Assessing glucose monitor performance--a standardized approach.

BACKGROUND Glucose monitor evaluations must be carefully designed and executed in order to control protocol-specific bias and random patient interferences. Although published guidelines and recommendations exist, investigators rarely incorporate consensus standards or quality guidelines into glucose monitor evaluation studies. METHODS We performed a literature search for "best practice" quality guidelines for conducting and reporting glucose monitor evaluation studies. These guidelines included: Standards for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy (STARD); Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) C30-A2 and EP9-A2; U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA); International Federation of Clinical Chemistry (IFCC); Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research (TNO); U.K. Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA); Scandinavian evaluation of laboratory equipment for primary health care (SKUP); National Standard of the People's Republic of China (China GB/T 19634); and International Standards Organization (ISO 15197). RESULTS We constructed a checklist that outlines a standardized approach to glucose monitor evaluations, along with associated references applicable to international standards and consensus recommendations. We expect that the checklist could be used as the basis for a protocol that is (1) evidence-based, (2) scientifically defensible, and (3) sufficiently descriptive to allow for test and result reproducibility. CONCLUSIONS We propose a standardized 14-step checklist that facilitates the incorporation of international consensus standards, quality guidelines, and acceptance criteria into the design and reporting of glucose monitor evaluation protocols.

[1]  K. Kanarek,et al.  Glucose determinations in plasma and serum: potential error related to increased hematocrit. , 1982, Clinical chemistry.

[2]  Evaluation of Portable Blood Glucose Meters. Problems and Recommendations , 2003, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.

[3]  Within-person, among-finger variability of capillary blood glucose measurements. , 2004, Clinical chemistry.

[4]  J. Krouwer.  How to improve total error modeling by accounting for error sources beyond imprecision and bias. , 2001, Clinical chemistry.

[5]  Joakim Hagvik.  Comment on: Bellini C, Serra G, Risso D, Mazzella M, Bonioli E. Reliability assessment of glucose measurement by HemoCue analyser in a neonatal intensive care unit. Clin Chem Lab Med 2007;45(11):1549–54 , 2008, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.

[6]  James C. Lin,et al.  Problems and Recommendations , 1987 .

[7]  Katsuhiko Kuwa,et al.  Approved IFCC recommendation on reporting results for blood glucose (abbreviated). , 2005, Clinical chemistry.

[8]  K. Jungheim,et al.  Glucose monitoring at the arm: risky delays of hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia detection. , 2002, Diabetes care.

[9]  Gunn B B Kristensen,et al.  Standardized evaluation of nine instruments for self-monitoring of blood glucose. , 2008, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[10]  S. Sandberg,et al.  Standardized evaluation of instruments for self-monitoring of blood glucose by patients and a technologist. , 2004, Clinical chemistry.

[11]  Bruce W Bode,et al.  Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose (SMBG) in insulin- and non-insulin-using adults with diabetes: consensus recommendations for improving SMBG accuracy, utilization, and research. , 2008, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[12]  J. Winkelman,et al.  Accuracy evaluation of a new glucometer with automated hematocrit measurement and correction. , 2005, Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry.

[13]  J. Nichols.  What is accuracy and how close must the agreement be? , 2005, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[14]  J. Mahoney,et al.  Assessing the quality of glucose monitor studies: a critical evaluation of published reports. , 2007, Clinical chemistry.

[15]  J. Nichols,et al.  Assessing glucose meter accuracy , 2006, Current medical research and opinion.

[16]  Clinical Application and Challenges of Blood Glucose Measurement Technology for Self-Monitoring , 2008 .

[17]  James H Nichols,et al.  Performance evaluation of blood glucose monitoring devices. , 2003, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[18]  David Moher,et al.  Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy. , 2003, Clinical chemistry.

[19]  J. Nichols.  Analysis: Interpreting Method Evaluations , 2002 .