Reusability ontology in business processes with similarity matching

The working technology will provide information and knowledge. Information and technology can be developed in various ways, by reusing the technologies. In this study modeled the ontology of SOPs using protege. Ontology will be matched between ontology A and B to obtain similarity and reuse ontology to create a more optimal ontology. Matching is a matching process between both ontologies to get the same value from both ontologies. Jaro-Winkler distance is used to find commonality between ontology. The result of the Jaro-Winkler distance has a value of 0 and 1, in matching will be obtained value close to 0 or 1. On matching ontology obtained two tests using 40% SPARQL query. In the test it uses Jaro-Winkler distance with a value of 0.67. This research yields matching value between ontology A and ontology B which is the same so that reuse ontology can be done for better ontology

[1]  Derek H. Sleeman,et al.  Reusing JessTab rules in Protégé , 2005, Knowl. Based Syst..

[2]  Csongor Nyulas,et al.  WebProtégé: A collaborative ontology editor and knowledge acquisition tool for the Web , 2013, Semantic Web.

[3]  Mohammed Maree,et al.  Addressing semantic heterogeneity through multiple knowledge base assisted merging of domain-specific ontologies , 2015, Knowl. Based Syst..

[4]  Riyanarto Sarno,et al.  ONTOLOGY MAPPING FOR ERP BUSINESS PROCESS VARIATIONS , 2013 .

[5]  Guandong Xu,et al.  Semantic SPARQL Query in a Relational Database Based on Ontology Construction , 2015, 2015 11th International Conference on Semantics, Knowledge and Grids (SKG).

[6]  Riyanarto Sarno,et al.  Weighted Ontology and weighted tree similarity algorithm for diagnosing Diabetes Mellitus , 2013, 2013 International Conference on Computer, Control, Informatics and Its Applications (IC3INA).

[7]  Ryan R Brinkman,et al.  OntoFox: web-based support for ontology reuse , 2010, BMC Research Notes.

[8]  Hirokazu Chiba,et al.  SPANG: a SPARQL client supporting generation and reuse of queries for distributed RDF databases , 2017, BMC Bioinformatics.

[9]  Antonio Picariello,et al.  An approach to ontology integration for ontology reuse in knowledge based digital ecosystems , 2015, MEDES.

[10]  Georgios Meditskos,et al.  MetaQ: A knowledge-driven framework for context-aware activity recognition combining SPARQL and OWL 2 activity patterns , 2016, Pervasive Mob. Comput..

[11]  Jérôme Euzenat,et al.  Ontology Matching, Second Edition , 2013 .

[12]  Bayu Priyambadha,et al.  Ontology and semantic matching for diabetic food recommendations , 2013, 2013 International Conference on Information Technology and Electrical Engineering (ICITEE).

[13]  Liangli Ma,et al.  A Comparative Evaluation of String Similarity Metrics for Ontology Alignment , 2015 .

[14]  Asunción Gómez-Pérez,et al.  Methodological guidelines for reusing general ontologies , 2013, Data Knowl. Eng..

[15]  Axel-Cyrille Ngonga Ngomo,et al.  On the efficient execution of bounded Jaro-Winkler distances , 2016, Semantic Web.

[16]  Mayank Singh,et al.  Ontology Based Information Retrieval in Semantic Web: A Survey , 2013 .

[17]  Riyanarto Sarno,et al.  Ontology Alignment using combined similarity method and matching method , 2016, 2016 International Conference on Informatics and Computing (ICIC).

[18]  Fabien L. Gandon,et al.  Ontologies in Computer Science , 2010, Ontology Theory, Management and Design.

[19]  Imants Zarembo,et al.  Assessment of Name Based Algorithms for Land Administration Ontology Matching , 2015 .

[20]  Harald Kosch,et al.  Enabling access to Linked Media with SPARQL-MM , 2015, WWW.