A new evaluation model for intellectual capital based on computing with linguistic variable

In a knowledge era, intellectual capital has become a determinant resource for enterprise to retain and improve competitive advantage. Because the nature of intellectual capital is abstract, intangible, and difficult to measure, it becomes a challenge for business managers to evaluate intellectual capital performance effectively. Recently, several methods have been proposed to assist business managers in evaluating performance of intellectual capital. However, they also face information loss problems while the processes of subjective evaluation integration. Therefore, this paper proposes a suitable model for intellectual capital performance evaluation by combining 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic approach with multiple criteria decision-making (MCDM) method. It is feasible to manipulate the processes of evaluation integration and avoid the information loss effectively. Based on the proposed model, its feasibility is demonstrated by the result of intellectual capital performance evaluation for a high-technology company in Taiwan.

[1]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  The Concepts of a Linguistic Variable and its Application to Approximate Reasoning , 1975 .

[2]  T. Engström,et al.  Evaluating intellectual capital in the hotel industry , 2003 .

[3]  Ching-Torng Lin,et al.  Bid/no-bid decision-making – a fuzzy linguistic approach , 2004 .

[4]  T. A. Stewart Intellectual Capital: The New Wealth of Organizations , 1997 .

[5]  Linda Chang,et al.  Managing intellectual capital in a professional service firm: exploring the creativity–productivity paradox , 2004 .

[6]  Ingoo Han,et al.  Prioritization and selection of intellectual capital measurement indicators using analytic hierarchy process for the mobile telecommunications industry , 2004, Expert Syst. Appl..

[7]  C. Stanworth,et al.  Retail franchising: an intellectual capital perspective , 2005 .

[8]  Karl-Erik Sveiby The New Organizational Wealth: Managing and Measuring Knowledge-Based Assets , 1997 .

[9]  Oscar Cordón,et al.  A model of fuzzy linguistic IRS based on multi-granular linguistic information , 2003, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[10]  J. Mouritsen,et al.  Constructing intellectual capital statements , 2001 .

[11]  Luiz Antonio Joia,et al.  Measuring intangible corporate assets: Linking business strategy with intellectual capital , 2000 .

[12]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  A 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words , 2000, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst..

[13]  Joel A. C. Baum,et al.  Picking winners or building them? Alliance, intellectual, and human capital as selection criteria in venture financing and performance of biotechnology startups , 2004 .

[14]  Reay-Chen Wang,et al.  Group decision-making using a fuzzy linguistic approach for evaluating the flexibility in a manufacturing system , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[15]  Smiti Gandhi,et al.  Knowledge management and reference services , 2004 .

[16]  C. Eckstein,et al.  The measurement and recognition of intangible assets: then and now , 2004 .

[17]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  Incorporating filtering techniques in a fuzzy linguistic multi-agent model for information gathering on the web , 2004, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[18]  K. Wiig Integrating intellectual capital and knowledge management , 1997 .

[19]  H. Zimmermann,et al.  Fuzzy Set Theory and Its Applications , 1993 .

[20]  Enrique Herrera-Viedma,et al.  Evaluating the informative quality of documents in SGML format from judgements by means of fuzzy linguistic techniques based on computing with words , 2003, Inf. Process. Manag..

[21]  Karl-Heinz Leitner,et al.  Managing and reporting knowledge-based resources and processes in research organisations: specifics, lessons learned and perspectives , 2004 .

[22]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  Choice processes for non-homogeneous group decision making in linguistic setting , 1998, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[23]  Ronald R. Yager,et al.  An approach to ordinal decision making , 1995, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[24]  J. Liebowitz,et al.  Does measuring knowledge make “cents”? , 1999 .