Antagonist binding profile of the split chimeric muscarinic m2-trunc/m3-tail receptor.

Recent evidence suggests that G-protein-coupled receptors can behave as multiple subunit receptors, and can be split into parts, maintaining their binding ability. Transfection of a truncated muscarinic m2 receptor (containing transmembrane domains I-V, named m2-trunc) with a gene fragment coding for the carboxyl-terminal receptor portion of the muscarinic m3 receptor (containing transmembrane domains VI and VII, named m3-tail) results in the formation of a binding site with a high affinity for the muscarinic ligand N-[3H]methylscopolamine. In this paper we analyse the antagonist binding profile of this chimeric m2-trunc/m3-tail receptor in comparison with the wild-type muscarinic m2 and m3 receptors. While many of the substances tested had an intermediate affinity for the chimeric m2-trunc/m3-tail receptor compared with m2 and m3, some compounds were able to distinguish between the chimeric m2-trunc/m3-tail receptor on the one hand and the m2 or the m3 receptor on the other. Among them, tripitramine (a high-affinity M2 receptor antagonist) bound to the m2-trunc/m3-tail receptor with the same affinity as m2, but it bound to the m3 receptor with a 103-fold lower affinity; pirenzepine (a selective muscarinic M1 receptor antagonist) bound to the chimeric receptor with an affinity that was 12- and 3-fold higher than that of m2 and m3, respectively. The results of this study demonstrate that the chimeric m2-trunc/m3-tail receptor has a pharmacological profile distinct from that of the originating muscarinic m2 and m3 receptors.

[1]  T. Bonner,et al.  Identification of a family of muscarinic acetylcholine receptor genes. , 1987, Science.

[2]  Jie Liu,et al.  Plasma Membrane Localization and Functional Rescue of Truncated Forms of a G Protein-coupled Receptor (*) , 1995, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[3]  A. Minarini,et al.  Binding profile of the selective muscarinic receptor antagonist tripitramine. , 1994, European journal of pharmacology.

[4]  B. Cullen Use of eukaryotic expression technology in the functional analysis of cloned genes. , 1987, Methods in enzymology.

[5]  J. Nakai,et al.  Location of a region of the muscarinic acetylcholine receptor involved in selective effector coupling , 1988, FEBS letters.

[6]  J. Wess,et al.  Functional rescue of mutant V2 vasopressin receptors causing nephrogenic diabetes insipidus by a co‐expressed receptor polypeptide. , 1996, The EMBO journal.

[7]  M. Caron,et al.  Chimeric alpha 2-,beta 2-adrenergic receptors: delineation of domains involved in effector coupling and ligand binding specificity. , 1988, Science.

[8]  J. Wess,et al.  Chimeric m2/m3 muscarinic receptors: role of carboxyl terminal receptor domains in selectivity of ligand binding and coupling to phosphoinositide hydrolysis. , 1990, Molecular pharmacology.

[9]  J. Wess,et al.  Reconstitution of functional muscarinic receptors by co‐expression of amino‐ and carboxyl‐terminal receptor fragments , 1993, FEBS letters.

[10]  A. Ashkenazi,et al.  Distinct primary structures, ligand‐binding properties and tissue‐specific expression of four human muscarinic acetylcholine receptors. , 1987, The EMBO journal.

[11]  D. Engelman,et al.  Membrane protein folding and oligomerization: the two-stage model. , 1990, Biochemistry.

[12]  F. Vaglini,et al.  Stereoselective inhibition of muscarinic receptor subtypes by the eight stereoisomers related to rociverine. , 1995, European journal of pharmacology.

[13]  O. H. Lowry,et al.  Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. , 1951, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[14]  T. Bonner,et al.  Cloning and expression of the human and rat m5 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor genes , 1988, Neuron.