactions (e.g., Beebe & Masterson, 2000; Mann, 1986). Today, more than ever, North Americans - as well as people in or from the East - have a greater chance to interact with people from different cultures. During their interactions, people from individualistic cultures tend to value personal goals over group goals, personal concerns over group concerns, and personal rights and needs over collective responsibilities and obligations (Gudykunst et al., 1992; Triandis, 1996). In contrast, people from collectivistic cultures tend to value group goals over personal goals, group concerns over personal concerns, and collective needs over personal needs (Ayyash-Abdo, 2001). Because of these different value systems in societies, people of different cultural origin are likely to reveal different attitudes and styles of decision making in negotiation, bargaining processes, and problem solving in various social settings. CULTURAL DISTINCTIONS IN DECISION-MAKING STYLES Brilhart and Galanes (1989) present their view that "we (Americans) are competing with societies - Japanese, Chinese, and Korean - that are more skilled than we at collective decision making" (p. 260). This opinion appears to be particularly pertinent because people from collectivistic cultures, such as Japanese (Hendry, 1987; Okawara, 1982; Sours, 1982) and Korean (Brandt, 1971), prefer group decision by consensus with emphasis on cooperation, harmony, and interdependence in social life. On the other hand, people from individualistic cultures prefer decision by majority vote (Beebe & Masterson, 2000; Berry, Poortinga, Seagall, & Dasen, 1992) and place more importance on independence and the self (e.g., Ayyash-- Abdo, 2001; Triandis, 1996). Although consensus/unanimity is a desirable objective, it is not the overriding concern. Of greater importance is the necessity to maximize individual interests or rewards of any particular decision. When unanimity is unattainable, the group turns to majority rule for resolving disputes, each member voting according to partisan or self-interest. (Mann, Radford, & Kanagawa, 1985, p. 1557) Regardless of cultural backgrounds, "goals and objectives are created by each person according to that person's value system" (Cherrington, 1989, p. 609) when making decisions, and the values of a certain culture motivate its members to behave cooperatively or competitively (Boyd & Richerson, 1991). …

[1]  R. Rohner,et al.  Perceived parental acceptance-rejection and parental control among Korean adolescents. , 1985, Child development.

[2]  R. Brislin,et al.  Cross-cultural training across the individualism-collectivism divide , 1988 .

[3]  Michael Harris Bond,et al.  The social psychology of Chinese people. , 1986 .

[4]  N. J. Olsen Social Class and Rural-Urban Patterning of Socialization in Taiwan , 1975, The Journal of Asian Studies.

[5]  M. Bond,et al.  3 – China: Aggressive Behavior and the Problem of Maintaining Order and Harmony , 1983 .

[6]  Leon Mann,et al.  Cross-cultural differences in children's use of decision rules: A comparison between Japan and Australia. , 1985 .

[7]  M. Bond,et al.  Hofstede's Culture Dimensions , 1984 .

[8]  V. Brandt Korean Village: Between Farm and Sea , 1971 .

[9]  Stella Ting-Toomey,et al.  CULTURE, FACE MAINTENANCE, AND STYLES OF HANDLING INTERPERSONAL CONFLICT: A STUDY IN FIVE CULTURES , 1991 .

[10]  Caroline Hodges Persell,et al.  Understanding society: An introduction to sociology , 1984 .

[11]  김종식 동아시아 문화와 경영, Geert Hofstede, Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values (Beverly Hills, CA:Sage Publications, 1980) ; and Cultures and Organizations : Software of the Mind (New York:McGraw-Hill, 1997) , 1999 .

[12]  William B. Gudykunst,et al.  Communicating With Strangers: An Approach to Intercultural Communication , 1984 .

[13]  Chikio Hayashi,et al.  Changes in belief systems, quality of life issues and social conditions over 25 years in post-war Japan , 1984 .

[14]  H. Triandis The Self and Social Behavior in Differing Cultural Contexts , 1989 .

[15]  J. Hendry Understanding Japanese Society , 2019 .

[16]  R. Munroe,et al.  Cross-Cultural Human Development , 1977 .

[17]  Pierre R. Dasen,et al.  Cross-Cultural Psychology: Research and Applications , 1992 .

[18]  William B. Gudykunst,et al.  The Influence of Individualism Collectivism, Self-Monitoring, and Predicted-Outcome Value on Communication in Ingroup and Outgroup Relationships , 1992 .

[19]  Charles Pavitt,et al.  Small Group Discussion: A Theoretical Approach , 1990 .

[20]  M. Argyle Cooperation, the basis of sociability , 1991 .

[21]  Huda Ayyash-Abdo,et al.  Individualism and collectivism: The case of Lebanon , 2001 .

[22]  L. Mann Cross‐cultural studies of rules for determining majority and minority decision rights , 1986 .

[23]  H. Triandis The Psychological Measurement of Cultural Syndromes. , 1996 .

[24]  E. Sampson Psychology and the American ideal. , 1977 .

[25]  S. Ekblad Relationships between child‐rearing practices and primary school children's functional adjustment in the People's Republic of China , 1986 .

[26]  H. Triandis,et al.  Individualism and Collectivism: Cross-cultural Perspectives on Self-ingroup Relationships We Wish to Thank Our Research Collaborators for Stimulating Ideas, Data, and Moral Support in Carrying out a Complex Set of Studies. They , 2022 .

[27]  Francis L. K. Hsu,et al.  Psychosocial Homeostasis and Jen: Conceptual Tools for Advancing Psychological Anthropology , 1971 .

[28]  D. Wu Child Training in Chinese Culture , 1985 .

[29]  J. Neuliep Intercultural Communication: A Contextual Approach , 2002 .

[30]  Peter B. Smith,et al.  Individualism: Collectivism and the handling of disagreement. A 23 country study , 1998 .

[31]  G. Hofstede Motivation, leadership, and organization: Do American theories apply abroad? , 1980 .

[32]  Eduardo Salas,et al.  Group Cohesiveness and Quality of Decision Making , 1994 .

[33]  S. Breiner Early child development in China , 1980, Child psychiatry and human development.

[34]  Kim Giffin,et al.  Decision-making group interaction , 1978 .

[35]  Frank R. Abate,et al.  The new Oxford American dictionary , 2001 .

[36]  D. Cherrington,et al.  Organizational behavior: The management of individual and organizational performance , 1989 .