Mechanism as Mind - What Tensegrities and Caterpillars Can Teach Us about Soft Robotics

With recent advances in materials, interest is being applied to the idea of robots with few if any rigid parts, able to substantially deform themselves in order to flow around, and even through objects. In order to accomplish these goals in an efficient and affordable manner, space and power will be at a premium, and so soft robots will most likely be both underactuated and under-controlled. One approach to actuation and control lies in embodying portions of both tasks within the structural dynamics of the robot itself. Such ”morphological computation” is known to exist throughout the biological world, from the behavior of cellular cytoskeletons up to the tendinous network of the human hand. Here we present two examples of morphological computation one from biology, the manduca sexta caterpillar, and one from engineering, a modular tensegrity tower and explore how ideas from these realms can be applied toward locomotion and control of a highly articulate, under-controlled, soft robot.

[1]  R. Fuller,et al.  Synergetics: Explorations in the Geometry of Thinking , 1975 .

[2]  J. Truman,et al.  Dendritic reorganization of abdominal motoneurons during metamorphosis of the moth, Manduca sexta , 1985, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[3]  D. Ingber The architecture of life. , 1998, Scientific American.

[4]  R. Connelly,et al.  Mathematics and Tensegrity , 1998, American Scientist.

[5]  Craig D. McGray,et al.  The self-reconfiguring robotic molecule , 1998, Proceedings. 1998 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.98CH36146).

[6]  Christopher J. Bishop,et al.  Pulsed Neural Networks , 1998 .

[7]  Mark Yim,et al.  PolyBot: a modular reconfigurable robot , 2000, Proceedings 2000 ICRA. Millennium Conference. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Symposia Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37065).

[8]  Robert E. Skelton,et al.  Dynamics of the shell class of tensegrity structures , 2001, J. Frankl. Inst..

[9]  R. Full,et al.  A motor and a brake: two leg extensor muscles acting at the same joint manage energy differently in a running insect. , 2002, The Journal of experimental biology.

[10]  René Motro,et al.  Tensegrity: Structural Systems for the Future , 2003 .

[11]  Diego Arbelaez,et al.  Active vibration control of a three-stage tensegrity structure , 2004, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[12]  A. Biewener,et al.  Dynamics of leg muscle function in tammar wallabies (M. eugenii) during level versus incline hopping , 2004, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[13]  B. Trimmer,et al.  The biomechanical and neural control of hydrostatic limb movements in Manduca sexta , 2004, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[14]  B. Trimmer,et al.  Muscle performance in a soft-bodied terrestrial crawler: constitutive modelling of strain-rate dependency , 2008, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[15]  B. Trimmer,et al.  Kinematics of Soft-bodied, Legged Locomotion in Manduca sexta Larvae , 2007, The Biological Bulletin.

[16]  Chandana Paul,et al.  The Tendon Network of the Fingers Performs Anatomical Computation at a Macroscopic Scale , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[17]  D. Kaplan,et al.  Biosynthesis and Applications of Silk‐like and Collagen‐like Proteins , 2007 .

[18]  Barry A. Trimmer,et al.  New challenges in biorobotics: Incorporating soft tissue into control systems , 2008 .

[19]  D. Tyler,et al.  Stimuli-Responsive Polymer Nanocomposites Inspired by the Sea Cucumber Dermis , 2008, Science.