Using smartphone technology to deliver a virtual pedestrian environment: usability and validation

Various programs effectively teach children to cross streets more safely, but all are labor- and cost-intensive. Recent developments in mobile phone technology offer opportunity to deliver virtual reality pedestrian environments to mobile smartphone platforms. Such an environment may offer a cost- and labor-effective strategy to teach children to cross streets safely. This study evaluated usability, feasibility, and validity of a smartphone-based virtual pedestrian environment. A total of 68 adults completed 12 virtual crossings within each of two virtual pedestrian environments, one delivered by smartphone and the other a semi-immersive kiosk virtual environment. Participants completed self-report measures of perceived realism and simulator sickness experienced in each virtual environment, plus self-reported demographic and personality characteristics. All participants followed system instructions and used the smartphone-based virtual environment without difficulty. No significant simulator sickness was reported or observed. Users rated the smartphone virtual environment as highly realistic. Convergent validity was detected, with many aspects of pedestrian behavior in the smartphone-based virtual environment matching behavior in the kiosk virtual environment. Anticipated correlations between personality and kiosk virtual reality pedestrian behavior emerged for the smartphone-based system. A smartphone-based virtual environment can be usable and valid. Future research should develop and evaluate such a training system.

[1]  Robert S. Kennedy,et al.  Simulator Sickness Questionnaire: An enhanced method for quantifying simulator sickness. , 1993 .

[2]  E. Zerhouni.  Translational and clinical science--time for a new vision. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  Tal Oron-Gilad,et al.  Are child-pedestrians able to identify hazardous traffic situations? Measuring their abilities in a virtual reality environment , 2015 .

[4]  Pedestrian mortality between 2006 and 2010 in China: findings from non-police reported data. , 2013, Biomedical and environmental sciences : BES.

[5]  Nobhojit Roy,et al.  The global burden of injury: incidence, mortality, disability-adjusted life years and time trends from the Global Burden of Disease study 2013 , 2015, Injury Prevention.

[6]  W. Roper,et al.  Public health policy for preventing violence. , 1993, Health affairs.

[7]  W. Bles,et al.  Motion sickness. , 2000, Current opinion in neurology.

[8]  M J Griffin,et al.  Motion sickness in public road transport: passenger behavior and susceptibility. , 1999, Ergonomics.

[9]  S. Srivastava,et al.  The Big Five Trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. , 1999 .

[10]  J. Grimshaw,et al.  Knowledge translation of research findings , 2012, Implementation Science.

[11]  Benjamin D. Hennig,et al.  mHealth Possibilities in a Changing World. Distribution of Global Cell Phone Subscriptions , 2013 .

[12]  Benjamin K Barton,et al.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of behavioral interventions to improve child pedestrian safety. , 2014, Journal of pediatric psychology.

[13]  Michael R. Corbett,et al.  Using a Virtual Environment to Examine How Children Cross Streets: Advancing Our Understanding of How Injury Risk Arises. , 2016, Journal of pediatric psychology.

[14]  Virginia Sisiopiku,et al.  Community-based pedestrian safety training in virtual reality: A pragmatic trial. , 2016, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[15]  O. John,et al.  Los Cinco Grandes across cultures and ethnic groups: multitrait multimethod analyses of the Big Five in Spanish and English. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[16]  David A. Chambers,et al.  National Institutes of Health approaches to dissemination and implementation science: current and future directions. , 2012, American journal of public health.

[17]  Joan Severson,et al.  Validation of virtual reality as a tool to understand and prevent child pedestrian injury. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[18]  J. Thomson,et al.  Influence of virtual reality training on the roadside crossing judgments of child pedestrians. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[19]  James Hartley,et al.  Children in traffic , 1975 .

[20]  N. A. Adesso.  An Evaluation of the Champaign-Urbana Safety Town Program. , 1974 .

[21]  Benjamin Watson,et al.  VR for the Elderly: Quantitative and Qualitative Differences in Performance with a Driving Simulator , 1999, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[22]  Johnell O Brooks,et al.  Simulator sickness during driving simulation studies. , 2010, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[23]  Laura L. Arns,et al.  The relationship between age and incidence of cybersickness among immersive environment users , 2005, IEEE Proceedings. VR 2005. Virtual Reality, 2005..

[24]  O. John,et al.  Los Cinco Grandes across cultures and ethnic groups: multitrait multimethod analyses of the Big Five in Spanish and English. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[25]  Kirstie. Whelan,et al.  A COMMUNITY APPROACH TO ROAD SAFETY EDUCATION USING PRACTICAL TRAINING METHODS. THE DRUMCHAPEL PROJECT , 1997 .