Role of Occlusion in Non-Coulombic Slip of the Finger Pad

Understanding how fingers slip on surfaces is essential for elucidating the mechanisms of haptic perception. This paper describes an investigation of the relationship between occlusion and the non-Coulombic slip of the finger pad, which results in the frictional force being a power law function of the normal load, with an index \( n \); Coulombic slip corresponds to \( n = 1 \). For smooth impermeable surfaces, occlusion of moisture excreted by the sweat glands may cause up to an order of magnitude increase in the coefficient of friction with a characteristic time of ~20 s. This arises because the moisture plasticises the asperities on the finger print ridges resulting in an increase in their compliance and hence an increase in the contact area. Under such steady state sliding conditions a finger pad behaves like a Hertzian contact decorated with the valleys between the finger print ridges, which only act to reduce the true but not the nominal contact area. In the limit, at long occlusion times (~50 s), it can be shown that the power law index tends to a value in the range \( {2 \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {2 {3 \le n \le 1}}} \right. \kern-0pt} {3 \le n \le 1}} \). In contrast, measurements against a rough surface demonstrate that the friction is not affected by occlusion and that a finger pad exhibits Coulombic slip.

[1]  D. C. Lin,et al.  Spherical indentation of soft matter beyond the Hertzian regime: numerical and experimental validation of hyperelastic models , 2009, Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology.

[2]  V. Hayward,et al.  Finger pad friction and its role in grip and touch , 2013, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[3]  M. Cartmill The volar skin of primates: its frictional characteristics and their functional significance. , 1979, American journal of physical anthropology.

[4]  Vincent Hayward,et al.  On the 1/f noise and non-integer harmonic decay of the interaction of a finger sliding on flat and sinusoidal surfaces , 2011, 2011 IEEE World Haptics Conference.

[5]  Michael Wolfe,et al.  J+ = J , 1994, ACM SIGPLAN Notices.

[6]  Matt Carré,et al.  Human finger contact with small, triangular ridged surfaces , 2011 .

[7]  M. Hollins,et al.  Vibrotactile adaptation impairs discrimination of fine, but not coarse, textures. , 2001, Somatosensory & motor research.

[8]  J. Barbera,et al.  Contact mechanics , 1999 .

[9]  S. Derler,et al.  Understanding the variation of friction coefficients of human skin as a function of skin hydration and interfacial water films , 2015 .

[10]  R. Candelier,et al.  Texture-induced modulations of friction force: the fingerprint effect. , 2011, Physical review letters.

[11]  M. Adams,et al.  The friction and adhesion of elastomers , 2001 .

[12]  Vincent Hayward,et al.  Slip-induced vibration influences the grip reflex: a pilot study , 2013, 2013 World Haptics Conference (WHC).

[13]  Michael J. Adams,et al.  Friction of the Human Finger Pad: Influence of Moisture, Occlusion and Velocity , 2011 .

[14]  V Hayward,et al.  Effect of skin hydration on the dynamics of fingertip gripping contact , 2011, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[15]  Vincent Hayward,et al.  Minimal adhesion surface area in tangentially loaded digital contacts. , 2011, Journal of biomechanics.

[16]  R. Howe,et al.  Dynamic contact of the human fingerpad against a flat surface. , 1999, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[17]  B. Lincoln Elastic Deformation and the Laws of Friction , 1953, Nature.

[18]  A. R. Ennos,et al.  Fingerprints are unlikely to increase the friction of primate fingerpads , 2009, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[19]  M. Adams,et al.  A micromechanical model for the confined uni-axial compression of an assembly of elastically deforming spherical particles , 1997 .