Measurement method for volumetric error of five-axis machine tool considering measurement point distribution and adaptive identification process

Abstract To improve the machine tool accuracy, geometric error identification is required for volumetric error compensation. This paper presents a method for the geometric error identification of a five-axis machine tool that considers the optimised distribution of measurement points and accurate description of geometric errors. The measurement is performed using a laser tracker that permits rapid error data collection over a large measurement range. In the volumetric error modelling, the geometric errors are described as position-dependent Chebyshev polynomials. Hence, the identification of geometric errors is converted into the identification of polynomial coefficients. In the identification process, a distribution method for measurement points is proposed to improve the identification accuracy by minimising the influence of measurement error on the identification result. At the same time, an adaptive approach is introduced to accurately define the polynomial orders of geometric errors to improve the identification accuracy. Simulations and experiments are conducted to verify the geometric error identification method. In addition, the proposed method is compared with other methods. Based on the identification result of geometric errors and the volumetric error model, the volumetric error of any position in a workspace can be predicted and further compensated.

[1]  Yuan Kang,et al.  An efficient error compensation system for CNC multi-axis machines , 2002 .

[2]  Nuodi Huang,et al.  Dynamic accuracy evaluation for five-axis machine tools using S trajectory deviation based on R-test measurement , 2018 .

[3]  Xin-Jun Liu,et al.  A geometric error identification method for the swiveling axes of five-axis machine tools by static R-test , 2017 .

[4]  Nuodi Huang,et al.  Identification of geometric errors of rotary axes on 5-axis machine tools by on-machine measurement , 2016 .

[5]  Giovanni Moroni,et al.  Adaptive inspection in coordinate metrology based on kriging models , 2013 .

[6]  Majda Paweł,et al.  Rapid method to determine accuracy and repeatability of positioning of numerically controlled axes , 2019 .

[7]  Giovanni Moroni,et al.  A tolerance interval based criterion for optimizing discrete point sampling strategies , 2010 .

[8]  S. Weikert,et al.  R-Test, a New Device for Accuracy Measurements on Five Axis Machine Tools , 2004 .

[9]  Robert G. Landers,et al.  Table-Based Volumetric Error Compensation of Large Five-Axis Machine Tools , 2017 .

[10]  John M. Hollerbach,et al.  The noise amplification index for optimal pose selection in robot calibration , 1996, Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[11]  Andrew P. Longstaff,et al.  Impact of measurement procedure when error mapping and compensating a small CNC machine using a multilateration laser interferometer , 2014 .

[12]  Vincent Hayward,et al.  Calibration of a parallel robot using multiple kinematic closed loops , 1994, Proceedings of the 1994 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[13]  Soichi Ibaraki,et al.  A machining test to calibrate rotary axis error motions of five-axis machine tools and its application to thermal deformation test , 2014 .

[14]  Soichi Ibaraki,et al.  Estimation of three-dimensional volumetric errors of machining centers by a tracking interferometer , 2015 .

[15]  Sofiane Achiche,et al.  Five-axis machine tools accuracy condition monitoring based on volumetric errors and vector similarity measures , 2019, International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture.

[16]  Jorge Santolaria,et al.  Identification strategy of error parameter in volumetric error compensation of machine tool based on laser tracker measurements , 2012 .

[17]  Sonko Osawa,et al.  Geometric calibration of a coordinate measuring machine using a laser tracking system , 2005 .

[18]  Jie Li,et al.  Geometric error identification and compensation of linear axes based on a novel 13-line method , 2016 .

[19]  Wang Sujuan,et al.  Identification of geometric errors of rotary axis on multi-axis machine tool based on kinematic analysis method using double ball bar , 2017 .

[20]  Andrew P. Longstaff,et al.  Improved Machine Tool Linear Axis Calibration Through Continuous Motion Data Capture , 2017 .

[21]  Jun Zha,et al.  Influence of geometric errors of guide rails and table on motion errors of hydrostatic guideways under quasi-static condition , 2018 .

[22]  Chia-Hsiang Menq,et al.  Determination of Optimal Measurement Configurations for Robot Calibration Based on Observability Measure , 1991, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[23]  Dan Zhao,et al.  An efficient error compensation method for coordinated CNC five-axis machine tools , 2017 .

[24]  Jorge Santolaria,et al.  Towards an effective identification strategy in volumetric error compensation of machine tools , 2012 .

[25]  Robert Schmitt,et al.  On-the-fly calibration of linear and rotary axes of machine tools and CMMs using a tracking interferometer , 2009 .

[26]  Tony C. Woo,et al.  Dimensional measurement of surfaces and their sampling , 1993, Comput. Aided Des..

[27]  Soichi Ibaraki,et al.  Indirect Measurement of Volumetric Accuracy for Three-Axis and Five-Axis Machine Tools: A Review , 2012 .

[28]  Jorge Santolaria,et al.  Protocol for machine tool volumetric verification using commercial laser tracker , 2014 .

[29]  Robert Schmitt,et al.  Geometric error measurement and compensation of machines : an update , 2008 .

[30]  S. Sartori,et al.  Geometric Error Measurement and Compensation of Machines , 1995 .

[31]  Yusuf Altintas,et al.  Modeling and compensation of volumetric errors for five-axis machine tools , 2016 .

[32]  Morris Driels,et al.  Significance of observation strategy on the design of robot calibration experiments , 1990, J. Field Robotics.

[33]  Soichi Ibaraki,et al.  Influence of position-dependent geometric errors of rotary axes on a machining test of cone frustum by five-axis machine tools , 2011 .

[34]  Yu Sun,et al.  Observability index selection for robot calibration , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[35]  Shivakumar Raman,et al.  Intelligent Search-Based Selection of Sample Points for Straightness and Flatness Estimation , 2003 .