Detection of improper fixation in MTI photoscreening images.

PURPOSE To determine the effect of fixation shift on photoscreening crescents, the ability of human interpreters to detect fixation shift, and the potential improvement by image processing. METHODS MTI photoscreening (Medical Technologies & Innovations, Inc, Lancaster, PA) images, measured at 11 positions of gaze, were obtained from 10 subjects (9 with refractive error warranting spectacle correction). Photographs were taken with subjects fixating at 20, 15, 10, and 5 cm to the left and the right of the camera fixation target (1 m distant); 5 cm above and below the camera fixation target; and on-axis. Photographs were inspected by 11 experienced raters, who indicated if the subject appeared to be looking directly at the camera. The photographs were digitized, enlarged, contrast enhanced, and measured by 3 raters. For each photograph, distance from the corneal light reflex to the nasal limbus was measured and a measure of asymmetry computed. RESULTS Raters could reliably detect off-axis fixation greater than 10 cm away from the intended fixation target. Raters correctly identified on-axis subject viewing 73% of the time. Crescents became larger when the fixation shifted off-axis for both the myopic and hyperopic subjects. Image analysis correctly classified 10 of 10 on-axis measurements and 34 of 39 off-axis measurements. CONCLUSION Direct inspection of photoscreening images by trained raters can result in the failure to detect small but relevant errors of fixation. These fixation shifts can cause crescents to become larger than expected, resulting in false-positive classification. Image analysis offers a potential improvement in the detection of off-axis fixation in MTI photoscreening images.

[1]  K Kaakinen,et al.  A SIMPLE METHOD FOR SCREENING OF CHILDREN WITH STRABISMUS, ANISOMETROPIA OR AMETROPIA BY SIMULTANEOUS PHOTOGRAPHY OF THE CORNEAL AND THE FUNDUS REFLEXES , 1979, Acta ophthalmologica.

[2]  M. Maguire,et al.  A survey of vision screening policy of preschool children in the United States. , 1999, Survey of ophthalmology.

[3]  R. Wasserman,et al.  Preschool vision screening in pediatric practice: a study from the Pediatric Research in Office Settings (PROS) Network. American Academy of Pediatrics. , 1992, Pediatrics.

[4]  B J Kushner,et al.  The accuracy of experienced strabismologists using the Hirschberg and Krimsky tests. , 1998, Ophthalmology.

[5]  Marsh Wl,et al.  The reliability of interpretation of photoscreening results with the off PS-100 in Headstart preschool children. , 1995 .

[6]  O J Braddick,et al.  Eccentric Photorefraction: Optical Analysis and Empirical Measures , 1985, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[7]  K. Preston,et al.  Polaroid photoscreening for amblyogenic factors. An improved methodology. , 1992, Ophthalmology.

[8]  K Simons,et al.  Videographic Hirschberg measurement of simulated strabismic deviations. , 1993, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[9]  D L Guyton,et al.  Vertical location of the corneal light reflex in strabismus photography. , 1998, Archives of ophthalmology.

[10]  H. Burian,et al.  Binocular vision and ocular motility , 1975 .

[11]  J Wattam-Bell,et al.  Measurement of Astigmatism by Automated Infrared Photoretinoscopy , 1997, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[12]  D. Friendly,et al.  Treatment of eccentric fixation in children under four years of age. , 1966, American journal of ophthalmology.

[13]  Corneal topography and the hirschberg test. , 1992, Applied optics.

[14]  J. M. Miller,et al.  Quantification of the Brückner test for strabismus. , 1995, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[15]  W E Scott,et al.  Photoscreening for amblyogenic factors. , 1995, Journal of pediatric ophthalmology and strabismus.