A step-up approach for selecting substitute suppliers under nonlinear profile data

ABSTRACT Selecting qualified suppliers from a group of candidates is important to procurement. Having several qualified suppliers to choose from can increase production flexibility and bargaining power. This research aims at selecting the substitute suppliers that can produce the parts with the same quality as the current supplier. Most of the existing supplier selection methods focused on univariate or linear profile data, which are insufficient to solve the supplier selection problem under nonlinear profile data. This research develops a step-up approach to select qualified suppliers for substitution under nonlinear profile data where there exists a nonlinear functional relationship between the quality characteristic and the explanatory variable. The proposed approach uses polynomial regression followed by the sequential test procedure to compare profile differences. The simulation results show that the proposed approach can reject the suppliers with different profile functions from the current supplier with satisfying power levels. To illustrate the effectiveness and practicality, the proposed approach is applied to select qualified voice coil motor (VCM) suppliers for a digital camera module manufacturer. Procuring the VCM from the selected suppliers can fulfill a higher demand, while maintaining the operational function and quality of the digital camera module.

[1]  Chen‐ju Lin,et al.  Comparing the lens displacement profile data by using the sequential approach for selecting alternative suppliers , 2020, Quality and Reliability Eng. Int..

[2]  Jeh-Nan Pan,et al.  Monitoring nonlinear profile data using support vector regression method , 2019, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int..

[3]  Wen Lea Pearn,et al.  An analytical closed-form solution for multiple line supplier selection problem , 2019 .

[4]  Fu-Kwun Wang,et al.  The Difference Test Statistic for Two Suppliers with Linear Profiles , 2016, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int..

[5]  Jeh-Nan Pan,et al.  Detecting the process changes for multivariate nonlinear profile data , 2019, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int..

[6]  Ying Zhang,et al.  Simulation-Based Simultaneous Confidence Bands in Multiple Linear Regression With Predictor Variables Constrained in Intervals , 2005 .

[7]  William H. Woodall,et al.  Statistical monitoring of nonlinear product and process quality profiles , 2007, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int..

[8]  Satoshi Kuriki,et al.  Simultaneous confidence bands for contrasts between several nonlinear regression curves , 2015, J. Multivar. Anal..

[9]  S. Khan,et al.  Supplier sustainability performance evaluation and selection: A framework and methodology , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[10]  Chien-Wei Wu,et al.  Efficient methods for comparing two process yields – strategies on supplier selection , 2013 .

[11]  W. Pearn,et al.  A note on Group Selection with multiple quality characteristics: power comparison of two methods , 2018, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[12]  Yeneneh Tamirat Negash,et al.  Multiple Comparisons With the Best and Difference Test Statistic for Supplier Selection for Nonlinear Profiles , 2019, IEEE Access.

[13]  P. Castagliola,et al.  Evaluation of process capability in non-linear profiles using Hausdorff distance , 2016 .

[14]  Fu-Kwun Wang,et al.  Process yield analysis for multivariate linear profiles , 2016 .

[15]  Ying Zhang,et al.  Multiple Comparison of Several Linear Regression Models , 2004 .

[16]  Fu-Kwun Wang,et al.  Implementing the Ratio Test Statistic to Compare Two Suppliers for Linear Profiles , 2016, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int..

[17]  Constant width simultaneous confidence bands in multiple linear regression with predictor variables constrained in intervals , 2005 .

[18]  Kuen-Suan Chen,et al.  Developing a quality-based supplier selection model from the buying company perspective , 2020 .

[19]  Fu-Kwun Wang,et al.  Multiple comparisons with the best for supplier selection with linear profiles , 2016 .

[20]  Wen Lea Pearn,et al.  Group selection for processes with multiple quality characteristics , 2018 .

[21]  Arash Shahin,et al.  A novel approach for supplier selection based on the Kano model and fuzzy MCDM , 2013 .

[22]  Fugee Tsung,et al.  A computationally efficient self-starting scheme to monitor general linear profiles with abrupt changes , 2019 .

[23]  Y. Hochberg A sharper Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance , 1988 .

[24]  Fred Sollish,et al.  Supplier Evaluation and Selection , 2012 .

[25]  Fu-Kwun Wang,et al.  Process Selection for Linear Profiles with One‐sided Specifications Based on the Ratio Test Statistic , 2015, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int..

[26]  Chia-Huang Wu,et al.  Supplier Selection for Multiple-Characteristics Processes with One-Sided Specifications , 2013 .

[27]  A. Tamhane,et al.  Multiple Comparison Procedures , 2009 .

[28]  E. H. Grosse,et al.  Decision support models for supplier development: systematic literature review and research agenda , 2017 .

[29]  Shu-Kai S. Fan,et al.  Nonlinear Profile Monitoring of Reflow Process Data Based on the Sum of Sine Functions , 2013, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int..

[30]  Chunguang Zhou,et al.  A Self-Starting Control Chart for Linear Profiles , 2007 .

[31]  Jaime A. Camelio,et al.  Statistical process control for multistage processes with non-repeating cyclic profiles , 2017 .

[32]  Douglas C. Montgomery,et al.  Some Current Directions in the Theory and Application of Statistical Process Monitoring , 2014 .

[33]  Chen-ju Lin,et al.  Multiple Comparisons with the Best for Supplier Selection , 2014, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int..

[34]  Yuhlong Lio,et al.  Nonlinear Profile Monitoring Using Spline Functions , 2020 .

[35]  Chen-ju Lin,et al.  Comparing multiple process overall yields from multiple manufacturing lines , 2017 .

[36]  Joseph Sarkis,et al.  Social sustainable supplier evaluation and selection: a group decision-support approach , 2019, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[37]  H. Keselman,et al.  Multiple Comparison Procedures , 2005 .

[38]  Maria Leonilde Rocha Varela,et al.  Supplier evaluation and selection: a fuzzy novel multi-criteria group decision-making approach , 2018 .

[39]  Amin Chaabane,et al.  Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods Application in Supply Chain Management: A Systematic Literature Review , 2018, Multi-Criteria Methods and Techniques Applied to Supply Chain Management.