Semantic pointing: improving target acquisition with control-display ratio adaptation

We introduce semantic pointing, a novel interaction technique that improves target acquisition in graphical user interfaces (GUIs). Semantic pointing uses two independent sizes for each potential target presented to the user: one size in motor space adapted to its importance for the manipulation, and one size in visual space adapted to the amount of information it conveys. This decoupling between visual and motor size is achieved by changing the control-to-display ratio according to cursor distance to nearby targets. We present a controlled experiment supporting our hypothesis that the performance of semantic pointing is given by Fitts' index of difficulty in motor rather than visual space. We apply semantic pointing to the redesign of traditional GUI widgets by taking advantage of the independent manipulation of motor and visual widget sizes.

[1]  P. Fitts.  The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.

[2]  G. W. Furnas,et al.  Generalized fisheye views , 1986, CHI '86.

[3]  Benjamin L. Somberg,et al.  A comparison of rule-based and positionally constant arrangements of computer menu items , 1986, CHI '87.

[4]  M. Weiser,et al.  An empirical comparison of pie vs. linear menus , 1988, CHI '88.

[5]  I. MacKenzie,et al.  A note on the information-theoretic basis of Fitts' law. , 1989, Journal of motor behavior.

[6]  J. Mitchell,et al.  Dynamic versus static menus: an exploratory comparison , 1989, SGCH.

[7]  MacKenzie Is.  A Note on the Information-Theoretic Basis for Fitts’ Law , 1989 .

[8]  I. Scott MacKenzie,et al.  Effects of output display and control - display gain on human performance in interactive systems , 1994, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[9]  Benjamin B. Bederson,et al.  Space-scale diagrams: understanding multiscale interfaces , 1995, CHI '95.

[10]  S. H. Sato,et al.  Interaction design for large displays , 1997, INTR.

[11]  D V Keyson,et al.  Dynamic cursor gain and tactual feedback in the capture of cursor movements. , 1997, Ergonomics.

[12]  Krishna Bharat,et al.  Making computers easier for older adults to use: area cursors and sticky icons , 1997, CHI.

[13]  Ivan Poupyrev,et al.  Non-isomorphic 3D rotational techniques , 2000, CHI.

[14]  Takeo Igarashi,et al.  Speed-dependent automatic zooming for browsing large documents , 2000, UIST '00.

[15]  Benjamin B. Bederson,et al.  Fisheye menus , 2000, UIST '00.

[16]  Abderrahmane Kheddar,et al.  Pseudo-haptic feedback: can isometric input devices simulate force feedback? , 2000, Proceedings IEEE Virtual Reality 2000 (Cat. No.00CB37048).

[17]  Yves Guiard,et al.  Beyond the 10-bit Barrier: Fitts' Law in Multi-Scale Electronic Worlds , 2001, BCS HCI/IHM.

[18]  Ravin Balakrishnan,et al.  Acquisition of expanding targets , 2002, CHI.

[19]  Carl Gutwin.  Improving focus targeting in interactive fisheye views , 2002, CHI.

[20]  I.,et al.  Fitts' Law as a Research and Design Tool in Human-Computer Interaction , 1992, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[21]  George W. Fitzmaurice,et al.  StyleCam: interactive stylized 3D navigation using integrated spatial & temporal controls , 2002, UIST '02.

[22]  Mary Czerwinski,et al.  Drag-and-Pop and Drag-and-Pick: Techniques for Accessing Remote Screen Content on Touch- and Pen-Operated Systems , 2003, INTERACT.

[23]  Shumin Zhai,et al.  Human on-line response to target expansion , 2003, CHI '03.

[24]  Andy Cockburn,et al.  Improving the Acquisition of Small Targets , 2004 .