The alteration of a mechanical property of bone cells during the process of changing from osteoblasts to osteocytes.

[1]  H. Ris,et al.  Osteocyte Shape Is Dependent on Actin Filaments and Osteocyte Processes Are Unique Actin‐Rich Projections , 1998, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[2]  Y. Mikuni‐Takagaki,et al.  Distinct responses of different populations of bone cells to mechanical stress. , 1996, Endocrinology.

[3]  D. Ingber Tensegrity I. Cell structure and hierarchical systems biology , 2003, Journal of Cell Science.

[4]  C. Palumbo A three-dimensional ultrastructural study of osteoid-osteocytes in the tibia of chick embryos , 2004, Cell and Tissue Research.

[5]  Kenneth M. Yamada,et al.  Molecular interactions in cell adhesion complexes. , 1997, Current opinion in cell biology.

[6]  S Lees,et al.  Measuring the microelastic properties of biological material. , 1992, Biophysical journal.

[7]  D. Ingber,et al.  Cellular tensegrity : defining new rules of biological design that govern the cytoskeleton , 2022 .

[8]  P. Davies,et al.  Flow-mediated endothelial mechanotransduction. , 1995, Physiological reviews.

[9]  K. Burridge,et al.  Focal adhesions, contractility, and signaling. , 1996, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[10]  P K Hansma,et al.  Measuring the viscoelastic properties of human platelets with the atomic force microscope. , 1996, Biophysical journal.

[11]  H. Ris,et al.  Primary Cultures of Chick Osteocytes Retain Functional Gap Junctions between Osteocytes and between Osteocytes and Osteoblasts , 2007, Microscopy and Microanalysis.

[12]  B. Hall,et al.  Buried alive: How osteoblasts become osteocytes , 2006, Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists.

[13]  Teruko Takano-Yamamoto,et al.  Terminal Differentiation of Osteoblasts to Osteocytes Is Accompanied by Dramatic Changes in the Distribution of Actin‐Binding Proteins , 2004, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[14]  Yasuo Ogasawara,et al.  Measurements of endothelial cell-to-cell and cell-to-substrate gaps and micromechanical properties of endothelial cells during monocyte adhesion , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  T. Mitchison Evolution of a dynamic cytoskeleton. , 1995, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[16]  H. Haga,et al.  Elasticity mapping of living fibroblasts by AFM and immunofluorescence observation of the cytoskeleton. , 2000, Ultramicroscopy.

[17]  D. Zaffe,et al.  Osteocyte differentiation in the tibia of newborn rabbit: an ultrastructural study of the formation of cytoplasmic processes. , 1990, Acta anatomica.

[18]  Sandor Kasas,et al.  Deformation and height anomaly of soft surfaces studied with an AFM , 1993 .

[19]  P. Davies,et al.  Quantitative studies of endothelial cell adhesion. Directional remodeling of focal adhesion sites in response to flow forces. , 1994, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[20]  D E Ingber,et al.  Cell shape, cytoskeletal mechanics, and cell cycle control in angiogenesis. , 1995, Journal of biomechanics.

[21]  Yoshihito Ishihara,et al.  Hormonal, pH, and Calcium Regulation of Connexin 43–Mediated Dye Transfer in Osteocytes in Chick Calvaria , 2007, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[22]  R Langer,et al.  Switching from differentiation to growth in hepatocytes: Control by extracellular matrix , 1992, Journal of cellular physiology.

[23]  Daniel I. C. Wang,et al.  Engineering cell shape and function. , 1994, Science.

[24]  T. Takano-Yamamoto,et al.  Fluid Shear Stress Induces Less Calcium Response in a Single Primary Osteocyte Than in a Single Osteoblast: Implication of Different Focal Adhesion Formation , 2006, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[25]  D. Ingber,et al.  Mechanotransduction across the cell surface and through the cytoskeleton , 1993 .

[26]  D. Ingber Tensegrity: the architectural basis of cellular mechanotransduction. , 1997, Annual review of physiology.

[27]  P. Nijweide,et al.  Biochemical and histological studies on various bone cell preparations , 2006, Calcified Tissue International.

[28]  D E Ingber,et al.  Cellular tensegrity: exploring how mechanical changes in the cytoskeleton regulate cell growth, migration, and tissue pattern during morphogenesis. , 1994, International review of cytology.

[29]  W. H. Goldmann,et al.  Differences in F9 and 5.51 cell elasticity determined by cell poking and atomic force microscopy , 1998, FEBS letters.

[30]  T. Takano-Yamamoto,et al.  A three-dimensional distribution of osteocyte processes revealed by the combination of confocal laser scanning microscopy and differential interference contrast microscopy. , 2001, Bone.

[31]  M J Bissell,et al.  Influence of a reconstituted basement membrane and its components on casein gene expression and secretion in mouse mammary epithelial cells. , 1987, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  Teruko Takano-Yamamoto,et al.  Three-dimensional reconstruction of chick calvarial osteocytes and their cell processes using confocal microscopy. , 2005, Bone.

[33]  G. Marotti,et al.  Morphological study of intercellular junctions during osteocyte differentiation. , 1990, Bone.

[34]  P. Nijweide,et al.  Identification of osteocytes in osteoblast-like cell cultures using a monoclonal antibody specifically directed against osteocytes , 2004, Histochemistry.