The use of Social Network Analysis to explore relationships between the Medical Informatics and Information Systems literature

Health informatics (HI) research has evolved over several decades from its roots in computer science (CS) and artificial intelligence in medicine (AIM). Information Systems (IS) evolved independently, but recently IS within health environments are being embraced as a new test bed for Information Systems theories. The purpose of this paper is to present an objective view of the level of cross reference between the IS and MI bodies of literature, and to either provide evidence of uptake of IS theories in HI or of outlets that would provide appropriate targets for such work due to their antecedents and influence. The extent of the cross fertilization between the two disciplines is still thought to be low. Using social network analysis (SNA) we present an exploratory study which identifies the bridges and cutpoints within a basket of 44 key journals and identify the impact of Information Systems research on the Health Informatics discipline. This work is informed by a number of recent studies using this approach.

[1]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Using Social Network Analysis to Analyze Relationships Among IS Journals , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[2]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Top-down decomposition of the Journal Citation Reportof the Social Science Citation Index: Graph- and factor-analytical approaches , 2004, Scientometrics.

[3]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  The centrality and prestige of CACM , 2008, CACM.

[4]  Alexander I. Pudovkin,et al.  Algorithmic procedure for finding semantically related journals , 2002, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[5]  Riyaz Sikora,et al.  Assessing the relative influence of journals in a citation network , 2005, CACM.

[6]  Paula Otero,et al.  Evolution of medical informatics in bibliographic databases , 2004, MedInfo.

[7]  Mike Chiasson,et al.  Pushing the contextual envelope: developing and diffusing IS theory for health information systems research , 2004, Inf. Organ..

[8]  J A Kors,et al.  Mapping the Domain of Medical Informatics , 2009, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[9]  Bonnie Kaplan,et al.  Expanding multi-disciplinary approaches to healthcare information technologies: What does information systems offer medical informatics? , 2007, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[10]  Sridhar P. Nerur,et al.  Research Themes and Trends in Health Information Systems , 2008, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[11]  Bonnie Kaplan,et al.  Evaluating informatics applications - some alternative approaches: theory, social interactionism, and call for methodological pluralism , 2001, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[12]  Theodore A. Morris.  Structural relationships within medical informatics , 2000, AMIA.

[13]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Clusters and Maps of Science Journals Based on Bi-connected Graphs in the Journal Citation Reports , 2009, ArXiv.

[14]  Theodore A. Morris.  How Others See Us: An Information Science and Technology Perspective on Medical Informatics , 2001, AMIA.

[15]  K. McCain,et al.  The structure of medical informatics journal literature. , 1998, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[16]  Kathleen M. Carley,et al.  Research Paper: A Longitudinal Social Network Analysis of the Editorial Boards of Medical Informatics and Bioinformatics Journals , 2007, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[17]  Mike Chiasson,et al.  Getting the two to dance: examining barriers to health information systems research in mainstream IS journals , 2002, Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[18]  Theodore Morris.  Visualizing the Structure of Medical Informatics Using Term Co-Occurrence Analysis. , 2000 .