Community-integrated GIS for Land Reform in South Africa

This article examines the role that GIS plays in how people view, exploit, and manage their physical resource base. The research contributes to the growing Participatory GIS literature and offers insight gained from the implementation of a Community-integrated GIS in South Africa. The Central Lowveld CiGIS explored landscape politics and struggles through the inclusion of socially differentiated community spatial stories and cognitive maps in a GIS to produce representations of local and regional political ecologies. Non-hegemonic ways of knowing and exploiting nature and environment were incorporated into the multimedia GIS. The paper provides conceptual and methodological guidance for integrating local community knowledge with geo-spatial technologies. The connection, however, to local policy making proved difficult to sustain because of dramatic policy and personnel changes within national and regional implementation agencies in the transition to post-apartheid government. conventional planning projects that peripherally involve targeted beneficiaries. This is the case in contemporary South Africa, where a neo-liberal macroeconomic framework, combined with a long history of top-down and highly bureaucratic decision making, has created a planning environment that remains situated within a modernization framework. The transition to democracy in South Africa has been supported by the rapid diffusion of Geographic Information System (GIS) applications (Cinderby 1995). In South Africa, as elsewhere, GIS is frequently used for digital map production and, in some cases, stands accused of transforming bad data into impressive-looking maps. Significantly, many thriving GIS consulting agencies linked to segments of the former Apartheid State were privatized before the transition of power in 1994. As a result, the GIS industry is booming in the transition from apartheid to development, and the types of GIS applications emerging tend to reinforce traditional planning applications.2 The reinvention of modernization theory and practice in South Africa is taking place in the context of a discursive shift toward participatory forms of social change. This need not be a contradiction, as participation in practice often acts to legitimize top-down projects. But South Africa has a long history of civil society struggle and activism. As a result, it is likely that some participatory initiatives that are popular and effective will emerge and it will be interesting to see if practices of community participation in South Africa can be successfully linked with GIS applications. Macdevette et al. (1999:923) argued for such an integration: “Further investment is needed in the research and development of GIS based tools as well as information required for community participatory planning.... Community level systems can be built, with expert help, to empower people and enable officials to run truly participatory development planning processes.” This article presents research results from a recently completed GIS and Society project located in the Central Lowveld of South Africa’s Mpumalanga Province (Figure 1). The project was

[1]  E. Sheppard,et al.  MODELS FOR MAKING GIS AVAILABLE TO COMMUNITY ORGANIZATIONS: DIMENSIONS OF DIFFERENCE AND APPROPRIATENESS , 2002 .

[2]  E Talen,et al.  Constructing Neighborhoods from the Bottom up: The Case for Resident-Generated GIS , 1999 .

[3]  P. Stern,et al.  People and pixels : linking remote sensing and social science , 1999 .

[4]  M. Curry Digital Places: Living with Geographic Information Technologies , 1998 .

[5]  Francis Harvey,et al.  Boundary Objects and the Social Construction of GIS Technology , 1998 .

[6]  Christine E. Dunn,et al.  GIS for development: a contradiction in terms? , 1997 .

[7]  Claire Beesley,et al.  Ground truth: The social implications of geographic information systems , 1996 .

[8]  Daniel Weiner,et al.  Resettlement Planning in Zimbabwe and South Africa's Rural Land Reform Discourse , 1996 .

[9]  Michael R. Curry,et al.  Image, practice and the hidden impacts of geographic information systems , 1994 .

[10]  J. E. Dobson The Geographic Revolution: A Retrospective on the Age of Automated Geography , 1993 .

[11]  Eric Sheppard,et al.  Automated Geography: What Kind of Geography for What Kind of Society? , 1993 .

[12]  Charles F. Hutchinson,et al.  Guidelines for Demonstrating Geographical Information Systems Based on Participatory Development , 1993, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[13]  R. Lake Planning and applied geography: positivism, ethics, and geographic information systems , 1993 .

[14]  N. Smith History and philosophy of geography: real wars, theory wars , 1992 .

[15]  Stan Openshaw,et al.  A View on the GIS Crisis in Geography, or, Using GIS to Put Humpty-Dumpty Back Together Again , 1991 .

[16]  Daniel Weiner,et al.  GIS for community forestry user groups in Nepal: putting people before the technology. , 2000 .

[17]  Trevor M. Harris,et al.  Empowerment, Marginalization, and "Community-integrated" GIS , 1998 .

[18]  LIVING NEIGHBORHOOD MAPS: THE NEXT WAVE OF LOCAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT By: Cheryl Parker of the South of Market Foundation INTRODUCTION The South of Market community in San Francisco has developed a dynamic Geographic Information , 1998 .

[19]  Sarah Elwood,et al.  GIS and Community-based Planning: Exploring the Diversity of Neighborhood Perspectives and Needs , 1998 .

[20]  Trevor M. Harris,et al.  Participatory GIS: opportunity or oxymoron? , 1998 .

[21]  S. Elwood,et al.  How and Why Community Groups Use Maps and Geographic Information , 1998 .

[22]  Andy Mitchell,et al.  Zeroing in: Geographic Information Systems at Work in the Community , 1997 .

[23]  P. Woodhouse,et al.  Hydrology, soils and irrigation systems , 1997 .

[24]  Daniel Weiner,et al.  "No more tears-- " : struggles for land in Mpumalanga, South Africa , 1997 .

[25]  Trevor M. Harris,et al.  GIS and Society: The Social Implications of How People, Space, and Environment Are Represented in GIS- Scientific Report for the Initiative 19 Specialist Meeting (96-7) , 1996 .

[26]  Robert A. Rundstrom GIS, Indigenous Peoples, and Epistemological Diversity , 1995 .

[27]  E. Sheppard GIS and Society: Towards a Research Agenda , 1995 .

[28]  Jon Goss,et al.  MARKETING THE NEW MARKETING: THE STRATEGIC DISCOURSE OF GEODEMOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS. , 1995 .

[29]  Timothy A. Warner,et al.  Apartheid Representations in a Digital Landscape: GIS, Remote Sensing and Local Knowledge in Kiepersol, South Africa , 1995 .

[30]  Ron Johnston,et al.  GIS and Geography , 1995 .

[31]  S. Moyo The land question in Zimbabwe , 1995 .

[32]  Jeremy W. Crampton,et al.  The Ethics of GIS , 1995 .

[33]  R. Gonzalez,et al.  KBS, GIS and documenting indigenous knowledge. , 1995 .

[34]  S. Aitken,et al.  Who Contrives the “Real” in GIS? Geographic Information, Planning and Critical Theory , 1995 .

[35]  J. Pickles Ground truth : the social implications of geographic information systems , 1995 .

[36]  Daniel Weiner,et al.  RURAL AND REGIONAL RESTRUCTURING OF APARTHEID: IDEOLOGY, DEVELOPMENT POLICY AND THE COMPETITION FOR SPACE , 1991 .

[37]  P. Taylor A distorted world of knowledge , 1991 .

[38]  Paul N. Okaru Power for development , 1989 .

[39]  Nicholas R. Chrisman,et al.  Design of geographic information systems based on social and cultural , 1987 .