Efficacy of spinal cord stimulation as adjuvant therapy for intractable angina pectoris: a prospective, randomized clinical study. Working Group on Neurocardiology.

OBJECTIVES In a prospective, randomized study with an 8-week follow-up period, we evaluated the efficacy of spinal cord stimulation on exercise capacity and quality of life in patients with intractable angina. BACKGROUND Despite important achievements in therapy for ischemic heart disease, there remain patients with intractable symptoms of angina. In uncontrolled observations, several investigators have reported beneficial effects of spinal cord stimulation as an additional therapy for patients with angina pectoris. METHODS Seventeen patients were randomly assigned to the treatment (implantation within 2 weeks, eight patients) or control (implantation after 8 weeks, nine patients) group. Assessment of exercise capacity was performed by treadmill exercise testing. Quality of life was evaluated by daily and social activity scores and recording sublingual glyceryl trinitrate intake and angina pectoris attacks in a diary. After the 8-week study period, the control group also received the spinal cord stimulation device, and all patients were followed up for 12 months. RESULTS The treatment but not the control group demonstrated a significant increase in exercise duration (p < 0.02), rate-pressure product (p < 0.03) and time to angina (p < 0.04), with a decrease in ST segment depression (p < 0.05). This was associated with an increase in daily life (p < 0.008) and social activity (p < 0.005) scores and a reduction in glyceryl trinitrate intake (p < 0.004) and episodes of angina pectoris (p < 0.003). During the 1-year follow-up, improvement in all quality of life variables was linear for the entire group compared with baseline. The time to angina, exercise duration and ST segment depression showed a second-order trend. CONCLUSIONS Spinal cord stimulation significantly improves exercise capacity and quality of life. On the basis of an increase in exercise capacity and rate-pressure product, the mechanism by which spinal cord stimulation acts may be related to improved oxygen supply to the heart combined with an analgesic effect.

[1]  P. Wall,et al.  Pain mechanisms: a new theory. , 1965, Science.

[2]  L. Augustinsson,et al.  Assessment of the influence of spinal cord stimulation on left ventricular function in patients with severe angina pectoris: an echocardiographic study. , 1993, European heart journal.

[3]  L. Augustinsson Spinal Cord Electrical Stimulation in Severe Angina Pectoris: Surgical Technique, Intraoperative Physiology, Complications, and Side Effects , 1989, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[4]  A. Schneeweiss,et al.  Advances in Nitrate Therapy , 1988, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[5]  W H Sweet,et al.  Temporary Abolition of Pain in Man , 1967, Science.

[6]  S M Hilton,et al.  Dorsal root vasodilatation in cat skeletal muscle. , 1980, The Journal of physiology.

[7]  M Zelen,et al.  The randomization and stratification of patients to clinical trials. , 1974, Journal of chronic diseases.

[8]  P. Schwartz,et al.  A mechanism of cardiac pain suppression by spinal cord stimulation: implications for patients with angina pectoris. , 1993, European heart journal.

[9]  B. Meyerson,et al.  Peripheral vasodilatation after spinal cord stimulation: animal studies of putative effector mechanisms. , 1991, Neurosurgery.

[10]  C. Wilhelmsson,et al.  Influence of naloxone on the effects of high frequency transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in angina pectoris induced by atrial pacing. , 1989, British heart journal.

[11]  W. Haskell,et al.  Factors influencing estimated oxygen uptake during exercise testing soon after myocardial infarction. , 1982, The American journal of cardiology.

[12]  T C Chalmers,et al.  The importance of beta, the type II error and sample size in the design and interpretation of the randomized control trial. Survey of 71 "negative" trials. , 1978, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  P. Brooksby,et al.  Epidural spinal electrical stimulation for severe angina: a study of its effects on symptoms, exercise tolerance and degree of ischaemia. , 1992, European heart journal.

[14]  P. Cohn,et al.  Total ischemic burden: pathophysiology and prognosis. , 1987, The American journal of cardiology.

[15]  Keith E. Giles,et al.  Dorsal column stimulation for pain relief from intractable angina pectoris , 1987, Pain.

[16]  L. Augustinsson,et al.  Effects of spinal cord stimulation in angina pectoris induced by pacing and possible mechanisms of action. , 1993, BMJ.

[17]  C. Wilhelmsson,et al.  Epidural spinal electrical stimulation in severe angina pectoris. , 1988, British heart journal.

[18]  J. González-Darder,et al.  High cervical spinal cord stimulation for unstable angina pectoris. , 1991, Stereotactic and functional neurosurgery.

[19]  E F Cook,et al.  Comparative Reproducibility and Validity of Systems for Assessing Cardiovascular Functional Class: Advantages of a New Specific Activity Scale , 1981, Circulation.

[20]  Nursing elderly patients out of bed. , 1993, BMJ.