Measurement of electroosmotic flow in plastic imprinted microfluid devices and the effect of protein adsorption on flow rate.

Several commercially available plastic materials were used as substrates in the fabrication of microfluid channels for biochemical analysis. Protocols for fabrication using the wire-imprinting method are reported for polystyrene, polymethylmethacrylate and a copolyester material. Channel sealing was accomplished by low-temperature bonding of a substrate of similar material; therefore, each channel was composed of a single material on all sides. The electroosmotic flow in 25-microm imprinted channels was evaluated for each substrate material. The copolyester material exhibited the highest electroosmotic flow mobility of 4.3 x 10(-4) cm2 V(-1) s(-1) which is similar to that previously reported for fused-silica capillaries. Polystyrene exhibited the lowest electroosmotic flow mobility of 1.8 x 10(-4) cm2 V(-1) s(-1). Plots of linear velocity versus applied electric field strength were linear from 100 V cm(-1) to 500 V cm(-1) indicating that heat dissipation is effective for all substrates in this range. Electroosmotic flow was reevaluated in the plastic channels following incubation in antibody solution to access the non-specific binding characteristics of a common biochemical reagent onto the substrate materials. All materials tested showed a high degree of non-specific adsorption of IgG as indicated by a decrease in the electroosmotic flow mobility in post-incubation testing.

[1]  E. Kenndler,et al.  Electrophoresis in synthetic organic polymer capillaries: variation of electroosmotic velocity and .zeta. potential with pH and solvent composition , 1992 .

[2]  R S Foote,et al.  Microchip device for cell lysis, multiplex PCR amplification, and electrophoretic sizing. , 1998, Analytical chemistry.

[3]  S. Shoji.  Micro Total Analysis Systems , 1999 .

[4]  R. Zare,et al.  Current-monitoring method for measuring the electroosmotic flow rate in capillary zone electrophoresis , 1988 .

[5]  Brian N. Johnson,et al.  An integrated nanoliter DNA analysis device. , 1998, Science.

[6]  R. McCormick,et al.  Microchannel electrophoretic separations of DNA in injection-molded plastic substrates. , 1997, Analytical chemistry.

[7]  D. J. Harrison,et al.  Clinical potential of microchip capillary electrophoresis systems , 1997, Electrophoresis.

[8]  H. Engelhardt,et al.  Capillary electrophoresis in organic polymer capillaries , 1996 .

[9]  M. A. Northrup,et al.  Functional integration of PCR amplification and capillary electrophoresis in a microfabricated DNA analysis device. , 1996, Analytical chemistry.

[10]  C. Effenhauser,et al.  Integrated capillary electrophoresis on flexible silicone microdevices:  analysis of DNA restriction fragments and detection of single DNA molecules on microchips. , 1997, Analytical chemistry.

[11]  G. Whitesides,et al.  Fabrication of three‐dimensional micro‐structures: Microtransfer molding , 1996 .

[12]  J. Rossier,et al.  UV Laser Machined Polymer Substrates for the Development of Microdiagnostic Systems. , 1997, Analytical chemistry.

[13]  D. Schmalzing,et al.  Microchip electrophoretic immunoassay for serum cortisol. , 1996, Analytical chemistry.

[14]  S. Soper,et al.  Microcapillary electrophoresis devices fabricated using polymeric substrates and X‐ray lithography , 1998 .

[15]  R. G. Christensen,et al.  Fabrication of plastic microfluid channels by imprinting methods. , 1997, Analytical chemistry.

[16]  I. Mikšík,et al.  Determination of the isoelectric point of the capillary wall in capillary electrophoresis: Application to plastic capillaries , 1994 .