Physical characterization of particulate matter emitted from wood combustion in improved and traditional cookstoves

Abstract Experiments were conducted to investigate the particle characteristics emitted from 10 wood types combusted in a traditional and an improved cookstove. The performance of the cookstoves has been assessed on the basis of their thermal efficiency using water boiling test (WBT). An aerosol spectrometer (GRIMM 1.108) was used for particulate matter sampling which provides real time data of size resolved particle concentrations. Variation in particle size distribution during different combustion phases was also analyzed. Particle size distribution (PSD) with respect to number, surface area and volume was studied to find out most dominant PM size range along with PM emission factors (EFs). Improved, top feed, cookstove was found to perform better than the traditional cookstove, both in terms of thermal efficiency and emissions. Around 99% of the particles were found in the fine range of 0.3–1 μm for both the cookstoves. Count median diameter (CMD) for improved cookstove was found to be 1.47 (with 3.76 as Geometric standard deviation (GSD)) as compared to 1.55 (with 3.73 as GSD) for the traditional cookstove, indicating a shift towards fine range particles. The total particle-number emission factor (TPNEF) and mass emission factor (MEF) for ten wood types were higher in traditional cookstove with an average value of 2.7 × 10 13  kg − 1 and 6.17 g kg − 1 respectively. In case of improved cookstove TPNEF and MEF were found to be 7.6 × 10 12  kg − 1 and 0.72 g kg − 1 respectively indicating significant decrease in PM emissions. The size range of particles was also validated with scanning electron microscopy (SEM) by calculating actual size of the primary particles emitted from the combustion of a particular wood type. The findings of this study highlight the effect of cookstove design on resultant particle emissions and their distribution in various size ranges.

[1]  H. H. Jawurek,et al.  Comparison of five rural, wood-burning cooking devices: efficiencies and emissions. , 1996 .

[2]  Jianmin Chen,et al.  Particle size distribution and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons emissions from agricultural crop residue burning. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[3]  C. Venkataraman,et al.  Emission factors of carbon monoxide and size-resolved aerosols from biofuel combustion. , 2001, Environmental science & technology.

[4]  Subhrendu K. Pattanayak,et al.  Who Adopts Improved Fuels and Cookstoves? A Systematic Review , 2012, Environmental health perspectives.

[5]  V. Sreekanth,et al.  Measurements of aerosol intensive properties over Visakhapatnam, India for 2007 , 2011 .

[6]  Ken R. Smith,et al.  Performance testing for monitoring improved biomass stove interventions: experiences of the Household Energy and Health Project , 2007 .

[7]  B. DeAngelo,et al.  Bounding the role of black carbon in the climate system: A scientific assessment , 2013 .

[8]  Jarkko Tissari,et al.  The effects of operating conditions on emissions from masonry heaters and sauna stoves , 2009 .

[9]  Alan D. Lopez,et al.  A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010 , 2012, The Lancet.

[10]  Ken R. Smith,et al.  Monitoring and evaluation of improved biomass cookstove programs for indoor air quality and stove performance: conclusions from the Household Energy and Health Project , 2007 .

[11]  Thomas W. Kirchstetter,et al.  Size-resolved particle number and volume emission factors for on-road gasoline and diesel motor vehicles , 2010 .

[12]  H. Wiinikka High temperature aerosol formation and emission minimisation during combustion of wood pellets , 2005 .

[13]  M. Andreae,et al.  Comparison of three methods of fractal analysis applied to soot aggregates from wood combustion. , 2006 .

[14]  J S Lighty,et al.  Combustion Aerosols: Factors Governing Their Size and Composition and Implications to Human Health , 2000, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[15]  H. H. Jawurek,et al.  The “hood method” of measuring emissions of rural cooking devices , 1999 .

[16]  Rufus Edwards,et al.  Indoor particle size distributions in homes with open fires and improved Patsari cook stoves , 2010 .

[17]  Lidia Morawska,et al.  Fundamentals of Indoor Particles and Settled Dust , 2006 .

[18]  Lidia Morawska,et al.  The modality of particle size distributions of environmental aerosols , 1999 .

[19]  Hadi Dowlatabadi,et al.  A black-carbon mitigation wedge , 2009 .

[20]  Kihong Park,et al.  Volatility and mixing states of ultrafine particles from biomass burning. , 2012, Journal of hazardous materials.

[21]  J. B. Kandpal,et al.  Combustion of biomass fuels in two cookstoves for their conservation , 1995 .

[22]  Milind Kandlikar,et al.  Characterization of ultrafine particulate matter from traditional and improved biomass cookstoves. , 2013, Environmental science & technology.

[23]  Darrin K. Ott,et al.  Comparison of the Grimm 1.108 and 1.109 portable aerosol spectrometer to the TSI 3321 aerodynamic particle sizer for dry particles. , 2006, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[24]  Ian M. Kennedy,et al.  The health effects of combustion-generated aerosols , 2007 .

[25]  Tami C. Bond,et al.  A laboratory comparison of the global warming impact of five major types of biomass cooking stoves , 2008 .

[26]  Barouch Giechaskiel,et al.  Size-distribution dependent lung deposition of diesel exhaust particles , 2009 .

[27]  Tami C. Bond,et al.  Laboratory and field investigations of particulate and carbon monoxide emissions from traditional and improved cookstoves , 2009 .

[28]  M. L. Laucks,et al.  Aerosol Technology Properties, Behavior, and Measurement of Airborne Particles , 2000 .