The Effect of a Computerized Simulation on Middle School Students’ Understanding of the Kinetic Molecular Theory

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of a dynamic software simulation on the understanding of the kinetic molecular theory by 7th graders. Students in the control group (n = 62) studied a curricular unit that addressed the differences in arrangement and motion of molecules in the three phases of matter. The experimental group (n = 71) studied the same unit combined with a few computer lessons using a software simulation. The results indicate that the students in the experimental group scored significantly higher than those in the control group. Nonetheless, while both groups of students improved their understanding of the kinetic molecular theory, the overall achievements were very low. These findings suggest that the simulation improved the understanding of the 7th graders; however, it was insufficient in itself to promote meaningful learning. Statistically significant gender differences were not observed. This paper concludes with a discussion of the educational implications of this study.

[1]  Tae-Hee Noh,et al.  Instructional influence of a molecular‐level pictorial presentation of matter on students' conceptions and problem‐solving ability , 1997 .

[2]  John J. Clement,et al.  Model based learning as a key research area for science education , 2000 .

[3]  David F. Treagust,et al.  Secondary students' mental models of atoms and molecules: Implications for teaching chemistry , 1996 .

[4]  L. West,et al.  Cognitive Structure and Conceptual Change , 1985 .

[5]  Jo Ellen Roseman,et al.  How well do middle school science programs measure up? Findings from Project 2061's curriculum review , 2002 .

[6]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. , 1999 .

[7]  Philip Johnson,et al.  Children's understanding of changes of state involving the gas state, Part 2: Evaporation and condensation below boiling point , 1998 .

[8]  Bat-Sheva Eylon,et al.  A Longitudinal Study of Junior High School Students' Perceptions of the Particulate Nature of Matter. , 2001 .

[9]  Yehudit Judy Dori,et al.  A Web-Based Chemistry Course as a Means To Foster Freshmen Learning , 2003 .

[10]  Rand J. Spiro,et al.  Multiple analogies for complex concepts: antidotes for analogy-induced misconception in advanced knowledge acquisition , 1988 .

[11]  David F. Treagust,et al.  Students' understanding of the role of scientific models in learning science , 2002 .

[12]  Carol L. Smith,et al.  Understanding models and their use in science: Conceptions of middle and high school students and experts , 1991 .

[13]  P. Thagard,et al.  Analogy, Explanation, and Education. , 1992 .

[14]  Allan G. Harrison,et al.  Learning about atoms, molecules, and chemical bonds: A case study of multiple-model use in grade 11 chemistry , 2000 .

[15]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  Promoting understanding of chemical representations: Students' use of a visualization tool in the classroom , 2001 .

[16]  Audrey B. Champagne,et al.  Instructional Consequences of Students' Knowledge about Physical Phenomena. , 1986 .

[17]  R. Driver,et al.  Children's Ideas in Science , 1985 .

[18]  John W. Belcher,et al.  How Much Have They Retained? Making Unseen Concepts Seen in a Freshman Electromagnetism Course at MIT , 2007 .

[19]  R. Driver,et al.  Making Sense of Secondary Science: Research into children’s ideas , 1993 .

[20]  R. Stavy.  Children's conception of changes in the state of matter: From liquid (or solid) to gas , 1990 .

[21]  Roger Osborne,et al.  Children's conceptions of the changes of state of water , 1983 .

[22]  Joseph Nussbaum,et al.  Junior high school pupils' understanding of the particulate nature of matter: An interview study , 1978 .

[23]  Bat-Sheva Eylon,et al.  Is an atom of copper malleable , 1986 .

[24]  C. W. Anderson,et al.  Changing middle school students' conceptions of matter and molecules , 1990 .

[25]  Edward L. Smith,et al.  Teaching strategies associated with conceptual change learning in Science , 1993 .

[26]  Bertha Morris Parker,et al.  Matter and molecules , 1947 .

[27]  Yehudit Judy Dori,et al.  High-School Chemistry Students' Performance and Gender Differences in a Computerized Molecular Modeling Learning Environment , 1999 .

[28]  Rosária Justi,et al.  Modelling, teachers' views on the nature of modelling, and implications for the education of modellers , 2002 .

[29]  A. Ortony,et al.  Similarity and Analogical Reasoning , 1991 .

[30]  Luli Stern.  Reply: Analysis of students' assessments in curriculum materials: Fidelity to national standards , 2003 .

[31]  Luli Stern,et al.  Analysis of students' assessments in middle school curriculum materials: Aiming precisely at benchmarks and standards , 2002 .

[32]  R. Leighton,et al.  Feynman Lectures on Physics , 1971 .

[33]  Jo Ellen Roseman,et al.  Can Middle-School Science textbooks help students learn important ideas? Findings from project 2061's curriculum evaluation study: Life Science , 2004 .

[34]  Peter J. Fensham,et al.  The Content Of Science: A Constructive Approach To Its Teaching And Learning , 1994 .

[35]  W. Harwood,et al.  Effects of integrated video media on student achievement and attitudes in high school chemistry , 1997 .

[36]  Philip Johnson,et al.  Progression in children's understanding of a ‘basic’ particle theory: a longitudinal study , 1998 .

[37]  Yehudit Judy Dori,et al.  COMPUTERIZED MOLECULAR MODELING - THE NEW TECHNOLOGY FOR ENHANCING MODEL PERCEPTION AMONG CHEMISTRY EDUCATORS AND LEARNERS , 2000 .

[38]  John K. Gilbert,et al.  Models in explanations, Part 1 : Horses for courses? , 1998 .

[39]  Yehudit Judy Dori,et al.  How Does Technology-Enabled Active Learning Affect Undergraduate Students' Understanding of Electromagnetism Concepts? , 2005 .