Orphan drug development: an economically viable strategy for biopharma R&D.

Orphan drug incentives have stimulated research into diseases with significant unmet medical need. Although the targeting of orphan diseases is seen by industry as an attractive strategy, there are limited economic data available to support its use. In this paper we show that the revenue-generating potential of orphan drugs is as great as for non-orphan drugs, even though patient populations for rare diseases are significantly smaller. Moreover, we suggest that orphan drugs have greater profitability when considered in the full context of developmental drivers including government financial incentives, smaller clinical trial sizes, shorter clinical trial times and higher rates of regulatory success. The data support the targeting of rare diseases as an important component of a successful biopharma R&D strategy.

[1]  The Committee for Orphan Medicinal Products and the Eu Secretariat European regulation on orphan medicinal products: 10 years of experience and future perspectives , 2011, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[2]  Marc Dunoyer,et al.  Accelerating access to treatments for rare diseases , 2011, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[3]  Timothy R. Coté,et al.  Accelerating orphan drug development , 2010, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[4]  Peter A Merkel,et al.  Clinical research for rare disease: opportunities, challenges, and solutions. , 2009, Molecular genetics and metabolism.

[5]  Aaron S Kesselheim,et al.  Characteristics of clinical trials to support approval of orphan vs nonorphan drugs for cancer. , 2011, JAMA.

[6]  R. Kurzrock,et al.  Uncommon tumors and exceptional therapies: paradox or paradigm? , 2007, Molecular Cancer Therapeutics.

[7]  Mark R. Trusheim,et al.  Stratified medicine: strategic and economic implications of combining drugs and clinical biomarkers , 2007, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[8]  Youwen Zhou,et al.  The US Orphan Drug Act: rare disease research stimulator or commercial opportunity? , 2010, Health policy.

[9]  Robert Kneller,et al.  The importance of new companies for drug discovery: origins of a decade of new drugs , 2010, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[10]  Martin Možina,et al.  European regulation on orphan medicinal products: 10 years of experience and future perspectives. , 2011, Nature reviews. Drug discovery.

[11]  E. Tambuyzer,et al.  Rare diseases, orphan drugs and their regulation: questions and misconceptions , 2010, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[12]  M. Braun,et al.  Orphan products: an emerging trend in drug approvals , 2010, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[13]  Timothy R. Coté,et al.  Emergence of orphan drugs in the United States: a quantitative assessment of the first 25 years , 2010, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[14]  Robert A. Beckman,et al.  Integrating predictive biomarkers and classifiers into oncology clinical development programmes , 2011, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[15]  Enrique Seoane-Vazquez,et al.  Incentives for orphan drug research and development in the United States , 2008, Orphanet journal of rare diseases.

[16]  S. Simoens Pricing and reimbursement of orphan drugs: the need for more transparency , 2011, Orphanet journal of rare diseases.

[17]  Jian Wang,et al.  Quantifying factors for the success of stratified medicine , 2011, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.