Prevalence and influencing factors for artifact development in breast MRI-derived maximum intensity projections

BACKGROUND Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides high diagnostic sensitivity for breast cancer. However, MRI artifacts may impede the diagnostic assessment. This is particularly important when evaluating maximum intensity projections (MIPs), such as in abbreviated MRI (AB-MRI) protocols, because high image quality is desired as a result of fewer sequences being available to compensate for problems. PURPOSE To describe the prevalence of artifacts on dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) MRI-derived MIPs and to investigate potentially associated attributes. MATERIAL AND METHODS For this institutional review board approved retrospective analysis, MIPs were generated from subtraction series and cropped to represent the left and right breasts as regions of interest. These images were labeled by three independent raters regarding the presence of MRI artifacts. MRI artifact prevalence and associations with patient characteristics and technical attributes were analyzed using descriptive statistics and generalized linear models (GLMMs). RESULTS The study included 2524 examinations from 1794 patients (median age 50 years), performed on 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla MRI systems. Overall inter-rater agreement was kappa = 0.54. Prevalence of significant unilateral artifacts was 29.2% (736/2524), whereas bilateral artifacts were present in 37.8% (953/2524) of all examinations. According to the GLMM, artifacts were significantly positive associated with age (odds ratio [OR] = 1.52) and magnetic field strength (OR = 1.55), whereas a negative effect could be shown for body mass index (OR = 0.95). CONCLUSION MRI artifacts on DCE subtraction MIPs of the breast, as used in AB-MRI, are a relevant topic. Our results show that, besides the magnetic field strength, further associated attributes are patient age and body mass index, which can provide possible targets for artifact reduction.

[1]  E. Wenkel,et al.  Automated artifact detection in abbreviated dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI-derived maximum intensity projections (MIPs) of the breast , 2022, European Radiology.

[2]  Eun Sook Ko,et al.  Breast Cancer Screening with Abbreviated Breast MRI: 3-year Outcome Analysis. , 2021, Radiology.

[3]  C. Zuiani,et al.  Side of contrast injection and breast size correlate with motion artifacts grade and image quality on breast MRI , 2020, Acta radiologica.

[4]  C. Kuhl Abbreviated Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) for Breast Cancer Screening: Rationale, Concept, and Transfer to Clinical Practice. , 2019, Annual review of medicine.

[5]  Sebastian Bickelhaupt,et al.  Abbreviated MRI Protocols in Breast Cancer Diagnostics , 2018, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[6]  T. Helbich,et al.  Abbreviated MRI of the Breast: Does It Provide Value? , 2018, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[7]  M E Ladd,et al.  Maximum intensity breast diffusion MRI for BI-RADS 4 lesions detected on X-ray mammography. , 2017, Clinical radiology.

[8]  Shuang-Qing Chen,et al.  Abbreviated MRI Protocols for Detecting Breast Cancer in Women with Dense Breasts , 2017, Korean journal of radiology.

[9]  T. Abe B1 homogeneity of breast MRI using RF shimming with individual specific values in volunteers simulating patients after mastectomy , 2016, Acta radiologica.

[10]  Ralph T. Wynn,et al.  Artifacts in Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging. , 2016, Current problems in diagnostic radiology.

[11]  F. Laun,et al.  Fast and Noninvasive Characterization of Suspicious Lesions Detected at Breast Cancer X-Ray Screening: Capability of Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging with MIPs. , 2016, Radiology.

[12]  Sora C. Yoon,et al.  Abbreviated screening protocol for breast MRI: a feasibility study. , 2015, Academic radiology.

[13]  T. Helbich,et al.  Breast MRI: EUSOBI recommendations for women’s information , 2015, European Radiology.

[14]  Yongming Dai,et al.  Dual-source parallel radiofrequency transmission for magnetic resonance breast imaging at 3T: any added clinical value? , 2014, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[15]  G. Simonetti,et al.  Breast MRI artefacts: evaluation and solutions in 630 consecutive patients. , 2013, Clinical radiology.

[16]  Nicola Brown,et al.  The relationship between breast size and anthropometric characteristics , 2012, American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council.

[17]  Fraser Robb,et al.  Custom‐fitted 16‐channel bilateral breast coil for bidirectional parallel imaging , 2011, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[18]  Darrell N. Smith,et al.  Negative pressure fixation device to reduce motion artifacts on contrast‐enhanced MRI of the breast: A clinical feasibility study , 2009, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[19]  M. Mahoney,et al.  Recognizing and interpreting artifacts and pitfalls in MR imaging of the breast. , 2007, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[20]  Jennifer A Harvey,et al.  Breast MR imaging artifacts: how to recognize and fix them. , 2007, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[21]  Michael Weber,et al.  Motion artifacts, lesion type, and parenchymal enhancement in breast MRI: what does really influence diagnostic accuracy? , 2019, Acta radiologica.

[22]  Mi Young Kim,et al.  Usefulness of abbreviated breast MRI screening for women with a history of breast cancer surgery , 2017, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[23]  Karel G M Moons,et al.  Meta-analysis of MR imaging in the diagnosis of breast lesions. , 2008, Radiology.

[24]  Jiachen Zhuo,et al.  AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: MR artifacts, safety, and quality control. , 2006, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[25]  J. Fleiss Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. , 1971 .