Label-free, microfluidic separation and enrichment of human breast cancer cells by adhesion difference.

A label-free microfluidic method for separation and enrichment of human breast cancer cells is presented using cell adhesion as a physical marker. To maximize the adhesion difference between normal epithelial and cancer cells, flat or nanostructured polymer surfaces (400 nm pillars, 400 nm perpendicular, or 400 nm parallel lines) were constructed on the bottom of polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) microfluidic channels in a parallel fashion using a UV-assisted capillary moulding technique. The adhesion of human breast epithelial cells (MCF10A) and cancer cells (MCF7) on each channel was independently measured based on detachment assays where the adherent cells were counted with increasing flow rate after a pre-culture for a period of time (e.g., one, two, and four hours). It was found that MCF10A cells showed higher adhesion than MCF7 cells regardless of culture time and surface nanotopography at all flow rates, resulting in label-free separation and enrichment of cancer cells. For the cell types used in our study, an optimum separation was found for 2 hours pre-culture on the 400 nm perpendicular line pattern followed by flow-induced detachment at a flow rate of 200 microl min(-1). The fraction of MCF7 cells was increased from 0.36 +/- 0.04 to 0.83 +/- 0.04 under these optimized conditions.

[1]  A. Lostumbo,et al.  Flow cytometry: a new approach for the molecular profiling of breast cancer. , 2006, Experimental and molecular pathology.

[2]  D P Gaver,et al.  A theoretical model study of the influence of fluid stresses on a cell adhering to a microchannel wall. , 1998, Biophysical journal.

[3]  Weihong Tan,et al.  Aptamer-conjugated nanoparticles for selective collection and detection of cancer cells. , 2006, Analytical chemistry.

[4]  K. Suh,et al.  Pumpless, selective docking of yeast cells inside a microfluidic channel induced by receding meniscus. , 2006, Lab on a chip.

[5]  Tejal A. Desai,et al.  Methods for Fabrication of Nanoscale Topography for Tissue Engineering Scaffolds , 2006, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[6]  Prahlad T. Ram,et al.  Expression of Q227L-galphas in MCF-7 human breast cancer cells inhibits tumorigenesis. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  Y. Ito,et al.  A new continuous‐flow cell separation method based on cell density: Principle, apparatus, and preliminary application to separation of human buffy coat , 2001, Journal of clinical apheresis.

[8]  Elinore M Mercer,et al.  Microfluidic sorting of mammalian cells by optical force switching , 2005, Nature Biotechnology.

[9]  G. Truskey,et al.  A numerical analysis of forces exerted by laminar flow on spreading cells in a parallel plate flow chamber assay , 1993, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[10]  C. Wilkinson,et al.  Substratum nanotopography and the adhesion of biological cells. Are symmetry or regularity of nanotopography important? , 2001, Biophysical chemistry.

[11]  Byungkyu Kim,et al.  Guided three-dimensional growth of functional cardiomyocytes on polyethylene glycol nanostructures. , 2006, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[12]  H. H. Lee,et al.  Capillary Force Lithography , 2001 .

[13]  D. Shangguan,et al.  Aptamers evolved from live cells as effective molecular probes for cancer study , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  Z. Ye,et al.  Soluble member(s) of the mesothelin/megakaryocyte potentiating factor family are detectable in sera from patients with ovarian carcinoma. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  Peter R C Gascoyne,et al.  Dielectrophoretic segregation of different human cell types on microscope slides. , 2005, Analytical chemistry.

[16]  F F Becker,et al.  Separation of human breast cancer cells from blood by differential dielectric affinity. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  M. W. Vaughn,et al.  Microfluidic-based diagnostics for cervical cancer cells. , 2006, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[18]  A. Higuchi,et al.  Cell separation of hepatocytes and fibroblasts through surface-modified polyurethane membranes. , 2004, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[19]  James Runt,et al.  Human foetal osteoblastic cell response to polymer-demixed nanotopographic interfaces , 2005, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[20]  Tim Dallas,et al.  Cell Detachment Model for an Antibody‐Based Microfluidic Cancer Screening System , 2008, Biotechnology progress.

[21]  Se-Jin Choi,et al.  An ultraviolet-curable mold for sub-100-nm lithography. , 2004, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[22]  Ali Khademhosseini,et al.  A soft lithographic approach to fabricate patterned microfluidic channels. , 2004, Analytical chemistry.

[23]  R. Lerner,et al.  Antibodies to peptides detect new hepatitis B antigen: serological correlation with hepatocellular carcinoma. , 1985, Science.

[24]  Dorian Liepmann,et al.  Biomimetic technique for adhesion-based collection and separation of cells in a microfluidic channel. , 2005, Lab on a chip.

[25]  J. Krueger,et al.  E-cadherin distribution in interleukin 6-induced cell-cell separation of ductal breast carcinoma cells. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  Mehmet Toner,et al.  Enrichment using antibody-coated microfluidic chambers in shear flow: model mixtures of human lymphocytes. , 2005, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[27]  Douglas A Lauffenburger,et al.  Microfluidic shear devices for quantitative analysis of cell adhesion. , 2004, Analytical chemistry.

[28]  Bong-Hyun Jun,et al.  Nanoparticle probes with surface enhanced Raman spectroscopic tags for cellular cancer targeting. , 2006, Analytical chemistry.

[29]  M. Heller,et al.  Dielectrophoretic cell separation and gene expression profiling on microelectronic chip arrays. , 2002, Analytical chemistry.

[30]  Milica Radisic,et al.  Peptide-mediated selective adhesion of smooth muscle and endothelial cells in microfluidic shear flow. , 2007, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[31]  D. Lauffenburger,et al.  A dynamical model for receptor-mediated cell adhesion to surfaces. , 1987, Biophysical journal.

[32]  C. Murphy,et al.  Epithelial contact guidance on well-defined micro- and nanostructured substrates , 2003, Journal of Cell Science.

[33]  C. Wilkinson,et al.  A parallel-plate flow chamber to study initial cell adhesion on a nanofeatured surface , 2004, IEEE Transactions on NanoBioscience.

[34]  P. Milani,et al.  Biocompatibility of cluster-assembled nanostructured TiO2 with primary and cancer cells. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[35]  Sami Alom Ruiz,et al.  Nanotechnology for Cell–Substrate Interactions , 2006, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[36]  R. Austin,et al.  Design of a microfabricated magnetic cell separator , 2001, Electrophoresis.