‘Fortis/lenis' revisited one more time: the aerodynamics of some oral stop contrasts in three continents

The terms fortis and lenis are variously regarded as having one single underlying phonetic correlate or many. An exploratory analysis of acoustic and aerodynamic data on contrasting stop series in a number of European and non‐European languages confirms that a significant variation in peak intra‐oral pressure and in articulatory stricture duration are two of the main factors differentiating these series. Two central questions are: (1) Is the contrast in peak pressure controlled by lung volume decrement or by the degree of glottal aperture? (2) Is the gesture for the lenis sound a truncated or a re‐scaled version of the gesture for the fortis sound? A more detailed examination of the data from the non‐European languages suggests that glottal aperture, rather than respiratory effort is the main physiological parameter underlying the pressure variation, and that each member of the opposition has a specific target peak pressure, rather than the lenis peak pressure being truncated by the early release of the articulatory closure.

[1]  Taehong Cho,et al.  Acoustic and aerodynamic correlates of Korean stops and fricatives , 2002, J. Phonetics.

[2]  C Henton,et al.  Stops in the World’s Languages , 1992, Phonetica.

[3]  P. Keating Phonological structure and phonetic form , 1995 .

[4]  A. Malécot,et al.  The lenis-fortis opposition: its physiological parameters. , 1970, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  A. Malécot,et al.  The Effect of Syllabic Rate and Loudness on the Force of Articulation of American Stops and Fricatives , 1969 .

[6]  W. Hardcastle Some observations on the Tense-Lax Distinction in Initial Stops in Korean , 1973 .

[7]  A. Malécot Mechanical Pressure as an Index of ‘Force of Articulation’ , 1966 .

[8]  L. Lisker,et al.  Supraglottal Air Pressure in the Production of English Stops , 1970, Language and speech.

[9]  K. Kohler Phonetic Explanation in Phonology: The Feature Fortis/Lenis , 1984, Phonetica.

[10]  A. Malécot,et al.  The Effectiveness of Intra-Oral Air-Pressure-Pulse Parameters in Distinguishing Between Stop Cognates , 1966 .

[11]  S. Dart An aerodynamic study of Korean stop consonants: measurements and modeling. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  P. Ladefoged Preliminaries to linguistic phonetics , 1967 .

[13]  Beckman,et al.  Phonological Structure and Phonetic Form: Articulatory evidence for differentiating stress categories , 1994 .

[14]  J. Jaeger,et al.  The fortis/lenis question: evidence from Zapotec and Jawo , 1983 .

[15]  P. Foulkes The Sounds of the World's Languages , 1997 .

[16]  AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF FORCE OF ARTICULATION , 1955 .

[17]  A. Malécot,et al.  The Force of Articulation of American Stops and Fricatives as a Function of Position , 1968 .

[18]  J. Harrington,et al.  Coarticulation and the accented/unaccented distinction: evidence from jaw movement data , 1995 .

[19]  L. Lisker,et al.  A Cross-Language Study of Voicing in Initial Stops: Acoustical Measurements , 1964 .