Evaluation of a rapid screening test for rifampicin resistance in re-treatment tuberculosis patients in the Eastern Cape.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Patients with multidrug-resistant (MDR) tuberculosis (TB) are at high risk of treatment failure. It is anticipated that early identification of MDR-TB and appropriate treatment will improve patient outcome and disease control. We evaluated the rapid detection of rifampicin resistance in previously treated TB patients, directly from acidfast bacilli (AFB)-positive sputum using a phage-based test, FASTPlaque-Response (Biotec Laboratories Ltd, Ipswich, UK). The ability of rifampicin resistance to predict MDR-TB was also determined. DESIGN A prospective study was done comparing performance of the rapid phage test with conventional culture and drug susceptibility testing (DST) in AFB-positive TB patients. SETTING Five primary health clinics and one TB referral centre in the Port Elizabeth Metropolitan area, Eastern Cape. OUTCOME MEASURES Sensitivity, specificity and overall accuracy of the phage test were determined compared with gold standard culture and DST. Discrepant results were resolved by molecular detection of mutations conferring rifampicin resistance. The proportion of rifampicin-resistant strains that were MDR was also determined. RESULTS Previously treated patients were at a high risk of MDRTB (35.7%). Sensitivity, specificity and overall accuracy of FASTPlaque-Response for rifampicin resistance determination were 95.4% (95% confidence interval (CI): 91.0 - 99.8%), 97.2% (95% CI: 94.5 - 99.9%) and 96.5% (95% CI: 94.1 - 98.9%) respectively compared with conventional DST (unresolved), calculated for specimens that had both FASTPlaque-Response and conventional DST results available. FASTPlaque-Response results were available in 2 days instead of 28 - 85 days with conventional DST. However, only 70.6% of FASTPlaque-Response results were interpretable compared with 86.3% of conventional DST results. The majority (95.5%) of rifampicinresistant strains were MDR-TB. CONCLUSIONS Rapid detection of rifampicin resistance using FASTPlaque-Response could contribute to improved management of patients at risk of MDR-TB, such as previously treated patients. However, improvement in control of specimen-related contamination is needed to ensure that a higher proportion of FASTPlaque-Response results are interpretable. Where indicated, early modification of therapy could improve patient prognosis and reduce disease transmission.

[1]  H. Albert,et al.  Simple, phage-based (FASTPplaque) technology to determine rifampicin resistance of Mycobacterium tuberculosis directly from sputum. , 2004, The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease.

[2]  H. Mohtady,et al.  Evaluation of a rapid bacteriophage-based method for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in clinical samples. , 2003, Journal of medical microbiology.

[3]  L. Doğancı,et al.  Evaluation of FASTPlaqueTB-RIF for determination of rifampicin resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex isolates. , 2003, The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease.

[4]  S. Batool,et al.  Evaluation of the FASTPlaqueTB assay for direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in sputum specimens. , 2002, The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease.

[5]  A. Heydenrych,et al.  Performance of a rapid phage-based test, FASTPlaqueTB, to diagnose pulmonary tuberculosis from sputum specimens in South Africa. , 2002, The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease.

[6]  L. Blumberg,et al.  Evaluation of FASTPlaqueTB-RIF, a rapid, manual test for the determination of rifampicin resistance from Mycobacterium tuberculosis cultures. , 2001, The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease.

[7]  M. Perkins,et al.  Infection and disease among household contacts of patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. , 2001, The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease.

[8]  A. Khomenko,et al.  Standard short-course chemotherapy for drug-resistant tuberculosis: treatment outcomes in 6 countries. , 2000, JAMA.

[9]  P. V. van Helden,et al.  Detection of mutations in drug resistance genes of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by a dot-blot hybridization strategy. , 1999, Tubercle and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease.

[10]  Sonya S. Shin,et al.  The dilemma of MDR-TB in the global era. , 1998, The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease.

[11]  F. Drobniewski,et al.  Evaluation of a new rapid bacteriophage-based method for the drug susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis , 1997, Nature Medicine.

[12]  M. Westwater Multidrug resistant tuberculosis in South Africa , 1996, The Lancet.

[13]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[14]  J. Bayona,et al.  Identifying early treatment failure on category I therapy for pulmonary tuberculosis in Lima Ciudad, Peru. , 2004, The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease.

[15]  A. Laszlo,et al.  Anti-tuberculosis drug resistance in the world. Fourth global report. The WHO / IUATLD Global Project on Anti-Tuberculosis Drug Resistance Surveillance 2002-2007. , 2003 .

[16]  Donald A. Enarson,et al.  Management of tuberculosis : a guide for low income countries , 2000 .

[17]  C. Dye,et al.  Anti-tuberculosis drug resistance in the world: The WHO/IUATLD Global Project on Anti-Tuberculosis Drug Resistance Surveillance. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1997. 228pp. Price Sw. fr 25/US$22.50 (in developing countries Sw. fir 17.50). (Reference WHO/TB/97.229) , 1998 .