Effect of glenoid prosthesis design on glenoid bone remodeling: adaptive finite element based simulation.

Glenoid prosthesis loosening is the most common cause for revision total shoulder arthroplasty. Improved glenoid prosthesis design requires looking beyond initial post-implantation static stress analyses. Adaptive bone remodeling simulations based on Wolff's law are needed for predicting long-term glenoid prosthesis results. This study demonstrates the capability of predicting glenoid bone remodeling produced by changing prosthesis design features. Twelve glenoid prostheses were designed to fit each of six donor human glenoids, using combinations of three peg types and four backing-peg material combinations (polyethylene and or metal). The twelve FE prosthesis models were individually combined, simulating surgical implantation, with the glenoid models. Remodeling simulations, using a validated adaptive bone remodeling simulation, commenced with homogeneous glenoid bone density. To produce bone remodeling, center, posterior-offset, and anterior-offset physiologic loads were consecutively applied to the bone-prosthesis FE models for 300 iterations. Upon completion, region-specific mean predicted bone apparent densities were compared between bone-prosthesis and intact glenoid FE models. Metal fixations significantly increased proximal-center bone density. Polyethylene fixations resulted in bone density approximately equal to intact. Two angled polyethylene peg designs with longer-anterior and shorter-posterior pegs, reflecting natural glenoid shape, best maintained mid and distal glenoid bone density. While these initial results were not validated, they demonstrate the capability and potential of adaptive glenoid bone remodeling simulation. We expect FE glenoid bone remodeling simulations to become powerful and robust tools in the design and evaluation of glenoid prostheses.

[1]  M Viceconti,et al.  Material properties assignment to finite element models of bone structures: a new method. , 1999, Medical engineering & physics.

[2]  R. Churchill,et al.  Glenoid size, inclination, and version: an anatomic study. , 2001, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[3]  J. C. Simo,et al.  Numerical instabilities in bone remodeling simulations: the advantages of a node-based finite element approach. , 1995, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  F van Keulen,et al.  The possibilities of uncemented glenoid component--a finite element study. , 2004, Clinical biomechanics.

[5]  Martin Rb Porosity and specific surface of bone. , 1984 .

[6]  U P Wyss,et al.  Loosening performance of cemented glenoid prosthesis design pairs. , 2001, Clinical biomechanics.

[7]  B F Morrey,et al.  Stress analyses of glenoid components in total shoulder arthroplasty. , 1999, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[8]  P. Büchler,et al.  A finite element model of the shoulder: application to the comparison of normal and osteoarthritic joints. , 2002, Clinical biomechanics.

[9]  G S Beaupré,et al.  Computer predictions of bone remodeling around porous-coated implants. , 1990, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[10]  R. Cofield Uncemented total shoulder arthroplasty. A review. , 1994, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[11]  J. Lynch,et al.  Glenoid component failure in total shoulder arthroplasty. , 2008, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[12]  Mark Taylor,et al.  Bone remodelling inside a cemented resurfaced femoral head. , 2006, Clinical biomechanics.

[13]  R. Cofield,et al.  Total shoulder arthroplasty with the Neer prosthesis: long-term results. , 1997, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[14]  Poppen Nk,et al.  Forces at the glenohumeral joint in abduction. , 1978 .

[15]  Patrick J McMahon,et al.  Adaptive glenoid bone remodeling simulation. , 2009, Journal of biomechanics.

[16]  Piet M. Rozing,et al.  Influence of glenohumeral prosthesis geometry and placement on shoulder muscle forces. , 1996 .

[17]  P J Prendergast,et al.  Three-dimensional finite element analysis of glenoid replacement prostheses: a comparison of keeled and pegged anchorage systems. , 2000, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[18]  P S Walker,et al.  Analysis of glenoid fixation for a reversed anatomy fixed-fulcrum shoulder replacement. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.

[19]  R. B. Ashman,et al.  Relations of mechanical properties to density and CT numbers in human bone. , 1995, Medical engineering & physics.

[20]  W. Walsh,et al.  Resurfacing of the glenoid in total shoulder arthroplasty. A comparison, at a mean of five years, of prostheses inserted with and without cement. , 1999, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[21]  C A Rockwood,et al.  Complications of total shoulder-replacement arthroplasty. , 1996, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[22]  A. Skirving Total shoulder arthroplasty — current problems and possible solutions , 1999, Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association.

[23]  N. Poppen,et al.  Forces at the glenohumeral joint in abduction. , 1978, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[24]  Joseph A Abboud,et al.  Total shoulder arthroplasty: glenoid component design. , 2005, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[25]  G. Beaupré,et al.  An approach for time‐dependent bone modeling and remodeling—application: A preliminary remodeling simulation , 1990, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[26]  D R Sumner,et al.  Adaptive bone remodeling around bonded noncemented total hip arthroplasty: A comparison between animal experiments and computer simulation , 1993, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[27]  D R Carter,et al.  Stress analyses of glenoid component designs. , 1988, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[28]  Andrew R Hopkins,et al.  Finite element models of total shoulder replacement: Application of boundary conditions , 2005, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.