How to Monitor and Evaluate Quality in Adaptive Heritage Reuse Projects from a Well-Being Perspective: A Proposal for a Dashboard Model of Indicators to Support Promoters

Among the research discourse concerning cultural heritage in the post-COVID-19phase, a greater awareness of the social value of heritage and its repercussions on collective well-being has emerged. This attention requires overcoming the top-down approach of public policies in favour of public–private partnership tools that are more effective at capturing the multidimensional components of value generated by cultural heritage. However, it is necessary to refine the tools used to evaluate and guide actions towards a perspective capable of integrating the conservation needs of the asset with collective well-being. This contribution investigates the calls for funding and public notices on the architectural heritage in Italy in the period from 2014–2020. In this field, the Third Sector is assuming a crucial role, showing specific attention to the issue of well-being consistent with its social goals. The calls were collected and structured in a database, with a specific focus on the calls aimed at adaptive heritage reuse that were categorised and analysed. Finally, the research proposed an assessment method based on a dashboard model of indicators to evaluate the quality of reuse interventions. The selected indicators consider both the production of plus-value in terms of improving well-being, and the need to bring the interventions on the existing architecture to a procedural circularity in line with the theoretical orientations of restoration.

[1]  S. Della Torre,et al.  The Restoration of St. James’s Church in Como and the Cathedral Museum as Agents for Sustainable Urban Planning Strategies , 2022, Land.

[2]  L. Tricarico,et al.  The Impact of COVID-19 on Public/Third-Sector Collaboration in the Italian Context , 2022, Sustainability.

[3]  D. Perperidou,et al.  Transfer of Development Rights and Cultural Heritage Preservation: A Case Study at Athens Historic Triangle, Greece , 2021, Heritage.

[4]  Guido Giovando,et al.  Impact Assessment in Not-for-Profit Organizations: The Case of a Foundation for the Development of the Territory , 2021, Sustainability.

[5]  Joanna Sofaer,et al.  Heritage sites, value and wellbeing: learning from the COVID-19 pandemic in England , 2021, International Journal of Heritage Studies.

[6]  J. Seguí,et al.  The Sustainability of Intangible Heritage in the COVID-19 Era—Resilience, Reinvention, and Challenges in Spain , 2021, Sustainability.

[7]  Robert Knippschild,et al.  Urban Regeneration between Cultural Heritage Preservation and Revitalization: Experiences with a Decision Support Tool in Eastern Germany , 2021, Land.

[8]  A. Gravagnuolo,et al.  Indicators for Ex-Post Evaluation of Cultural Heritage Adaptive Reuse Impacts in the Perspective of the Circular Economy , 2021, Sustainability.

[9]  M. Vecco,et al.  The “Intrinsic Value” of Cultural Heritage as Driver for Circular Human-Centered Adaptive Reuse , 2021, Sustainability.

[10]  Lucia Della Spina,et al.  Adaptive Sustainable Reuse for Cultural Heritage: A Multiple Criteria Decision Aiding Approach Supporting Urban Development Processes , 2020, Sustainability.

[11]  Pasquale De Toro,et al.  Cultural Heritage and Sustainable Development: Impact Assessment of Two Adaptive Reuse Projects in Siracusa, Sicily , 2019, Sustainability.

[12]  M. Holdsworth Health, Wellness and Wellbeing , 2019, Interventions économiques.

[13]  Martina Pini,et al.  Environmental and social impact assessment of cultural heritage restoration and its application to the Uncastillo Fortress , 2018, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[14]  E. Chan,et al.  Transfer of development rights as an institutional innovation to address issues of property rights , 2018 .

[15]  Emiliano Composta Concessione di Beni Pubblici degli Enti Locali a Organizzazioni del Terzo Settore (Public Assets Concession Contracts between Local Authorities and Third Sector Organisations) , 2018 .

[16]  Francesca Nocca The Role of Cultural Heritage in Sustainable Development: Multidimensional Indicators as Decision-Making Tool , 2017 .

[17]  Roberto Giordano,et al.  Economic-Environmental Indicators to Support Investment Decisions: A Focus on the Buildings’ End-of-Life Stage , 2017 .

[18]  Diana Rolando,et al.  Integrating Environmental and Economic Sustainability in New Building Construction and Retrofits , 2016 .

[19]  L. Salamon,et al.  Beyond Nonprofits: Re-conceptualizing the Third Sector , 2016 .

[20]  Alfredo Franciosa La valutazione dei processi urbani per la promozione della salute: una sperimentazione al paesaggio storico dell'area metropolitana di Napoli , 2016 .

[21]  Edwin H.W. Chan,et al.  Developing a framework to appraise the critical success factors of transfer development rights (TDRs) for built heritage conservation , 2015 .

[22]  J. Onyx,et al.  Measuring social impact: lessons from India , 2013 .

[23]  Rashida Haq,et al.  Multidimensional Wellbeing: An Index of Quality of Life in a Developing Economy , 2013 .

[24]  P. Cottino,et al.  Progetti d'Impresa Sociale come Strategie di Rigenerazione Urbana: Spazi e Metodi per l’Innovazione Sociale (Projects of Social Enterprise as Strategies of Urban Regeneration: Methods and Spaces for Social Innovation) , 2012 .

[25]  K. Scott Measuring Wellbeing: Towards Sustainability? , 2012 .

[26]  I. Hodder Cultural Heritage Rights: From Ownership and Descent to Justice and Well-being , 2010 .

[27]  Ben J Smith,et al.  WHO Health Promotion Glossary: new terms. , 2006, Health promotion international.

[28]  C. Coscia,et al.  Unlocking the Social Impact of Built Heritage Projects: Evaluation as Catalyst of Value? , 2021 .

[29]  S. Greco,et al.  Models of Public Private Partnership and financial tools for the cultural heritage valorisation , 2018 .

[30]  L. Fornara,et al.  Il patrimonio culturale e paesaggistico per lo sviluppo locale , 2014 .

[31]  G. Pane Il restauro come etica , 1996 .