Gynecological laparoscopy in residency training program: Dutch perspectives

BackgroundImplementation of laparoscopy into residency training is difficult. This study was conducted to assess the current state of implementation of laparoscopic surgery into gynecological residency program, to identify factors influencing laparoscopic skills training, and to find solutions toward better training and implementation.MethodsIn 2003 a questionnaire was sent to all 68 postgraduate year 5 and year 6 residents in obstetrics and gynecology in The Netherlands. The questionnaire addressed demographics, performance of laparoscopy, self-perceived competence, simulator training, and factors influencing laparoscopic training in residency.ResultsOf the 68 residents, 60 (88%) responded; 46 (37%) were men and 78 (63%) women. Men showed significant higher mean self-perceived competence in some laparoscopic procedures than women. Of the respondents, 20% had no advanced laparoscopic gynecologist present in their teaching hospital. Residents felt that simulator training is important in relation to their performance in the operating room. Of all gynecological teaching hospitals in the Netherlands, 55% did not have the opportunity of simulator training. Of the respondents who had the possibility of simulator training, 33% did not use the simulator voluntarily. Residents who trained on a simulator felt training was significantly more important (p = 0.02) than residents who never practiced on a simulator. Respondents’ laparoscopic skills were subjectively evaluated in the operating room (92%) or were evaluated based on the number of laparoscopic procedures performed as primary surgeon (49%). Of the respondents, 47% were satisfied with their current laparoscopic skills and 27% also felt prepared for the more advanced procedures. Not having been primary surgeon in nonacademic teaching hospitals and even more so in academic teaching hospitals (p < 0.05) was a limiting factor in acquiring laparoscopic skills.ConclusionsIncorporation of basic laparoscopic procedures into residency training has been successful; however, advanced procedures are not. Simulator training is still in its infancy in The Netherlands, is not frequently used voluntarily, and should be mandatory during residency. Acquired laparoscopic skills on a simulator and in the operating room should be objectively assessed, and above all, training of trainers is imperative.

[1]  C. Schlachta,et al.  Minimally invasive surgical practice: a survey of general surgeons in Ontario. , 2004, Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie.

[2]  F. Loh,et al.  The impact of minimal access surgery on gynaecological surgery in a university gynaecological unit over a 10-year period from 1991 to 2000. , 2002, Singapore medical journal.

[3]  R S Haluck,et al.  Computers and virtual reality for surgical education in the 21st century. , 2000, Archives of surgery.

[4]  R. Reznick,et al.  Objective structured assessment of technical skill (OSATS) for surgical residents , 1997, The British journal of surgery.

[5]  D. Rattner,et al.  The need for training opportunities in advanced laparoscopic surgery , 2001, Surgical Endoscopy.

[6]  F. Penninckx,et al.  Laparoscopic training: results of a Belgian survey in trainees. Belgian Group for Endoscopic Surgery (BGES). , 1999, Acta chirurgica Belgica.

[7]  E C Poulin,et al.  Minimally invasive surgery training in Canada: a survey of general surgery. , 2003, Surgical endoscopy.

[8]  S. Amini,et al.  Impact of work hour restrictions on resident case experience in an obstetrics and gynecology residency program. , 2004, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[9]  J. Hunter.  The case for fellowships in gastrointestinal and laparoendoscopic surgery. , 2002, Surgery.

[10]  A. Gallagher,et al.  An ergonomic analysis of the fulcrum effect in the acquisition of endoscopic skills. , 1998, Endoscopy.

[11]  N. Hogle,et al.  The impact of a full-time director of minimally invasive surgery , 2000, Surgical Endoscopy.

[12]  Nader N Massarweh,et al.  Laparoscopic virtual reality training: are 30 repetitions enough? , 2004, The Journal of surgical research.

[13]  R. Reznick,et al.  Testing technical skill via an innovative "bench station" examination. , 1997, American journal of surgery.

[14]  J. J. Jakimowicz,et al.  Minimal-access surgery training in the Netherlands: a survey among residents-in-training for general surgery , 2004, Surgical Endoscopy.

[15]  A. Park,et al.  Ongoing deficits in resident training for minimally invasive surgery , 2002, Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.

[16]  H. Sangi-Haghpeykar,et al.  Perceived proficiency in endoscopic techniques among senior obstetrics and gynecology residents. , 2002, The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists.

[17]  M. Monga,et al.  Urology practice patterns after residency training in laparoscopy. , 2002, Journal of endourology.

[18]  M. Heineman,et al.  Declining trend in major gynaecological surgery in The Netherlands during 1991–1998. Is there an impact on surgical skills and innovative ability? , 2001, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[19]  D. Fenner,et al.  Development of a Bench Station Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills , 2001, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[20]  Vadim Sherman,et al.  Using simulators to assess laparoscopic competence: ready for widespread use? , 2004, Surgery.

[21]  Michael S Nussbaum.  Surgical Endoscopy Training is Integral to General Surgery Residency and Should Be Integrated Into Residency and Fellowships Abandoned , 2002, Seminars in laparoscopic surgery.

[22]  Guidelines for surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES). , 1998, Surgical endoscopy.